Multimarket Contact and Resource Dissimilarity: A Competitive Dynamics Perspective

Does the competitive dynamics perspective support the mutual forbearance (Edwards, 1955) and resource dissimilarity (Caves & Porter, 1977) theories of competitive behavior? This research examines competitive behavior in the U.S. software industry and finds: (1) as multimarket contact increases, a firm moves less frequently but more quickly following the moves of rivals; (2) as a firm’s resources are more dissimilar relative to rivals, it becomes more rivalrous along both action and timing dimensions of competitive behavior; and, (3) the influence of multimarket contact on firm-level action is most influential for firms whose resources are more dissimilar relative to rivals, but its influence on a firm’s time to move is most influential for firms whose resources are more similar relative to rivals. Thus, the dynamic perspective generally supports, but goes beyond, the insights of the established mutual forbearance and resource dissimilarity theories.

[1]  Curtis M. Grimm,et al.  Timing, order and durability of new product advantages with imitation , 2000 .

[2]  Walter J. Ferrier,et al.  The Role of Competitive Action in Market Share Erosion and Industry Dethronement: A Study of Industry Leaders and Challengers , 1999 .

[3]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  Multimarket Maneuvering in Uncertain Spheres of Influence: Resource Diversion Strategies , 1998 .

[4]  Johann Peter Murmann,et al.  Competition in a Multimarket Environment: The Case of Market Exit , 1997 .

[5]  Mark D. Choudhari.  The dynamics of competitive strategy , 1997 .

[6]  Carolyn Y. Woo,et al.  Hypercompetition in a Multimarket Environment: The Role of Strategic Similarity and Multimarket Contact in Competitive De-Escalation , 1996 .

[7]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  “Austrian” and Industrial Organization Perspectives on Firm-level Competitive Activity and Performance , 1996 .

[8]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Competitive Dynamics Of Interfirm Rivalry , 1996 .

[9]  R. Veliyath.  Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering , 1996 .

[10]  Max Chen.  Competitor analysis and interfirm riva-lry: toward a theoretical integration , 1996 .

[11]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Speed, Stealth, and Selective Attack: How Small Firms Differ From Large Firms in Competitive Behavior , 1995 .

[12]  R. Wilson,et al.  The predictive validity of the Karnani and Wernerfelt model of multipoint competition , 1995 .

[13]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Organizational Niches and the Dynamics of Organizational Founding , 1994 .

[14]  W. Evans,et al.  Living by the “Golden Rule”: Multimarket Contact in the U. S. Airline Industry , 1994 .

[15]  Richard A. D'Aveni,et al.  Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering , 1994 .

[16]  Danny Miller,et al.  SOURCES AND CONSEQUENCES OF COMPETITIVE INERTIA: A STUDY OF THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY. , 1994 .

[17]  David J. Miller,et al.  Competitive attack, retaliation and performance: An expectancy-valence framework , 1994 .

[18]  J. Dutton,et al.  Advances in strategic management , 1994 .

[19]  Clifford Winston,et al.  The Evolution of the Airline Industry , 1994 .

[20]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  Intra-industry structure and the response toward rivals , 1993 .

[21]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  BOARD OF DIRECTOR INVOLVEMENT IN RESTRUCTURING: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD VERSUS MANAGERIAL CONTROLS , 1993 .

[22]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[23]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Strategic Deterrence Among Multipoint Competitors , 1993 .

[24]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[25]  Ming-Jer Chen,et al.  Nonresponse and Delayed Response to Competitive Moves: The Roles of Competitor Dependence and Action Irreversibility , 1992 .

[26]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Action characteristics as predictors of competitive responses , 1992 .

[27]  Neil Gandal,et al.  NETWORK EFFECTS, SOFTWARE PROVISION, AND STANDARDIZATION* , 1992 .

[28]  M. Porter.  Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[29]  Beverly B. Tyler,et al.  Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives , 1991 .

[30]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[31]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Organizational Information Processing, Competitive Responses, and Performance in the U.S. Domestic Airline Industry , 1991 .

[32]  J. Daniels,et al.  The utilization of international joint ventures by United States firms in high technology industries , 1991 .

[33]  E. Mosakowski.  Organizational boundaries and economic performance: An empirical study of entrepreneurial computer firms , 1991 .

[34]  C. Hill,et al.  Are institutional investors myopic? A time‐series study of four technology‐driven industries , 1991 .

[35]  Richard N. Osborn,et al.  The role of technology in the formation and form of multinational cooperative arrangements , 1990 .

[36]  Charles J. Fombrun,et al.  Shifting gears: Enabling change in corporate aggressiveness , 1990 .

[37]  Marc J. Dollinger,et al.  The Evolution of Collective Strategies in Fragmented Industries , 1990 .

[38]  Richard A. Bettis,et al.  Financial returns and strategic interaction: The case of instant photography , 1987 .

[39]  W. Dugger.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[40]  Paolo Leon.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1986, The Antitrust Bulletin.

[41]  K. Palepu.  Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure , 1985 .

[42]  I. MacMillan,et al.  Competitors' responses to easily imitated new products—exploring commercial banking product introductions , 1985 .

[43]  Robert M. Feinberg.  Mutual forbearance as an extension of oligopoly theory , 1984 .

[44]  R. Caves,et al.  Economic Analysis and the Quest for Competitive Advantage , 1984 .

[45]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  Multiple Point Competition. , 1983 .

[46]  John T. Scott.  Multimarket Contact and Economic Performance , 1982 .

[47]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  SEIZING COMPETITIVE INITIATIVE , 1982 .

[48]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[49]  Lawrence R. Jauch,et al.  Structured Content Analysis of Cases: A Complementary Method for Organizational Research , 1980 .

[50]  D. Abell,et al.  Defining the Business: The Starting Point of Strategic Planning , 1980 .

[51]  M. Porter.  The Structure Within Industries and Companies' Performance , 1979 .

[52]  M. Porter,et al.  From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition , 1977 .

[53]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  D. Daryl Wyckoff,et al.  The domestic airline industry , 1977 .

[55]  M. Porter.  Interbrand Choice, Strategy, and Bilateral Market Power , 1977 .

[56]  C. F. Phillips.  Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance , 1971 .

[57]  C. D. Edwards,et al.  Conglomerate Bigness as a Source of Power , 1955 .

[58]  Joe S. Bain,et al.  Relation of Profit Rate to Industry Concentration: American Manufacturing, 1936–1940 , 1951 .

[59]  J. Schumpeter.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[60]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .