The temporal triangle: Response substitution in instrumental conditioning

[1]  A V Bacotti,et al.  Matching under concurrent fixed-ratio variable-interval schedules of food presentation. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  A. Brownstein.  Predicting instrumental performance from the independent rates of contingent responses in a choice situation. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  W. Baum,et al.  Time-based and count-based measurement of preference. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  J. Allison,et al.  Conservation in behavior , 1979 .

[5]  R. W. Schaeffer,et al.  THE REINFORCEMENT RELATION AS A FUNCTION OF INSTRUMENTAL RESPONSE BASE RATE. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  R. Gilbert,et al.  Schedule effects : drugs, drinking, and aggression , 1972 .

[7]  W M Baum,et al.  Choice as time allocation. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  J. Gibbon,et al.  Contingency spaces and measures in classical and instrumental conditioning. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  J. Staddon,et al.  The "supersitition" experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. , 1971 .

[10]  D. Premack,et al.  Choice and habituation as measures of response similarity. , 1970 .

[11]  A. G. Hundt,et al.  REINFORCEMENT OF DRINKING BY RUNNING: EFFECT OF FIXED RATIO AND REINFORCEMENT TIME. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  D. Premack.  Predicting instrumental performance from the independent rate of the contingent response. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  T. F. Gilbert.  Fundamental dimensional properties of the operant. , 1958, Psychological review.

[14]  M. Felton,et al.  The post-reinforcement pause. , 1966, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  R. M. Elliott,et al.  Behavior of Organisms , 1991 .

[16]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[17]  M. Seligman.  On the generality of the laws of learning , 1970 .

[18]  R Schuster,et al.  Indifference between punishment and free shock: evidence for the negative law of effect. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[19]  J. Schrot,et al.  5. Schedule-induced polydipsia: an analysis of water and alcohol ingestion , 1972 .

[20]  G. S. Reynolds,et al.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[21]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  What is the necessary and sufficient condition for reinforcement in the contingency situation? , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  K. Lewin.  The conceptual representation and the measurement of psychological forces , 1939 .

[23]  George Collier,et al.  Ecological determinants of reinforcement in the guinea pig. , 1974, Physiology & behavior.

[24]  D. Premack.  Prediction of the Comparative Reinforcement Values of Running and Drinking , 1963, Science.

[25]  J. Kagel,et al.  Economic Demand Theory and Psychological Studies of Choice1 , 1976 .

[26]  James G. Greeno,et al.  Elementary theoretical psychology , 1968 .

[27]  John J. Boren,et al.  Resistance to extinction as a function of the fixed ratio. , 1961 .

[28]  C. B. Ferster,et al.  Schedules of reinforcement , 1957 .

[29]  G. Collier,et al.  The ecological determinants of reinforcement in the rat. , 1972, Physiology & behavior.

[30]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Handbook of Operant Behavior , 2022 .

[31]  J. Falk.  Control of schedule-induced polydipsia: type, size, and spacing of meals. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[32]  P. Killeen.  On the temporal control of behavior. , 1975 .

[33]  W. Timberlake,et al.  Response deprivation: An empirical approach to instrumental performance , 1974 .