DECISION MAKING AND LEARNING UNDER VARYING CONDITIONS OF REINFORCEMENT *

From the work of philosophers, mathematicians, economists, and psychologists, a theory of rational choice has emerged that considers the nature of rational behavior in human decision-making.’-’O According to this approach, when a person can specify a set of alternative outcomes such that for any strategy p , he knows the probability distribution of outcomes, that person is LLrational” if he chooses a strategy that will enable maximization of expected utility. Most decision-making theorists take “probability” to mean subjective probability, and “utility” to mean subjective value. Thus a strategy p , is admissible if there is no other strategy p , such that

[1]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  L. Humphreys Acquisition and extinction of verbal expectations in a situation analogous to conditioning. , 1939 .

[3]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[4]  M. Jarvik,et al.  Probability learning and a negative recency effect in the serial anticipation of alternative symbols. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  D. A. Grant,et al.  Acquisition and extinction of a verbal conditioned response with differing percentages of reinforcement. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  W. Estes,et al.  A theory of stimulus variability in learning. , 1953, Psychological review.

[7]  H. Hake,et al.  Perception of the statistical structure of a random series of binary symbols. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  W. Estes,et al.  Analysis of a verbal conditioning situation in terms of statistical learning theory , 1954 .

[9]  J. Goodnow Determinants of choice-distribution in two-choice situations. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[10]  Masanao Toda,et al.  GUESSING SEQUENCE UNDER VARIOUS CONDITIONS OF PAYOFF , 1956 .

[11]  S. Messick,et al.  Probability learning in children: some exploratory studies. , 1957, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[12]  S. Siegel,et al.  Level of aspiration and decision making. , 1957, Psychological review.

[13]  Sidney Siegel,et al.  Theoretical models of choice and strategy behavior: Stable state behavior in the two-choice uncertain outcome situation , 1959 .

[14]  S. Siegel,et al.  Decision making behavior in a two-choice uncertain outcome situation. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  Albert Bonelli,et al.  Bargaining and Group Decision Making, Experiments in Bilateral Monopoly , 1960 .