Using GIS to visualise and evaluate student travel behaviour

Using GIS to evaluate travel behaviour is an important technique to increase our understanding of the relationship between accessibility and transport demand. In this paper, the activity space concept was used to identify the nature of participation in activities (or lack of it) amongst a group of students using a 2 day travel-activity diary. Three different indicators such as the number of unique locations visited, average daily distance travelled, and average daily activity duration were used to measure the size of activity spaces. These indicators reflect levels of accessibility, personal mobility, and the extent of participation respectively. Multiple regression analyses were used to assess the impacts of students socio-economic status and the spatial characteristics of home location. Although no differences were found in the levels of accessibility and the extent of participation measures, home location with respect to a demand responsive transport (DRT) service was found to be the most important determinant of their mobility patterns. Despite being able to travel longer distances, students who live outside of the DRT service area were found to be temporally excluded from some opportunities. Student activity spaces were also visualised within a GIS environment and a spatial analysis was conducted to underpin the evaluation of the performance of the DRT. This approach was also used to identify the activity spaces of individuals that are geographically excluded from the service. Evaluation of these results indicated that although the service currently covers areas of high demand, 90% of the activity spaces remained un-served by the DRT service. Using this data six new routes were designed to meet the coverage goal of public transport based on a measure of network impedance based on inverse activity density. Following assessment of public transport service coverage, the study was extended using a Spatial Multi Criteria Evaluation (SMCE) technique to assess the effect of service provision on patronage.

[1]  B. Silverman.  Density estimation for statistics and data analysis , 1986 .

[2]  G. Higgs,et al.  Changes in service provision in rural areas. Part 1: The use of GIS in analysing accessibility to services in rural deprivation research , 1997 .

[3]  S. Cole.  Applied Transport Economics: Policy, Management and Decision Making , 1998 .

[4]  Irene Casas,et al.  Social Exclusion and the Disabled: An Accessibility Approach , 2007 .

[5]  J. Current,et al.  The median tour and maximal covering tour problems: Formulations and heuristics , 1994 .

[6]  J. Preston,et al.  Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion , 2007 .

[7]  P. G. Røe,et al.  Qualitative research on intra-urban travel: an alternative approach , 2000 .

[8]  Jacek Malczewski,et al.  GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis , 1999 .

[9]  Abolghasem Sadeghi-Niaraki,et al.  Ontology based personalized route planning system using a multi-criteria decision making approach , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Pavlos S. Kanaroglou,et al.  Urban Form and Household Activity‐Travel Behavior , 2006 .

[11]  Graham Currie,et al.  Investigating links between transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being in Melbourne: preliminary results , 2007 .

[12]  M. Dijst,et al.  Travel time ratio: the key factor of spatial reach , 2000 .

[13]  Geoffrey C. Smith,et al.  Effects of Extroversion on the Routine Spatial Behavior of Middle Adolescents , 1996 .

[14]  J. Urry,et al.  Social Exclusion, Mobility and Access 1 , 2005 .

[15]  J. Mageean,et al.  The evaluation of demand responsive transport services in Europe , 2003 .

[16]  Mark Gahegan,et al.  The case for inductive and visual techniques in the analysis of spatial data , 2000, J. Geogr. Syst..

[17]  M. Kwan,et al.  Scale and accessibility: Implications for the analysis of land use-travel interaction , 2008 .

[18]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Moving from trip-based to activity-based measures of accessibility , 2006 .

[19]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Activity spaces: Measures of social exclusion? , 2003 .

[20]  M. Schwab,et al.  DESCRIBING DISAGGREGATE FLOWS: INDIVIDUAL AND HOUSEHOLD ACTIVITY PATTERNS , 1986 .

[21]  Roger Mackett,et al.  AMELIA: A tool to make transport policies more socially inclusive , 2008 .

[22]  Peter White,et al.  Public Transport: Its Planning, Management and Operation , 1995 .

[23]  John Farrington,et al.  The New Narrative of Accessibility: Its potential contribution to discourses in (Transport) Geography , 2007 .

[24]  Stephen Nutley,et al.  Monitoring rural travel behaviour: a longitudinal study in Northern Ireland 1979–2001 , 2005 .

[25]  J. Wolpert.  BEHAVIORAL ASPECTS OF THE DECISION TO MIGRATE , 1965 .

[26]  T. McCray,et al.  Exploring the Role of Transportation in Fostering Social Exclusion: The Use of GIS to Support Qualitative Data , 2007 .

[27]  John McDonagh,et al.  Transport policy instruments and transport-related social exclusion in rural Republic of Ireland , 2006 .

[28]  Harvey J. Miller,et al.  Modelling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems , 1991, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[29]  Peter Hills,et al.  MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION OF TRANSPORT OPTIONS: FLEXIBLE, TRANSPARENT AND USER-FRIENDLY? , 2003 .

[30]  M. van Herwijnen,et al.  Spatial decision support systems , 2002 .

[31]  Konstantinos G. Zografos,et al.  A methodological approach for developing and assessing business models for flexible transport systems , 2008 .

[32]  Bert van Wee,et al.  Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions , 2004 .

[33]  Matthew J. Roorda,et al.  Exploring spatial variety in patterns of activity-travel behaviour: initial results from the Toronto Travel-Activity Panel Survey (TTAPS) , 2008 .

[34]  D. Shaw,et al.  The Distributional Effects Of Fuel Duties: The Impact On Rural Households In Scotland , 1999 .

[35]  F. E. Horton,et al.  Effects of Urban Spatial Structure on Individual Behavior , 1971 .

[36]  M. K. Zarkesh,et al.  Decision Support System for Floodwater Spreading Site Selection in Iran , 2002 .

[37]  Gerald Barber,et al.  AGGGREGATE CHARACTERISTICS OF URBAN TRAVEL. , 1995 .

[38]  L. Steg,et al.  How to define and measure access and need satisfaction in transport , 2008 .

[39]  S. S. Keshkamat,et al.  The formulation and evaluation of transport route planning alternatives: a spatial decision support system for the Via Baltica project, Poland , 2009 .

[40]  Antonella Zucca,et al.  Application of spatial multi-criteria analysis to site selection for a local park: a case study in the Bergamo Province, Italy. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[41]  David O'Sullivan,et al.  Geographic Information Analysis , 2002 .

[42]  M. Kwan.  Gender and Individual Access to Urban Opportunities: A Study Using Space–Time Measures , 1999 .

[43]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  A comprehensive daily activity-travel generation model system for workers , 2000 .

[44]  Richard D. Knowles,et al.  Transport Shaping Space: Differential Collapse in Time–Space , 2006 .

[45]  John Farrington,et al.  Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: towards conceptualisation , 2005 .

[46]  J. Hills,et al.  Understanding social exclusion , 2002 .

[47]  Julian Hine,et al.  Transport Disadvantage and Social Exclusion: Exclusionary Mechanisms in Transport in Urban Scotland , 2003 .

[48]  J. Current,et al.  The maximum covering/shortest path problem: A multiobjective network design and routing formulation , 1985 .

[49]  M. Moseley.  Accessibility: The rural challenge , 1979 .

[50]  Karen Lucas,et al.  Social exclusion: What can public transport offer? , 2008 .

[51]  K. Lucas.  Providing transport for social inclusion within a framework for environmental justice in the UK , 2006 .

[52]  J. Stanley,et al.  Investigating Links between Social Capital and Public Transport , 2008 .

[53]  J. Nelson,et al.  DEMAND RESPONSIVE TRANSPORT: TOWARDS THE EMERGENCE OF A NEW MARKET SEGMENT , 2004 .

[54]  E. I. Pas.  Weekly travel-activity behavior , 1988 .

[55]  Mark E.T. Horn,et al.  Procedures for planning multi-leg journeys with fixed-route and demand-responsive passenger transport services , 2004 .

[56]  Theodore H. Grossardt,et al.  Analytic Minimum Impedance Surface: Geographic Information System-Based Corridor Planning Methodology , 2001 .

[57]  P. Rollinson.  The Spatial Isolation of Elderly Single-Room-Occupancy Hotel Tenants* , 1991 .

[58]  M Dijst,et al.  INDIVIDUAL ACTION SPACE IN THE CITY. , 1997 .

[59]  Agneta Ståhl,et al.  TRANSPORT TELEMATICS FOR ELDERLY USERS: SUCCESSFUL USE OF AUTOMATED BOOKING AND CALL-BACK FOR DEMAND RESPONSIVE TRANSPORT SERVICES IN GOTHENBURG , 2000 .

[60]  Jarrett Walker.  Purpose-driven public transport: creating a clear conversation about public transport goals , 2007 .

[61]  Torsten Hägerstraand.  WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE IN REGIONAL SCIENCE , 1970 .

[62]  Paul D. Smith,et al.  Urban activity spaces: Illustrations and application of a conceptual model for integrating the time and space dimensions , 1998 .

[63]  S. Hanson,et al.  The Geography Of Urban Transportation , 1986 .

[64]  Mei-Po Kwan,et al.  Interactive geovisualization of activity-travel patterns using three-dimensional geographical information systems: a methodological exploration with a large data set , 2000 .

[65]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Strategic route extension in transit networks , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[66]  Harvey J. Miller,et al.  What about people in geographic information science? , 2003, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[67]  Margaret Grieco,et al.  Scatters and clusters in time and space: implications for delivering integrated and inclusive transport , 2003 .

[68]  J. Stanley.  Improving public transport to meet community needs: a Warrnambool case-study , 2004 .

[69]  Robert Cervero,et al.  FUTURE RIDE: ADAPTING NEW TECHNOLOGIES TO PARATRANSIT IN THE UNITED STATES. WORKING PAPER , 1996 .

[70]  Andrew Church,et al.  Transport and social exclusion in London , 1999 .

[71]  Jonathan Shaw,et al.  Community transport, social capital and social exclusion in rural areas , 2006 .

[72]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Activity‐based approaches to travel analysis: conceptual frameworks, models, and research problems , 1992 .

[73]  Julian Le Grand,et al.  Degrees of exclusion: developing a dynamic, multidimensional measure , 2002 .