Attitude Dynamics With Limited Verbalisation Capabilities

This article offers a new perspective for research on opinion dynamics. It demonstrates the importance of the distinction of opinion and attitude, which originally has been discussed in literature on consumer behaviour. As opinions are verbalised attitudes not only biases in interpretation and adoption processes have to be considered but also verbalisation biases should be addressed. Such biases can be caused by language deficits or social norms. The model presented in this article captures the basic features of common opinion dynamic models and additionally biases in the verbalisation process. Further, it gives a first analysis of this model and shows that precision as bias in the verbalisation process can influence the dynamics significantly. Presenting and applying the concept of area of influential attitudes the impact of each parameter (selective attitude, selective interpretation, and precision) is analysed independently. Some preliminary results for combined effects are presented.

[1]  Albert Sydney Hornby,et al.  Oxford advanced learner\'s dictionary of current English / A S Hornby with A P Cowie, A C Gimson , 1975 .

[2]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[3]  Hans-Dieter Burkhard,et al.  Agent-Oriented Programming for Open Systems , 1995, ECAI Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages.

[4]  Andreas Flache,et al.  Understanding Complex Social Dynamics: A Plea For Cellular Automata Based Modelling , 1998, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[5]  Jaime Simão Sichman,et al.  MAS and Social Simulation: A Suitable Sommitment , 1998, MABS.

[6]  G. Nigel Gilbert,et al.  Simulation for the social scientist , 1999 .

[7]  刘江雪,et al.  LIN volume 11 issue 2 Cover and Back matter , 1975, Journal of Linguistics.

[8]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Mixing beliefs among interacting agents , 2000, Adv. Complex Syst..

[9]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  AGENT BASED SIMULATION OF DECISION PROCESS MIXING RATIONAL REASONING AND INFLUENCES FROM SOCIO-INFORMATIONAL NETWORKS: CASE STUDIES OF AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES ADOPTION BY FARMERS , 2001 .

[10]  F. Schweitzer,et al.  SOCIAL IMPACT MODELS OF OPINION DYNAMICS , 2001 .

[11]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[12]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[13]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Interacting Agents and Continuous Opinions Dynamics , 2001, cond-mat/0111494.