Neural responses to Mooney images reveal a modular representation of faces in human visual cortex

The way in which information about objects is represented in visual cortex remains controversial. One model of human object recognition poses that information is processed in modules, highly specialised for different categories of objects; an opposing model appeals to a distributed representation across a large network of visual areas. We addressed this debate by monitoring activity in face- and object-selective areas while human subjects viewed ambiguous face stimuli (Mooney faces). The measured neural response in the face-selective region of the fusiform gyrus was greater when subjects reported seeing a face than when they perceived the image as a collection of blobs. In contrast, there was no difference in magnetic resonance response between face and no-face perceived events in either the face-selective voxels of the superior temporal sulcus or the object-selective voxels of the parahippocampal gyrus and lateral occipital complex. These results challenge the concept that neural representation of faces is distributed and overlapping and suggest that the fusiform gyrus is tightly linked to the awareness of faces.

[1]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection , 1999, Nature.

[2]  C. Koch,et al.  Category-specific visual responses of single neurons in the human medial temporal lobe , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Neurones responsive to faces in the temporal cortex: studies of functional organization, sensitivity to identity and relation to perception. , 1984, Human neurobiology.

[4]  S. Edelman,et al.  Computational Theories of Object Recognition Edelman -computation and Object Recognition Ii Box 1. Structural Descriptions ~ 7~ Recognition by Components Varieties of Alignment Multidimensional Histograms Approximation in Feature Space , 2022 .

[5]  O. Witte,et al.  Functional Mapping of the Human Brain , 2000 .

[6]  D. Jeffreys.  A face-responsive potential recorded from the human scalp , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Ronald C. Desrosiers.  Inching towards a vaccine for AIDS , 1992, Current Biology.

[8]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Robust automated brain extraction , 2000, NeuroImage.

[11]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The functional organization of human extrastriate cortex: a PET-rCBF study of selective attention to faces and locations , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  The effects of visual object priming on brain activation before and after recognition , 2000, Current Biology.

[13]  Timothy J Andrews,et al.  Binocular rivalry and visual awareness , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  S. Ullman.  High-Level Vision: Object Recognition and Visual Cognition , 1996 .

[15]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Leslie G. Ungerleider.  Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[17]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading. , 1997, Science.

[18]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures , 1998, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[19]  E K Warrington,et al.  Prosopagnosia: A Face-Specific Disorder , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[20]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  How Distributed Is Visual Category Information in Human Occipito-Temporal Cortex? An fMRI Study , 2002, Neuron.

[21]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[22]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[23]  H. Komatsu,et al.  Relationships between color, shape, and pattern selectivities of neurons in the inferior temporal cortex of the monkey. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  大原 貢,et al.  J.カプグラ・J.ルブ-ル-ラショ-著「慢性系統性妄想における《瓜二つ》の錯覚」(J.Capgras,J.Reboul-Lachaux;L′illusion des 《Sosies》 dans un delive systematise chronique--presentation de malade,Bull.Soci.Clin.Med.Ment.,11;6,1923) , 1978 .

[25]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Visual Awareness in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 1998, Neuron.

[26]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[27]  C. M. Mooney.  Age in the development of closure ability in children. , 1957, Canadian journal of psychology.

[28]  R. Weale.  Analysis of Visual Behaviour , 1983 .

[29]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Nonparametric estimation of temporal autocorrelation in FMRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[30]  Charles L. Wilson,et al.  Single Neuron Activity in Human Hippocampus and Amygdala during Recognition of Faces and Objects , 1997, Neuron.

[31]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the Macaque. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[34]  T. Allison,et al.  Human extrastriate visual cortex and the perception of faces, words, numbers, and colors. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  M. Tarr,et al.  FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  M. Hasselmo,et al.  The role of expression and identity in the face-selective responses of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the monkey , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[37]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[38]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Rapid visual learning in neurones of the primate temporal visual cortex. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[39]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[40]  M. Young,et al.  Sparse population coding of faces in the inferotemporal cortex. , 1992, Science.

[41]  R. Dolan,et al.  Contrast polarity and face recognition in the human fusiform gyrus , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  Frank Tong,et al.  The Face of Controversy , 2001, Science.

[43]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Vase or face? A neural correlate of shape-selective grouping processes in the human brain , 2001, NeuroImage.

[44]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[45]  Keiji Tanaka.  Mechanisms of visual object recognition: monkey and human studies , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[46]  Edmund T. Rolls,et al.  The role responses of expression and identity in the face-selective of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the monkey , 1989 .

[47]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Covert visual attention modulates face-specific activity in the human fusiform gyrus: fMRI study. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  J. Capgras,et al.  L'Illusion des 'sosies' dans un délire systématisé chronique , 1994 .

[49]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Activity in the Fusiform Gyrus Predicts Conscious Perception of Rubin's Vase–Face Illusion , 2002, NeuroImage.

[50]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[51]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Perception of facial characteristics by monkeys. , 1990 .

[54]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  A Cortical Area Selective for Visual Processing of the Human Body , 2001, Science.

[55]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[56]  Stephen A. Engel,et al.  Neural Response to Perception of Volume in the Lateral Occipital Complex , 2001, Neuron.

[57]  T A Polk,et al.  The neural development and organization of letter recognition: evidence from functional neuroimaging, computational modeling, and behavioral studies. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  Capgras delusion: a window on face recognition , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[59]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context , 1997, Nature.

[60]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  J. Haxby,et al.  Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[62]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[63]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[64]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area , 1998, Cognition.