Why Are Poor Comprehenders Inefficient Searchers? An Investigation into the Effects of Text Representation and Spatial Memory on the Ability To Locate Information in Text.

Good comprehenders were more efficient than poor comprehenders when they were required to locate specific pieces of information in a text, and there were qualitative differences in search strategies between the groups. However, the performance of the good comprehenders was more like that of poor comprehenders when they were required to search through a scrambled text, suggesting that their search was guided by their representation of the content of the text. Although the groups did not differ in performance on a test of spatial memory, or on their ability to remember the location of individual words in a text, the good comprehenders were better at remembering the order in which specific words appeared in a text. This finding again suggests that their superior search strategies may arise because of their better memory for the order of events in a text.

[1]  Jacqueline A. Haynes,et al.  Inducing Use of a Text Lookback Strategy Among Unsuccessful Readers , 1984 .

[2]  Cesare Cornoldi,et al.  Self‐monitoring in poor and good reading comprehenders and their use of strategy , 1998 .

[3]  John T. Guthrie,et al.  Literacy as Multidimensional: Locating Information and Reading Comprehension , 1987 .

[4]  E B Zechmeister,et al.  Recall of place on the page. , 1972, Journal of educational psychology.

[5]  Eileen Kintsch,et al.  Macroprocesses and Microprocesses in the Development of Summarization Skill , 1990 .

[6]  John T. Guthrie,et al.  Roles of Document Structure, Cognitive Strategy, and Awareness in Searching for Information. , 1991 .

[7]  Bonnie B. Armbruster,et al.  Locating Information in Text: A Focus on Children in the Elementary Grades , 1993 .

[8]  John T. Guthrie,et al.  Prior conceptual knowledge and textbook search , 1992 .

[9]  Children's Knowledge About Skimming. , 1980 .

[10]  Ruth Garner,et al.  Externalizing Question-Answering Strategies of Good and Poor Comprehenders. , 1983 .

[11]  Irwin S. Kirsch,et al.  Adult Reading Practices for Work and Leisure , 1984 .

[12]  Mariam Jean Dreher,et al.  Cognitive Processes in Textbook Chapter Search Tasks. , 1990 .

[13]  Irwin S. Kirsch,et al.  Distinctions between reading comprehension and locating information in text. , 1987 .

[14]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Referential continuity and the coherence of discourse , 1982, Cognition.

[15]  Marie D. Neale,et al.  THE NEALE ANALYSIS OF READING ABILITY — REVISED , 1986 .

[16]  Alden J. Moe,et al.  Perspectives on Reading Research and Instruction. Twenty-Ninth Yearbook of The National Reading Conference. , 1980 .

[17]  M. Just,et al.  Remembering the Location and Content of Sentences in a Prose Passage. , 1976 .

[18]  Rosemary J. Stevenson,et al.  Effects of Text Structure and Prior Knowledge of the Learner on Navigation in Hypertext , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[19]  Ruth Garner,et al.  Readers' acquisition of the components of the text-lookback strategy , 1984 .

[20]  Ron Reis,et al.  Monitoring and Resolving Comprehension Obstacles: An Investigation of Spontaneous Text Lookbacks among Upper-Grade Good and Poor Comprehenders. , 1981 .

[21]  Jacqueline Specht,et al.  Including Both Time and Accuracy in Defining Text Search Efficiency , 1994 .

[22]  Bonnie B. Armbruster,et al.  Reading and Questioning in Content Area Lessons , 1991 .