Eye movements during reading proverbs and regular sentences: the incoming word predictability effect

Reading is an everyday activity requiring the efficient integration of several central cognitive subsystems ranging from attention and oculomotor control to word identification and language comprehension. Effects of frequency, length and cloze predictability of words on reading times reliably indicate local processing difficulty of fixated words; also, a reader's expectation about an upcoming word apparently influences fixation duration even before the eyes reach this word. Moreover, this effect has been reported as non-canonical (i.e., longer fixation durations on word N when word N+1 is of high cloze predictability). However, this effect is difficult to observe because in natural sentences the fluctuations in predictability in content words are very small. To overcome this difficulty we investigated eye movements while reading proverbs as well as sentences constructed for high- and low-average cloze predictability. We also determined for each sentence a word at which predictability of words jumps from a low to high value. Fixation durations while reading proverbs and high-predictable sentences exhibited significant effects of the change in predictability along the sentence (when the successive word is more predictable than the fixated word). Results are in agreement with the proposal that cloze predictability of upcoming words exerts an influence on fixation durations via memory retrieval.

[1]  Victor Kuperman,et al.  The effect of word position on eye-movements in sentence and paragraph reading , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Wilson L. Taylor,et al.  “Cloze Procedure”: A New Tool for Measuring Readability , 1953 .

[3]  K. Rayner,et al.  Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading , 1981 .

[4]  Freda Kemp Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 2003 .

[5]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading: Models and data , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .

[7]  A. Kennedy,et al.  Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading , 2005, Vision Research.

[8]  Boris New,et al.  A multiple regression analysis of syntactic and semantic influences in reading normal text , 2008 .

[9]  D. Balota,et al.  Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  K. Rayner The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  John Hale,et al.  Parallel processing and sentence comprehension difficulty , 2011 .

[12]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Conditional co-occurrence probability acts like frequency in predicting fixation durations , 2008 .

[13]  Wei Zhou,et al.  Lexical and sublexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  S. Liversedge,et al.  Oxford handbook of eye movements , 2011 .

[15]  M. Kutas,et al.  Interactions between sentence context and word frequencyinevent-related brainpotentials , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  A test of parafoveal‐on‐foveal effects with pairs of orthographically related words , 2004 .

[17]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  K. Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Foveal and parafoveal processing during reading. , 2011 .

[20]  Frank Keller,et al.  Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity , 2008, Cognition.

[21]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[22]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006). , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effects of contextual predictability and transitional probability on eye movements during reading. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  R. Groner Eye Movements and Psychological Functions: International Views , 1983 .

[28]  Denis Drieghe,et al.  Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements during reading , 2011 .

[29]  K. Rayner,et al.  Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[30]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning , 1997, Nature.

[31]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Toward a Perceptual-Span Theory of Distributed Processing in Reading: A Reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Drieghe, Slattery, and Reichle (2007). , 2007 .

[32]  Wayne S. Murray,et al.  Frequency and predictability effects in the Dundee Corpus: An eye movement analysis , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Parsing costs as predictors of reading difficulty: An evaluation using the Potsdam Sentence Corpus , 2008, Journal of Eye Movement Research.

[34]  Drew H. Abney,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Influence of Musical Groove on Postural Sway , 2015 .

[35]  Todd R. Ferretti,et al.  Moment-By-Moment Reading of Proverbs in Literal and Nonliteral Contexts , 2001 .

[36]  A. Katz,et al.  Moment-By-Moment Reading of Proverbs in Literal and Nonliteral Contexts , 2001 .

[37]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading , 2006, Brain Research.

[39]  Frank Keller,et al.  Using the Web to Obtain Frequencies for Unseen Bigrams , 2003, CL.

[40]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Eye Movements Reveal the On-Line Computation of Lexical Probabilities During Reading , 2003, Psychological science.

[41]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.

[42]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[43]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Eye Movement Control during Reading: Effects of Word Frequency and Orthographic Familiarity Word Frequency Effects , 2022 .

[44]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading , 2004 .

[45]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.