Osteoclasts derive from hematopoietic stem cells according to marker, giant lysosomes of beige mice.

To ascertain the origin of multinucleated osteoclasts from hematopoietic stem cells, giant lysosomes peculiar to cells of beige mice (bg bg) were used as marker cells of that provenance. Radiation chimeras were established reciprocally between bg bg mice and osteopetrotic mi mi mice with defective osteoclasts. As a result, all the derivative cells of the hematopoietic stem cell would depend on the donor's cell line, whereas osteogenesis would remain the province of the host. It was affirmed in the chimeras mi mi/bg bg that the osteopetrosis was cured within six weeks. Thereafter the definitive osteoclasts of the chimeras contained giant lysosomes attributable to the beige cell line. However, the cure was well advanced before donor osteoclasts were prominent, for which several reasons are offered. In the mouse chimeras, bg bg/mi mi, there was a delay of some six weeks before osteopetrosis became evident, histologically before radiologically, at the major metaphyseal growth centers. During the period one to two months after establishment, osteoclasts appeared to be a mixture of two cell lines according to quantitative assessments for giant lysosomes. Assessments consisted of measurements of the percentage area of osteoclasts occupied by lysosomes over 1 micrometer diameter. The means were 0.018% +/- 0.008% for nonbeige stock and 2.09% +/- 0.58% for beige stock.

[1]  M. Holtrop,et al.  Time-related changes in the ultrastructure of osteoclasts after injection of parathyroid hormone in young rats , 1979, Calcified Tissue International.

[2]  J. Loutit,et al.  Giant lysosomes, a cytoplasmic marker in osteoclasts of beige mice , 1980, The Journal of pathology.

[3]  J. Loutit,et al.  Resolution and relapse of osteopetrosis in mice transplanted with myeloid tissue of variable histocompatibility. , 1979, Transplantation.

[4]  E. Weibel,et al.  Differential effect of glutaraldehyde and buffer osmolarity on cell dimensions: a study on lung tissue. , 1978, Journal of ultrastructure research.

[5]  J. Menage,et al.  Host-donor cellular interactions in the treatment of experimental osteopetrosis , 1978, Nature.

[6]  S. Marks,et al.  CHAPTER 6 – Mammalian Osteopetrosis—A Model for Studying Cellular and Humoral Factors in Bone Resorption , 1976 .

[7]  D. G. Walker Spleen cells transmit osteopetrosis in mice , 1975, Science.

[8]  D. G. Walker Bone resorption restored in osteopetrotic mice by transplants of normal bone marrow and spleen cells , 1975, Science.

[9]  C. Oliver,et al.  Formation of anomalous lysosomes in monocytes, neutrophils, and eosinophils from bone marrow of mice with Chédiak-Higashi syndrome. , 1975, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[10]  C. Skinner The Biochemistry and Physiology of Bone , 1956, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[11]  A. Friedenstein,et al.  OSTEOGENIC PRECURSOR CELLS OF BONE MARROW IN RADIATION CHIMERAS , 1971, Transplantation.

[12]  M. Owen,et al.  The origin of bone cells. , 1970, International review of cytology.

[13]  A. Spurr A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. , 1969, Journal of ultrastructure research.

[14]  T. Suda,et al.  [Biology of bone]. , 1966, Horumon to rinsho. Clinical endocrinology.

[15]  N. Hancox,et al.  THE OSTEOCLAST , 1949, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.