Experimental Studies of a Pulse Pressurisation Technique for Measuring Building Airtightness

A pulse pressurisation technique is developed and utilised for determining building leakage at low pressure, based on a “quasi-steady pulse” concept. The underlying principle of the technique is to subject the building envelope to a known volume change in a short period of time (typically 1.5 s). The resulting pressure pulse is recorded, from which the leakage characteristic at low pressure is determined. The technique minimizes the effects of wind and buoyancy forces and has proven to be repeatable. It can use a compact and portable test rig and does not need to penetrate the building envelope. Therefore, it can obtain the leakage of a building very quickly and efficiently. Throughout the various stages of research and development of the pulse technique, experimental investigations have been carried out under different configurations and scenarios in order to validate the changes that have been made for the purpose of system development and optimisation. This paper provides an overview of experimental investigations in the validation process by covering comparison between blower door and pulse unit, comparison between piston-based pulse unit and nozzle-based pulse unit, testing with multiple pulse units in a large building, testing with a known opening, and testing in different building types with a range of volumes and airtightness levels. It enables us to understand the strengths and the limits of the pulse technique, from the experimental and practical perspectives. A good repeatability level (within ±5%) has been maintained throughout the various developmental stages and the average value of Q50/Q4 reported herein was in close agreement (

[1]  Targo Kalamees,et al.  Building leakage, infiltration, and energy performance analyses for Finnish detached houses , 2009 .

[2]  R. W. Graham,et al.  Air leakage measurement of buildings by an infrasonic method. Final report, May 1976--December 1977 , 1978 .

[3]  Edward Cooper,et al.  Determining the adventitious leakage of buildings at low pressure. Part 2: pulse technique , 2007 .

[4]  Min Jung Lee,et al.  Improvement in the applicability of the air tightness measurement using a sudden expansion of compressed air , 2013 .

[5]  D. W. Etheridge,et al.  Determining the adventitious leakage of buildings at low pressure. Part 1: uncertainties , 2007 .

[6]  Geoffrey Van Moeseke,et al.  Factors influencing airtightness and airtightness predictive models: A literature review , 2017 .

[7]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review on buildings energy consumption information , 2008 .

[8]  Max H. Sherman,et al.  Building airtightness: Research and practice , 2004 .

[9]  Johan Claesson,et al.  A Transient Pressurization Method for Measurements of Airtightness , 2007 .

[10]  Fredrik Gränne.  Air and Water Tightness in Building Envelopes - Evaluation of Methods for Quality Assurance , 2001 .

[11]  Derek Sinnott,et al.  Air-tightness field data for dwellings in Ireland , 2012 .

[12]  Andrew K. Persily,et al.  Energy Impacts of Infiltration and Ventilation in U.S. Office Buildings Using Multizone Airflow Simulation | NIST , 1999 .

[13]  A. Anderson.  The history of the blower door , 1995 .

[14]  Hiroyasu Okuyama,et al.  Reconsideration of parameter estimation and reliability evaluation methods for building airtightness measurement using fan pressurization , 2012 .

[15]  N. Arai,et al.  Unsteady pressurization method to measure the airtightness of the building envelope , 2020, Research in Building Physics.

[16]  Saffa Riffat,et al.  A NOZZLE PULSE PRESSURISATION TECHNIQUE FOR MEASUREMENT OF BUILDING LEAKAGE AT LOW PRESSURE , 2015 .

[17]  Ralph T. Muehleisen,et al.  Detection and quantification of building air infiltration using remote acoustic methods , 2014 .

[18]  Osama A.B. Hassan,et al.  An alternative method for evaluating the air tightness of building components , 2013 .

[19]  Tiberiu Catalina,et al.  Acoustic approach for building air permeability estimation , 2012 .

[20]  K. Kobbacy,et al.  Building and Environment , 2016 .

[21]  Hiroshi KOBAYASHI,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF VALIDATION OF AC-PRESSURIZATION MEASURING OF LEAKAGE AREA OF HOUSES , 1999 .

[22]  Mia Ala-Juusela,et al.  Buildings and Climate Change: Summary for Decision-Makers , 2009 .

[23]  Monika Woloszyn,et al.  Multizone air leakage measurements and interactions with ventilation flows in low-energy homes , 2016 .

[24]  Max H. Sherman,et al.  Signal attenuation due to cavity leakage , 1988 .

[25]  Takashi Sonoda,et al.  A sonic method for building air-leakage measurements☆ , 1986 .

[26]  D. W. Etheridge,et al.  Leakage measurements using unsteady techniques with particular reference to large buildings , 2001 .

[28]  Tim Sharpe,et al.  Building tight – ventilating right? How are new air tightness standards affecting indoor air quality in dwellings? , 2014 .

[29]  Steve Sharples,et al.  Airtightness testing of very large buildings: a case study , 2005 .

[30]  Min Jung Lee,et al.  Air tightness measurement with transient methods using sudden expansion from a compressed chamber , 2011 .

[32]  M. Orme.  Estimates of the energy impact of ventilation and associated financial expenditures , 2001 .

[33]  C. Wood,et al.  A comparison study of the blower door and novel pulse technique on measuring enclosure airtightness in a controlled environment , 2017 .

[34]  Viorel Badescu,et al.  Consideration of a new extended power law of air infiltration through the building’s envelope providing estimations of the leakage area , 2017 .

[35]  François Rémi Carrié,et al.  Uncertainties in building pressurisation tests due to steady wind , 2016 .