The use of infrared sensors and digital cameras for documenting visitor use patterns: a case study from D'Aguilar National Park, south-east Queensland, Australia

This study assesses the use of pyroelectric infrared sensors combined with digital cameras to document visitor use patterns on a Horse Trail Network within an area of D'Aguilar National Park; a peri-urban bushland reserved for a range of purposes and used by several user-groups. Data were obtained from four cameras and comprised 7000 photographs over 1000 days. Forty-five percent of photographs were false triggers attributable to environmental factors and 42% were of confirmed users. An exercise aimed at assessing camera success revealed that in this study capture rates were in the order of 63% for cyclists, 82% for pedestrians, 90% of motor vehicles and 100% for horses. Sources of error can be minimised and primarily include the internal and external camera settings. Major advantages of infrared digital cameras include the portability of the technique, low cost, digital data format and discrimination of user types. In this case study, two-thirds of total observed visitor numbers occur on weekends and two-thirds of all use occurs during morning daylight. Cyclists were the most common user-group per day, followed in descending order by walkers, joggers, motorised users, dogs, bushwalkers, horse-riders and trail-bike riders. Implications of this data for management are discussed.

[1]  R. Kays,et al.  Quantifying the sensitivity of camera traps: an adapted distance sampling approach , 2011 .

[2]  Crowther,et al.  Comparison of methods to detect rare and cryptic species: A case study using the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) , 2009 .

[3]  Andreas Muhar,et al.  Monitoring options for visitor numbers in national parks and natural areas , 2003 .

[4]  Michael Stevens,et al.  A comparison of the effectiveness of camera trapping and live trapping for sampling terrestrial small-mammal communities , 2010 .

[5]  Arne Arnberger,et al.  Visitor monitoring methods for managing public use pressures in the Danube Floodplains National Park, Austria , 2003 .

[6]  Bart Kranstauber,et al.  Camera traps as sensor networks for monitoring animal communities , 2009, 2009 IEEE 34th Conference on Local Computer Networks.

[7]  D. Swann,et al.  Infrared-triggered cameras for detecting wildlife: an evaluation and review , 2004 .

[8]  Arne Arnberger,et al.  Methods for Visitor Monitoring in Recreational and Protected Areas : An Overview , 2002 .

[9]  Mattias Olsson,et al.  Effectiveness of a highway overpass to promote landscape connectivity and movement of moose and roe deer in Sweden , 2008 .

[10]  N. Roberts Investigation into survey techniques of large mammals: surveyor competence and camera-trapping vs. transect-sampling , 2011 .

[11]  W. Haider,et al.  Evaluating Visitor-Monitoring Techniques: A Comparison of Counting and Video Observation Data , 2005, Environmental management.

[12]  S. Nepal TOURISM IN PROTECTED AREAS , 2000 .

[13]  Walter M. Boyce,et al.  Estimating sizes of wild pig populations in the North and Central Coast regions of California , 2000 .

[14]  Wade L. Hadwen,et al.  Icons under threat: Why monitoring visitors and their ecological impacts in protected areas matters , 2007 .

[15]  D. Cole,et al.  Wilderness recreation use estimation: a handbook of methods and systems. , 2000 .

[16]  C. Brandenburg,et al.  Monitoring and management of visitor flows in recreational and protected areas : conference proceedings , 2002 .

[17]  Catherine Marina Pickering Literature Review of Horse Riding Impacts on Protected Areas and a Guide to the Development of an Assessment Program , 2008 .

[18]  S. Barry,et al.  Detection of medium-sized ground-dwelling mammals using infrared digital cameras: an alternative way forward? , 2010 .