Knowledge Transfer in a Multiple Virtual Communities Network

Widely discussed in the mass media, Web 2.0, or social software, has also drawn the attention of researchers, developing into a whole new research area. With Web 2.0's further development, corporations aim to adopt its technologies and transfer its benefits, such as enhanced collaboration and knowledge sharing, to their organizations. Whether any of these benefits also apply in an organizational context and whether there are further, still uncovered, benefits remains unclear. Furthermore, research in this area is still in its early stages, thus hampering progress towards qualitative and quantitative models that could provide answers. In order to encourage further progress in this area, we reviewed the existing research on corporate blogging and identified 24 articles that investigate the topic. Using the framework by Ives et al. [18], we categorized the articles for further analysis. By means of process theory, we build a conceptual model and identify the antecedents and consequences of internal corporate weblog usage. Our findings suggest that usage is driven by organizational culture, as well as by attitudes towards blogging. In addition, the benefits of weblog usage are centered on community benefits.

[1]  W. T. Tutte The dissection of equilateral triangles into equilateral triangles , 1948, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[2]  Martin Charles Golumbic,et al.  Graph Theory, Combinatorics and Algorithms: Interdisciplinary Applications , 2011 .

[3]  Martin Charles Golumbic,et al.  Graph Theory, Combinatorics and Algorithms , 2005 .

[4]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies , 2002 .

[5]  Kathleen M. Carley A Theory of Group Stability , 1991 .

[6]  George Kuk,et al.  Strategic Interaction and Knowledge Sharing in the KDE Developer Mailing List , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[7]  David Holman,et al.  Social networkers: Measuring and examining individual differences in propensity to connect with others , 2008, Soc. Networks.

[8]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Social Network Effects on the Extent of Innovation Diffusion: A Computer Simulation , 1997 .

[9]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Individual Centrality and Performance in Virtual R&D Groups: An Empirical Study , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[10]  John E. Sawyer,et al.  Virtualness and Knowledge in Teams: Managing the Love Triangle of Organizations, Individuals, and Information Technology , 2003, MIS Q..

[11]  F. Harary,et al.  Structural Models in Anthropology , 1986 .

[12]  Nancy M. Carlson,et al.  Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know , 2001 .

[13]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[14]  Van AlstyneMarshall,et al.  Global Village or Cyber-Balkans? Modeling and Measuring the Integration of Electronic Communities , 2005 .

[15]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[16]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Network Structure in Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[17]  S. Newell,et al.  The Role of Networks In the Diffusion of Technological Innovation , 1996 .

[18]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  Knowledge emergence : social, technical, and evolutionary dimensions of knowledge creation , 2001 .

[19]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[20]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[21]  R. Stanley,et al.  Enumerative Combinatorics: Index , 1999 .

[22]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  A Sender-Receiver Framework for Knowledge Transfer , 2005, MIS Q..

[23]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Organizational Improvisation and Organizational Memory , 1998 .

[24]  John A. Czepiel Word-of-Mouth Processes in the Diffusion of a Major Technological Innovation , 1974 .

[25]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  The Impact of IT on Market Information and Transparency: A Unified Theoretical Framework , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[26]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[27]  Nancy M. Dixon,et al.  Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know , 2000 .

[28]  Diane J. Hanson,et al.  E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age , 2003, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[29]  Alex Bavelas A Mathematical Model for Group Structures , 1948 .

[30]  James G. Oxley,et al.  Matroid theory , 1992 .

[31]  Miklos Sarvary,et al.  Leveraging the Customer Base: Creating Competitive Advantage Through Knowledge Management , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[32]  R. MacAvoy,et al.  Frictionless Commerce? A Comparison of Internet and Conventional Retailers , 1999 .

[33]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[34]  Andrew S. Tanenbaum,et al.  Computer Networks , 1981 .

[35]  Linton C. Freeman,et al.  Turning a profit from mathematics: The case of social networks , 1984 .

[36]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward A Theory of Knowledge Reuse : Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success , 2022 .

[37]  John Gallaugher,et al.  Understanding Network Effects in Software Markets: Evidence from Web Server Pricing , 2002, MIS Q..

[38]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[39]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[40]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures , 1998 .

[41]  D. Rogers,et al.  Sociometric Analysis of Interorganizational Relations; Application of Theory and Measurement. , 1974 .

[42]  Jeffrey J. Reuer,et al.  Asymmetric information and joint venture performance : Theory and evidence for domestic and international joint ventures , 2000 .

[43]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Global Village or Cyberbalkans: Modeling and Measuring the Integration of Electronic Communities , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[44]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Centrality in Social Networks , 1993 .

[45]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[46]  M. Zelen,et al.  Rethinking centrality: Methods and examples☆ , 1989 .

[47]  M. A. Beauchamp AN IMPROVED INDEX OF CENTRALITY. , 1965, Behavioral science.

[48]  D. West Introduction to Graph Theory , 1995 .

[49]  Harsha Aturupane Poverty, human development and growth : an emerging consensus? , 1994 .

[50]  F. Y. Wu Theory of resistor networks: the two-point resistance , 2004 .

[51]  F. Riggins,et al.  The growth of interorganizational systems in the presence of network externalities , 1994 .

[52]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Testing Alternative Theories of the Firm: Transaction Cost, Knowledge-Based, and Measurement Explanations for Make-or- Buy Decisions in Information Services , 1997 .

[53]  Nanette S. Levinson,et al.  Cross-national alliances and interorganizational learning , 1995 .