Modernization Programs in Perspective: Institutional Analysis of Organizational Change

Contemporary reform programs give students of comparative public administration a new chance to update their theoretical ideas about organization and organizing. Do forms of government and political institution matter? If so, what are the effects of different organizational forms? Why do we have the institutional forms we have? How can we explain their origins, persistence and development? This article explores the possible value of organization theory for the study of comprehensive administration reform. An attempt is made to specify how modernization efforts may be affected by properties of existing institutions. It is argued that contemporary modernization programs are based on an instrumental view of organizational decision-making and change. An institutional perspective is then outlined.

[1]  Kenneth A. Shepsle,et al.  Studying Institutions , 1989 .

[2]  Stephen D. Krasner.  Sovereignty , 1988 .

[3]  G. K. Fry.  THE THATCHER GOVERNMENT, THE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INITIATIVE, AND THE ‘NEW CML SERVICE’ , 1988 .

[4]  W. Scott.  The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. , 1987 .

[5]  Antoine Ambroise.  Political and Administrative Modernization in Quebec (1960-85) , 1987 .

[6]  Tom Christensen.  How to Succeed in Reorganizing: The Case of the Norwegian Health Administration* , 1987 .

[7]  C. Offe.  The Utopia of the Zero-Option. Modernity and Modernization as normative political Criteria , 1987 .

[8]  K. Basu,et al.  The Growth and Decay of Custom: The Role of the New Institutional Economics in Economic History , 1987 .

[9]  John Kay,et al.  Privatisation: A Policy in Search of a Rationale , 1986 .

[10]  Barbara Czarniawska.  The ugly sister: On relationships between the private and the public sectors in Sweden☆ , 1985 .

[11]  D. Wass.  THE CIVIL SERVICE AT THE CROSSROADS , 1985 .

[12]  T. Moe.  The New Economics of Organization , 1984 .

[13]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[14]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[15]  James G. March,et al.  Organizing Political Life: What Administrative Reorganization Tells Us about Government , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[16]  The Idea of Political Development: From Dignity to Efficiency , 1982 .

[17]  O. Williamson.  The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  J. March,et al.  Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol. , 1981 .

[19]  J. March.  Footnotes To Organizational Change , 1980 .

[20]  M. Landau,et al.  To Manage Is Not To Control: Or the Folly of Type II Errors , 1979 .

[21]  J. March.  Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice , 1978 .

[22]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  M. Hannan,et al.  The Population Ecology of Organizations , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  J. Bendor,et al.  A Theoretical Problem in Comparative Administration , 1976 .

[25]  George A. Akerlof.  An economic theorist's book of tales: The economics of caste and of the rat race and other woeful tales , 1976 .

[26]  G. Sheffer,et al.  The Management of Change in Government , 1976 .

[27]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  THE UNCERTAINTY OF THE PAST: ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING UNDER AMBIGUITY* , 1975 .

[28]  K. Jacobsen,et al.  PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION UNDER PRESSURE: THE ROLE OF THE EXPERT IN THE MODERNIZATION OF TRADITIONAL AGRICULTURE , 1966 .

[29]  H. Kaufman,et al.  Emerging Conflicts in the Doctrines of Public Administration , 1956, American Political Science Review.

[30]  R. Coase.  The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[31]  F. Adickes,et al.  Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft , 1908 .