Perceptions of contribution in multi-cultural groups in non-GDSS and GDSS environments

Abstract This study examined multi-cultural team decision making within a Group Decision Support System (GDSS) environment and within a non-GDSS face-to-face (FtF) environment. One hundred and eleven undergraduate students of varying ethnicities participated in the study. The perceptions of contribution of ethnic minority group members were compared to non-minorities. Results showed that in terms of overall perceptions of contributions involving rating of self, rating of others, and rating by others, the non-GDSS environment achieved higher ratings over the GDSS environment. Although, ethnic minorities' rating of self was significantly lower than the ethnic minorities' rating of others in the non-GDSS environment. In comparison, there were no significant differences between these ratings in the GDSS environment. Furthermore, consistent with previous research on GDSS the average number of ideas generated in the GDSS environment was significantly higher than in the non-GDSS environment.

[1]  Paul S. Kirkbride,et al.  Developing Conflict Management Skills in Hong Kong: An Analysis of some Cross-Cultural Implications , 1986 .

[2]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[3]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Distinguishing Between the Forest and the Trees: Media, Features, and Methodology in Electronic Communication Research , 1994 .

[4]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Defining Common Ground: Managing Diversity Through Electronic Meeting Systems , 1993, ICIS.

[5]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[6]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  A Korean group decision support system , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[7]  Richard T. Herschel,et al.  The Impact of Varying Gender Composition on Group Brainstorming Performance in a GSS Environment , 1994 .

[8]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[9]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Incentives and Computing Systems for Team-Based Organizations , 1995 .

[10]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Getting a Clue , 1996 .

[12]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  Interacting effects of GDSS and leadership , 1994, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  T. Cox,et al.  Managing cultural diversity: implications for organizational competitiveness , 1991 .

[14]  Catherine Kirchmeyer.  Multicultural Task Groups , 1993 .

[15]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  A group decision support system for multicultural and multilingual communication , 1994, Decis. Support Syst..

[16]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Experience at IBM with group support systems: A field study , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[17]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[18]  Leonard M. Jessup,et al.  The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task , 1990, MIS Q..

[19]  N. Adler.  International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior , 1986 .

[20]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Computer Support for Meetings of Groups Working on Unstructured Problems: A Field Experiment , 1988, MIS Q..

[21]  Catherine Kirchmeyer,et al.  Multicultural Groups , 1992 .

[22]  Kenneth L. Bettenhausen.  Five Years of Groups Research: What We Have Learned and What Needs to Be Addressed , 1991 .

[23]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Geoff Lockett,et al.  Modelling a Research Portfolio Using AHP: A Group Decision Process , 1986 .

[25]  S. Weisband.  Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups , 1992 .

[26]  Warren E. Watson,et al.  Cultural diversity''s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diver , 1993 .

[27]  P. McLeod,et al.  Effects of Ethnic Group Cultural Differences on Cooperative and Competitive Behavior On a Group Task , 1991 .

[28]  Willie E. Hopkins,et al.  Organizational Productivity 2000: A Work Force Perspective , 1991 .

[29]  Sherry K. Schneider,et al.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION AND SOCIAL INFORMATION: STATUS SALIENCE AND STATUS DIFFERENCES , 1995 .

[30]  Richard E. Yellen,et al.  Extraversion and introversion in electronically-supported meetings , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[31]  Molefi Kete Asante,et al.  Black and White Communication , 1985 .

[32]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Computer-Based Support for Group Problem-Finding: An Experimental Investigation , 1988, MIS Q..

[33]  R. Watson,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication and Majority Influence , 1998 .

[34]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Study of Collaborative Group Work With and Without Computer-Based Support , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  Martin Read,et al.  On-line group process support , 1993 .

[36]  G. Hofstede.  The Cultural Relativity of the Quality of Life Concept , 1984 .

[37]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Study of Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1988, MIS Q..

[38]  Steven R. Ash,et al.  The effects of a group decision support system on culturally diverse and culturally homogeneous group decision making , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[39]  Joyce Fortune.  Idea Generation Techniques for Quality Improvement , 1992 .

[40]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences , 1988, MIS Q..

[41]  B. Daily,et al.  The influence of group decision support systems on contribution and commitment levels in multicultural and culturally homogeneous decision-making groups , 1998 .

[42]  Taylor Cox,et al.  The multicultural organization , 1991 .