Approaches to Integrating Engineering in STEM Units and Student Achievement Gains

This study examined different approaches to integrating engineering practices in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) curriculum units. These various approaches were correlated with student outcomes on engineering assessment items. There are numerous reform documents in the USA and around the world that emphasize the need to incorporate engineering into science education. The authors of this study contend that different approaches to integrating engineering in STEM units correlate to larger student achievement gains in engineering, based on assessment items developed from the Framework for Quality K–12 Engineering Education (Moore, Glancy, Tank, Kersten, & Smith, 2014). The goal of this work is not to establish one singular working definition for how to integrate the disciplines of STEM but rather to focus on characteristics of integrating engineering within STEM curricular units that are associated with higher student achievement gains in engineering for the students involved in this study. The results indicate that when engineering is introduced at the beginning of the unit to provide context for the learning, and revisited throughout the duration of the unit, student achievement gains with engineering assessment items are greater than when engineering is incorporated only at the end of the unit as a design challenge in the form of a culminating project.

[1]  Alija Kulenović,et al.  Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing , 1999 .

[2]  Aran W. Glancy,et al.  A Framework for Quality K-12 Engineering Education: Research and Development , 2014 .

[3]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[4]  D. Eignor The standards for educational and psychological testing. , 2013 .

[5]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[6]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  From Physical Models to Biomechanics: A Design-Based Modeling Approach. , 1998 .

[7]  Christine Schnittka,et al.  Engineering Education in the Science Classroom: A Case Study of One Teacher's Disparate Approach with Ability-Tracked Classrooms. , 2012 .

[8]  Ngss Lead States Next generation science standards : for states, by states , 2013 .

[9]  N. Vaidya,et al.  Science Teaching for the 21st Century , 2002 .

[10]  Kristen B. Wendell,et al.  Engineering Design‐Based Science, Science Content Performance, and Science Attitudes in Elementary School , 2013 .

[11]  David A. Gillam,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2012 .

[12]  L. Katehi,et al.  Engineering in K-12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects. , 2009 .

[13]  Rodger W. Bybee,et al.  Advancing STEM Education: A 2020 Vision , 2010 .

[14]  Matthew M. Mehalik,et al.  Middle‐School Science Through Design‐Based Learning versus Scripted Inquiry: Better Overall Science Concept Learning and Equity Gap Reduction , 2008 .

[15]  Robin J. Fogarty Ten ways to integrate curriculum , 1991 .

[16]  Christine M. Cunningham,et al.  ENGINEERING IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS , 2014 .

[17]  Melissa Dark,et al.  Exploring the Effectiveness of an Interdisciplinary Water Resources Engineering Module in an Eighth Grade Science Course , 2009 .

[18]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Problem-based Learning Meets Case-based Reasoning , 1996, ICLS.

[19]  Monica E. Cardella,et al.  Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices , 2014 .

[20]  David A. Tumbarello,et al.  The Case for Stem Education: Challenges and Opportunities , 2013 .

[21]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research , 2014 .

[22]  S. Selcen Guzey,et al.  Student Participation in Engineering Practices and Discourse: An Exploratory Case Study , 2017 .

[23]  L.J. Leifer,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[24]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Problem-Based Learning Meets Case-Based Reasoning in the Middle-School Science Classroom: Putting Learning by Design(tm) Into Practice , 2003 .