Modeling effects of spatial patterns on the seed bank dynamics of Alopecurus myosuroides

A spatially explicit metapopulation neighborhood model was extended to encompass the seed bank dynamics of the annual weed Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. (blackgrass), growing in U.K. winter wheat crops established after noninversion tillage. The effects of the initial spatial pattern of infestation, herbicide, and combine harvesting on seed bank densities and on expected yield losses of the infested crop were studied within a 634 m2 area. In the absence of herbicide, all seed bank populations were large and typical of values in the literature; those with patchy initial distributions spread quickly over the entire field. The effects of intraspecific competition ensured that even after 10 yr, the average seed bank density from three patterns with the same initial density consistently retained the same rank order: the initially uniform pattern consistently ranked largest; a patchily distributed moderate infestation ranked next; a more patchily distributed heavy infestation ranked least. Expected grain yield losses sometimes exceeded 40%. With the introduction of a herbicide, seed densities declined exponentially, but the rank order with regard to spatial pattern remained. Relatively dense patches occasionally persisted for longer than 10 yr. The economic threshold for treatment was achieved within 2 and 5 yr, depending on the infestation pattern, but the model predicted that it would take many more than 10 yr before infestations could be completely eliminated. The effects of harvesting by combine were modeled. In all cases, the speed of the spread of infestation along a row appeared to be largely due to the combine rather than to natural dispersal or other cultivation practices. The proportion of seeds removed by the combine was an important determinant of the number of years required to drive the population below the economic threshold and of the probability of long-term eradication of the weed metapopulation.

[1]  José Luis González-Andújar,et al.  Models for the herbicidal control of the seed bank of Avena sterilis : the effects of spatial and temporal heterogeneity and of dispersal , 1995 .

[2]  Gurjeet Gill,et al.  Efficacy of cultural control methods for combating herbicide‐resistant Lolium rigidum , 1997 .

[3]  J. Perry,et al.  Estimating Taylor's power law parameters for weeds and the effect of spatial scale , 1996 .

[4]  P. Gould,et al.  On robust weed population models , 1989 .

[5]  E. Marshall,et al.  Field‐scale estimates of grass weed populations in arable land , 1988 .

[6]  J. González-Andújar High control measures cannot produce extinction in weed populations , 1996 .

[7]  S. Moss,et al.  The seed cycle of Alopecurus myosuroides in winter cereals: a quantitative analysis. , 1990 .

[8]  G. W. Cussans,et al.  The dispersal of weeds: seed movement in arable agriculture , 1991 .

[9]  José Luis González-Andújar,et al.  Dispersal in a metapopulation neighbourhood model of an annual plant with a seedbank , 1993 .

[10]  S. Moss Some effects of burning cereal straw on seed viability, seedling establishment and control of Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. , 1980 .

[11]  R. Cousens A simple model relating yield loss to weed density , 1985 .

[12]  J. M. van Groenendael,et al.  Patchy distribution of weeds and some implications for modelling population dynamics: a short literature review , 1988 .

[13]  C. Mallory-Smith,et al.  The nature and consequence of weed spread in cropping systems , 1997, Weed Science.

[14]  J. Hollies A survey of commercially grown high yielding wheat and barley crops from 1977 to 1981. , 1982 .

[15]  C. J. Doyle,et al.  A model of the economics of controlling Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. in winter wheat , 1986 .

[16]  C. J. Doyle,et al.  Mathematical models in weed management , 1991 .

[17]  Michael P. Hassell,et al.  DENSITY-DEPENDENCE IN SINGLE-SPECIES POPULATIONS , 1975 .

[18]  M. A. Martínez-Ghersa,et al.  Seed dispersal, distribution and recruitment of seedlings of Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. , 1993 .

[19]  P. Brain,et al.  Long‐term stability of distribution of Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. within cereal fields , 1991 .

[20]  John A. Silander,et al.  Field Tests of Neighborhood Population Dynamic Models of Two Annual Weed Species , 1990 .

[21]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  A Neighborhood Model of Annual‐Plant Interference , 1982 .

[22]  Roger D. Cousens,et al.  The effect of weed distribution on predictions of yield loss. , 1990 .

[23]  E. Marshall DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS OF PLANTS ASSOCIATED WITH ARABLE FIELD EDGES , 1989 .

[24]  P. Thornton,et al.  Spatial weed distribution and economic thresholds for weed control , 1990 .

[25]  S. Moss The survival of Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. seeds in soil , 1985 .

[26]  David A. Mortensen,et al.  Two Approaches to Weed Control Decision-Aid Software , 1991, Weed Technology.

[27]  Mark J. VanGessel,et al.  Influence of Weed Density and Distribution on Corn (Zea mays) Yield , 1995, Weed Science.

[28]  B. A. Auld,et al.  INVADE: Towards the simulation of plant spread , 1990 .

[29]  R. Naylor ASPECTS OF THE POPULATION DYNAMICS OF THE WEED ALOPECURUS MYOSUROIDES HUDS. IN WINTER CEREAL CROPS , 1972 .

[30]  C. Ballaré,et al.  The demography of Datura ferox (L.) in soybean crops , 1987 .

[31]  K. J. Wright,et al.  Predicting the growth and competitive effects of annual weeds in wheat , 1990 .

[32]  Gail G. Wilkerson,et al.  Modeling Weed Distribution for Improved Postemergence Control Decisions , 1992, Weed Science.

[33]  P. B. Cavers,et al.  Spread of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in Ontario, Canada. II. Dispersal by combines , 1988 .

[34]  Bruce D. Maxwell,et al.  The Influence of Weed Seed Dispersion Versus the Effect of Competition on Crop Yield , 1992, Weed Technology.

[35]  Gareth Hughes,et al.  Incorporating spatial pattern of harmful organisms into crop loss models , 1996 .