Efficient portfolio optimization with Conditional Value at Risk

The portfolio optimization problem is modeled as a mean-risk bicriteria optimization problem where the expected return is maximized and some (scalar) risk measure is minimized. In the original Markowitz model the risk is measured by the variance while several polyhedral risk measures have been introduced leading to Linear Programming (LP) computable portfolio optimization models in the case of discrete random variables represented by their realizations under specified scenarios. Among them, the second order quantile risk measures, recently, become popular in finance and banking. The simplest such measure, now commonly called the Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) or Tail VaR, represents the mean shortfall at a specified confidence level. Recently, the second order quantile risk measures have been introduced and become popular in finance and banking. The corresponding portfolio optimization models can be solved with general purpose LP solvers. However, in the case of more advanced simulation models employed for scenario generation one may get several thousands of scenarios. This may lead to the LP model with huge number of variables and constraints thus decreasing the computational efficiency of the model since the number of constraints (matrix rows) is usually proportional to the number of scenarios. while the number of variables (matrix columns) is proportional to the total of the number of scenarios and the number of instruments. We show that the computational efficiency can be then dramatically improved with an alternative model taking advantages of the LP duality. In the introduced models the number of structural constraints (matrix rows) is proportional to the number of instruments thus not affecting seriously the simplex method efficiency by the number of scenarios.

[1]  W. Ogryczak,et al.  LP solvable models for portfolio optimization: a classification and computational comparison , 2003 .

[2]  M. Rothschild 6 – Increasing Risk: I. A Definition* , 1978 .

[3]  Wlodzimierz Ogryczak,et al.  On Extending the LP Computable Risk Measures to Account Downside Risk , 2005, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[4]  Wlodzimierz Ogryczak,et al.  On solving the dual for portfolio selection by optimizing Conditional Value at Risk , 2011, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[5]  Byung Ha Lim,et al.  A Minimax Portfolio Selection Rule with Linear Programming Solution , 1998 .

[6]  S. Yitzhaki Stochastic Dominance, Mean Variance, and Gini's Mean Difference , 1982 .

[7]  Helmut Mausser,et al.  Credit risk optimization with Conditional Value-at-Risk criterion , 2001, Math. Program..

[8]  A. Röell Risk Aversion in Quiggin and Yaari's Rank-Order Model of Choice under Uncertainty , 1987 .

[9]  M. Yaari The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk , 1987 .

[10]  A. Müller,et al.  Comparison Methods for Stochastic Models and Risks , 2002 .

[11]  Alexandra Künzi-Bay,et al.  Computational aspects of minimizing conditional value-at-risk , 2006, Comput. Manag. Sci..

[12]  Wlodzimierz Ogryczak,et al.  Dual Stochastic Dominance and Related Mean-Risk Models , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[13]  Maria Grazia Speranza,et al.  On LP Solvable Models for Portfolio Selection , 2003, Informatica.

[14]  Csaba I. Fábián,et al.  An enhanced model for portfolio choice with SSD criteria: a constructive approach , 2011 .

[15]  R. Rockafellar,et al.  Optimization of conditional value-at risk , 2000 .

[16]  Naomi Miller,et al.  Risk-adjusted probability measures in portfolio optimization with coherent measures of risk , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  G. Pflug Some Remarks on the Value-at-Risk and the Conditional Value-at-Risk , 2000 .

[18]  Philippe Artzner,et al.  Coherent Measures of Risk , 1999 .

[19]  Maria Grazia Speranza,et al.  Conditional value at risk and related linear programming models for portfolio optimization , 2007, Ann. Oper. Res..

[20]  Georg Ch. Pflug,et al.  Scenario tree generation for multiperiod financial optimization by optimal discretization , 2001, Math. Program..

[21]  Hanif D. Sherali,et al.  Portfolio optimization by minimizing conditional value-at-risk via nondifferentiable optimization , 2010, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[22]  Wlodzimierz Ogryczak,et al.  From stochastic dominance to mean-risk models: Semideviations as risk measures , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  C. Klüppelberg,et al.  Modelling Extremal Events , 1997 .

[24]  Wlodzimierz Ogryczak,et al.  On efficient WOWA optimization for decision support under risk , 2009, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[25]  H. Konno,et al.  Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its applications to Tokyo stock market , 1991 .

[26]  A. Shorrocks Ranking Income Distributions , 1983 .

[27]  Wlodzimierz Ogryczak,et al.  Multiple criteria linear programming model for portfolio selection , 2000, Ann. Oper. Res..

[28]  A. Ruszczynski,et al.  Dual stochastic dominance and quantile risk measures , 2002 .

[29]  J. Desrosiers,et al.  A Primer in Column Generation , 2005 .

[30]  PAUL EMBRECHTS,et al.  Modelling of extremal events in insurance and finance , 1994, Math. Methods Oper. Res..

[31]  J. Quiggin A theory of anticipated utility , 1982 .