Theoretical issues on LTI systems that preserve signal richness

In this paper, theoretical issues about linear time invariant (LTI) systems that preserve signal richness are explored. This paper considers two particular definitions of signal richness and finds the necessary and sufficient conditions under which an LTI system preserves the richness property. Several examples are presented to clarify the issues involved in the problem. Paraunitary (PU) and unimodular matrices can be shown not to preserve richness unless they are constant matrices (or a delayed version in the PU case). Some richness preserving properties of cascaded systems are also investigated. A structured proof of the necessary and sufficient conditions is presented. The relationship between persistent excitation (PE) and the proposed definitions of richness is also described.

[1]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Necessary and sufficient conditions for LTI systems to preserve signal richness , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[2]  See-May Phoong,et al.  Antipodal paraunitary matrices and their application to OFDM systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  C. Richard Johnson,et al.  Parameter drift in LMS adaptive filters , 1986, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[4]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Transmultiplexers as precoders in modern digital communication: a tutorial review , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37512).

[5]  Paulo Sergio Ramirez,et al.  Fundamentals of Adaptive Filtering , 2002 .

[6]  Robert Bregovic,et al.  Multirate Systems and Filter Banks , 2002 .

[7]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Staying rich: LTI systems which preserve signal richness , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[8]  Anna Scaglione,et al.  Redundant filterbank precoders and equalizers. II. Blind channel estimation, synchronization, and direct equalization , 1999, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[9]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[10]  S. Haykin,et al.  Adaptive Filter Theory , 1986 .

[11]  P.P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Remarks on certain new methods for blind identification of FIR channels , 2004, Conference Record of the Thirty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2004..

[12]  Robert R. Bitmead,et al.  Persistence of excitation conditions and the convergence of adaptive schemes , 1984, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.