Attended and Non-Attended States in Working Memory: Accessing Categorized Structures

Abstract Following several recent approaches, working memory is argued to consist of a subset of representations that are within the scope of active processing and a larger set of recently activated, but non-attended representations. A response-signal speed-accuracy tradeoff (SAT) and complementary reaction time variant of a probe recognition task were used to measure the retrieval of categorized material from working memory. In SAT, two distinct retrieval speeds were found: A fast rate for items from the last studied category and a slower rate common to all items from other categories in the list. This difference in retrieval speed was evident in the shapes of the reaction time distributions. The faster retrieval speed for items from the last category is argued to reflect a matching process in which the recognition probe is rapidly compared to the current contents of awareness.

[1]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Cuing effects in short-term recall , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[2]  R. Engle.  Working Memory and Retrieval: An Inhibition-Resource Approach , 1996 .

[3]  Brian McElree,et al.  Accessing short-term memory with semantic and phonological information: A time-course analysis , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[4]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Transient phonemic codes and immunity to proactive interference , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[5]  N. Cowan.  Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework , 1995 .

[6]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory and retrieval: a resource-dependent inhibition model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  Tim Curran,et al.  Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. , 1994 .

[8]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial Retrieval Processes in the Recovery of Order Information , 1993 .

[9]  R. Engle,et al.  Working-memory capacity as long-term memory activation: an individual-differences approach. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  B. McElree,et al.  The locus of lexical preference effects in sentence comprehension , 1993 .

[11]  B B Murdock,et al.  TODAM2: a model for the storage and retrieval of item, associative, and serial-order information. , 1993, Psychological review.

[12]  N. Cowan.  Activation, attention, and short-term memory , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[13]  S. Clark,et al.  Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[15]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition , 1989 .

[16]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Retrieval Dynamics of Priming in Recognition Memory: Bias and Discrimination Analysis , 1989 .

[17]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Time course of item and associative information: implications for global memory models. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  B. Dosher,et al.  Integrated retrieval cues as a mechanism for priming in retrieval from memory , 1989 .

[19]  Mark C. Detweiler,et al.  The Role of Practice in Dual-Task Performance: Toward Workload Modeling a Connectionist/Control Architecture , 1988, Human factors.

[20]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[21]  J. Bain,et al.  Set-size effects in primary memory: An age-related capacity limitation? , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[22]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Continuous versus discrete information processing modeling accumulation of partial information. , 1988, Psychological review.

[23]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Degree of learning and retrieval speed: Study time and multiple exposures. , 1984 .

[24]  W. Hockley.  Analysis of response time distributions in the study of cognitive processes. , 1984 .

[25]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory , 1984 .

[26]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Exploring the Articulatory Loop , 1984 .

[27]  Bennet B. Murdock,et al.  A distributed memory model for serial-order information. , 1983 .

[28]  B. Murdock.  A Theory for the Storage and Retrieval of Item and Associative Information. , 1982 .

[29]  B. Dosher.  Effect of Sentence Size and Network Distance on Retrieval Speed. , 1982 .

[30]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  The effects of delay and interference: A speed-accuracy study , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  Delos D. Wickens,et al.  The nature and timing of the retrieval process and of interference effects. , 1981 .

[32]  Michael J. Hacker.  Speed and accuracy of recency judgments for events in short-term memory. , 1980 .

[33]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Priming and Retrieval from Short-Term Memory: A Speed Accuracy Trade-Off Analysis , 1980 .

[34]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A note on modeling accumulation of information when the rate of accumulation changes over time , 1980 .

[35]  R. Ratcliff.  Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  Paul Muter,et al.  Response latencies in discriminations of recency , 1979 .

[37]  S. Monsell.  Recency, immediate recognition memory, and reaction time , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[38]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[39]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[40]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  The retrieval of sentences from memory: A speed-accuracy study , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Retrieval Processes in Recognition Memory , 1976 .

[42]  S. Sternberg.  Memory Scanning: New Findings and Current Controversies , 1975 .

[43]  A V Reed,et al.  Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Recognition Memory , 1973, Science.

[44]  B. Murdock,et al.  Strength theory and recognition memory , 1972 .

[45]  B. Murdock.  A parallel-processing model for scanning , 1971 .

[46]  W. Montague,et al.  Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms , 1969 .

[47]  D. Norman,et al.  Strength models and serial position in short-term recognition memory ☆ , 1966 .

[48]  B. McElree,et al.  Syntactic and Thematic Processing in Sentence Comprehension: Evidence for a Temporal Dissociation , 1995 .

[49]  G. G. Vining.  Data Analysis: A Model-Comparison Approach , 1989 .

[50]  David E. Irwin,et al.  The dynamics of cognition and action: mental processes inferred from speed-accuracy decomposition. , 1988, Psychological review.

[51]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[52]  M. Vidulich,et al.  Retrieval time as a function of memory set size, type of probes, and interference in recognition memory. , 1985 .

[53]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[54]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[55]  William E. Hockley,et al.  Tests of serial scanning in item recognition. , 1982 .

[56]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Empirical approaches to information processing: Speed-accuracy tradeoff functions or reaction time — a reply , 1979 .

[57]  John G. Seamon,et al.  Generative processes in character classification: Evidence for a probe encoding set , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[58]  A. V. Reed,et al.  List length and the time course of recognition in immediate memory , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[59]  John Theios,et al.  Reaction Time Measurements in the Study of Memory Processes: Theory and Data1 , 1973 .

[60]  M. Posner,et al.  Retention of visual and name codes of single letters. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[61]  M King,et al.  Behavioral Science. , 1958, Science.

[62]  G. A. Miller.  The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. , 1956, Psychological review.

[63]  M. Manosevitz,et al.  High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory , 2022 .