Chapter XXV Cultural Historical Activity Theory

This chapter reviews the origins, approaches and roles associated with the use of cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) in information systems (IS) research. The literature is reviewed and examples are discussed from IS and related fields of human-computer interaction (HCI), computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) and computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL), to illustrate the power of CHAT in IS research as well as its link to appropriate research methods. After explicating the value of its use, the chapter concludes by discussing theoretical and methodological implications of applications of CHAT in examining real-world problems in IS research.

[1]  Reijo Miettinen,et al.  Artifact Mediation in Dewey and in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory , 2001 .

[2]  Marc Berg,et al.  On Distribution, Drift and the Electronic Medical Record: Some Tools for a Sociology of the Formal , 1997, ECSCW.

[3]  David J. Gilmore,et al.  Interface design: have we got it wrong? , 1995, INTERACT.

[4]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  From paralyzing myths to expansive action: building computer-supported knowledge work into the curriculum from below , 2002, CSCL.

[5]  A. Luria,et al.  Cultural–Historical Activity Theory , 2010 .

[6]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  A Human Activity Approach to User Interfaces , 1989, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[8]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing , 2003 .

[9]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach To User Interface Design , 1990 .

[10]  Edith Maier.  Activity Theory as a Framework for Accommodating Cultural Factors in HCI Studies , 2005, Mensch & Computer Workshopband.

[11]  Kari Kuutti,et al.  Identifying potential CSCW applications by means of activity theory concepts: a case example , 1992, CSCW '92.

[12]  J. Gregory.  Sorcerer's apprentice : creating the electronic health record, re-inventing medical records and patient care , 2001 .

[13]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Expansive Visibilization of Work: An Activity-Theoretical Perspective , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[14]  Daisy Mwanza,et al.  Managing content in e-learning environments , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[15]  Jakob E. Bardram.  Plans as Situated Action: An Activity Theory Approach to Workflow Systems , 1997 .

[16]  Daisy Mwanza,et al.  Where Theory Meets Practice: A Case for an Activity Theory Based Methodology to Guide Computer System Design , 2001, INTERACT.

[17]  Y. Engeström,et al.  The change laboratory as a tool for transforming work , 1996 .

[18]  I. Verenikina,et al.  An activity theory framework for computer interface design , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, 2003. ITI 2003..

[19]  Ivo Widjaja,et al.  Structuration of activity: a view on human activity , 2005, OZCHI.

[20]  Reijo Miettinen,et al.  Object of Activity and Individual Motivation , 2005 .

[21]  Helen Hasan,et al.  Demonstrations of the Activity Theory Framework for Research in Information Systems , 2007, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[22]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  A re-examination of information seeking behaviour in the context of activity theory , 2006, Inf. Res..

[23]  Faraja Teddy Igira,et al.  The Situatedness of Work Practices and Organizational Culture - Implications for Information Systems Innovation Uptake , 2007, Organizational Dynamics of Technology-Based Innovation.

[24]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Mundane tool or object of affection?: the rise and fall of the Postal Buddy , 1995 .

[25]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Supporting intergenerational groups in computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW) , 2007, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[26]  M. Cole.  A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition , 1993 .

[27]  Jaakko Virkkunen,et al.  Transforming learning and knowledge creation on the shop floor , 2004 .

[28]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  The significance of context in information systems and organizational change , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[29]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[30]  Daisy Mwanza,et al.  Towards an activity-oriented design method for HCI research and practice , 2002 .

[31]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization , 2001 .

[32]  Olga Basharina.  AN ACTIVITY THEORY PERSPECTIVE ON STUDENT-REPORTED CONTRADICTIONS IN INTERNATIONAL TELECOLLABORATION , 2007 .

[33]  Sue Gordon.  Mature students learning statistics: The activity theory perspective , 1993 .

[34]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1997 .

[35]  Luiz Eduardo Galvão Martins,et al.  An approach to software requirements elicitation using precepts from activity theory , 1999, 14th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering.

[36]  Helmut Krueger,et al.  Activity theory and the practice of design: evaluation of a collaborative tangible user interface , 2004 .

[37]  J. Robbins,et al.  Contexts, Collaboration, and Cultural Tools: A Sociocultural Perspective on Researching Children's Thinking , 2005 .

[38]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Putting Vygotsky to Work: The Change Laboratory as an Application of Double Stimulation , 2007 .

[39]  M. Bunge.  Mind and Society , 2010 .

[40]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory and individual and social transformation. , 1999 .

[41]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments , 1999 .

[42]  Lisa C. Yamagata-Lynch,et al.  Using Activity Theory to Understand the Systemic Tensions Characterizing a Technology-Rich Introductory Astronomy Course , 2002 .

[43]  Tone Bratteteig,et al.  Human Action in Context A Discussion of Theories for Understanding Use of IT , 1999 .

[44]  R. Miettinen,et al.  The riddle of things: Activity theory and actor‐network theory as approaches to studying innovations , 1999 .

[45]  Activity Theory Framework for Implementation of a Laptop Initiative in Teacher Education , 2008 .

[46]  Mikko Korpela,et al.  Activity Analysis as a Method for Information Systems Development: General Introduction and Experiments from Nigeria and Finland , 2000, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[47]  J. Offer.  Mind and Society , 1988, Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind.

[48]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Methods & tools: The activity checklist: a tool for representing the “space” of context , 1999, INTR.

[49]  K. Kuutti.  Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research , 1995 .

[50]  David F. Redmiles,et al.  Opportunities for Extending Activity Theory for Studying Collaborative Software Development , 2003 .

[51]  Mikko Korpela,et al.  Activity Theory in information systems research and practice - theoretical underpinnings for an information systems development method , 2007, Inf. Res..

[52]  Alekseĭ Nikolaevich Leontʹev.  Problems of the development of the mind , 1981 .

[53]  W. R. Howard.  Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design , 2007 .

[54]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice , 1999 .

[55]  V. V. Davydov.  Perspectives on activity theory: The content and unsolved problems of activity theory , 1999 .

[56]  Michel Beaudouin-Lafon,et al.  Computer supported co-operative work , 1999 .

[57]  Christine Greenhow,et al.  Using activity-oriented design methods to study collaborative knowledge-building in e-learning courses within higher education , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[58]  Kari Kuutti,et al.  The Concept of Activity as a Basic Unit of Analysis for CSCW Research , 1991, ECSCW.

[59]  M. Cole,et al.  Cognitive Development: Its Cultural and Social Foundations , 1976 .

[60]  Mikko Korpela,et al.  Information Systems Research and Information Systems Practice in a Network of Activities , 2002, Social Thinking - Software Practice.