ADVERSE EVENTS OF THE ARGUS II RETINAL PROSTHESIS: Incidence, Causes, and Best Practices for Managing and Preventing Conjunctival Erosion.

PURPOSE To analyze and provide an overview of the incidence, management, and prevention of conjunctival erosion in Argus II clinical trial subjects and postapproval patients. METHODS This retrospective analysis followed the results of 274 patients treated with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System between June 2007 and November 2017, including 30 subjects from the US and European clinical trials, and 244 patients in the postapproval phase. Results were gathered for incidence of a serious adverse event, incidence of conjunctival erosion, occurrence sites, rates of erosion, and erosion timing. RESULTS Overall, 60% of subjects in the clinical trial subjects versus 83% of patients in the postapproval phase did not experience device- or surgery-related serious adverse events. In the postapproval phase, conjunctival erosion had an incidence rate of 6.2% over 5 years and 11 months. In 55% of conjunctival erosion cases, erosion occurred in the inferotemporal quadrant, 25% in the superotemporal quadrant, and 20% in both. Sixty percent of the erosion events occurred in the first 15 months after implantation, and 85% within the first 2.5 years. CONCLUSION Reducing occurrence of conjunctival erosion in patients with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis requires identification and minimization of risk factors before and during implantation. Implementing inverted sutures at the implant tabs, use of graft material at these locations as well as Mersilene rather than nylon sutures, and accurate Tenon's and conjunctiva closure are recommended for consideration in all patients.

[1]  José-Alain Sahel,et al.  Adapted Surgical Procedure for Argus II Retinal Implantation: Feasibility, Safety, Efficiency, and Postoperative Anatomic Findings. , 2017, Ophthalmology. Retina.

[2]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Performance of real‐world functional vision tasks by blind subjects improves after implantation with the Argus® II retinal prosthesis system , 2016, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[3]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Improvements in vision‐related quality of life in blind patients implanted with the Argus II Epiretinal Prosthesis , 2016, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[4]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Five-Year Safety and Performance Results from the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System Clinical Trial. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[5]  J. Sahel,et al.  Argus II retinal prosthesis implantation with scleral flap and autogenous temporalis fascia as alternative patch graft material: a 4-year follow-up , 2016, Clinical ophthalmology.

[6]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  An analysis of observer‐rated functional vision in patients implanted with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System at three years , 2016, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[7]  D. Geruschat,et al.  Restoration of Vision following Long-Term Blindness: Considerations for Providing Rehabilitation , 2016 .

[8]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Long-Term Results from an Epiretinal Prosthesis to Restore Sight to the Blind. , 2015, Ophthalmology.

[9]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  FLORA™: Phase I development of a functional vision assessment for prosthetic vision users , 2015, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[10]  J. Bennett,et al.  The Status of RPE65 Gene Therapy Trials: Safety and Efficacy. , 2015, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine.

[11]  E. Stone,et al.  Stem cells for investigation and treatment of inherited retinal disease , 2014, Human molecular genetics.

[12]  Y. Buys,et al.  Conjunctival Complications Related to Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Insertion , 2014, Journal of glaucoma.

[13]  P. Greenberg,et al.  Retinal implants: a systematic review , 2014, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[14]  A. Chuang,et al.  Aqueous Shunt Exposure: A Retrospective Review of Repair Outcome , 2013, Journal of glaucoma.

[15]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  The Argus II epiretinal prosthesis system allows letter and word reading and long-term function in patients with profound vision loss , 2013, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[16]  G. Trope,et al.  Repair of Eroded Glaucoma Drainage Devices: Mid-term Outcomes , 2012, Journal of glaucoma.

[17]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Interim results from the international trial of Second Sight's visual prosthesis. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[18]  N. Schalij-Delfos,et al.  Complications due to bovine pericardium used to cover acrylic implants after enucleation and tubes of aqueous devices , 2012, Eye.

[19]  A. Choudhary,et al.  Ahmed glaucoma valves in refractory glaucoma: a 7-year audit , 2009, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[20]  G. Trope,et al.  Glaucoma Aqueous Drainage Device Erosion Repair With Buccal Mucous Membrane Grafts , 2009, Journal of glaucoma.

[21]  M. Yaseri,et al.  Superior versus inferior Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[22]  Y. Buys,et al.  Intermediate-term Outcome and Success of Superior Versus Inferior Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation , 2008, Journal of glaucoma.

[23]  R. MacLaren,et al.  Stem cell therapy and the retina , 2007, Eye.

[24]  Dyonne T Hartong,et al.  Retinitis pigmentosa , 2009 .

[25]  P. Walter,et al.  Epiretinale Sehprothesen , 2005, Der Ophthalmologe.

[26]  M. Boniuk,et al.  Bovine Pericardium Versus Homologous Sclera as a Wrapping for Hydroxyapatite Orbital Implants , 2003, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[27]  D. Holck,et al.  Bovine pericardium versus homologous sclera as wrapping materials for hydroxyapatite ocular implants: an animal study. , 1999, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[28]  A. Coleman,et al.  Intermediate-term clinical experience with the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implant. , 1999, American journal of ophthalmology.

[29]  J. Mortimer,et al.  Visual sensations produced by optic nerve stimulation using an implanted self-sizing spiral cuff electrode , 1998, Brain Research.

[30]  D. Richards,et al.  A clinical study of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in advanced glaucoma. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[31]  A. Milam,et al.  Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa. A morphometric analysis. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[32]  M. Mladejovsky,et al.  Artificial Vision for the Blind: Electrical Stimulation of Visual Cortex Offers Hope for a Functional Prosthesis , 1974, Science.