Just Luck: An Experimental Study of Risk Taking and Fairness

Choices involving risk significantly affect the distribution of income and wealth in society. This paper reports the results of the first experiment, to our knowledge, to study fairness views about risk-taking, specifically whether such views are based chiefly on ex ante opportunities or on ex post outcomes. We find that, even though many participants focus exclusively on ex ante opportunities, most favor some redistribution ex post. Many participants also make a distinction between ex post inequalities that reflect differences in luck and ex post inequalities that reflect differences in choices. These findings apply to both stakeholders and impartial spectators.

[1]  B. Fried.  Ex Ante/Ex Post , 2012 .

[2]  Alexander W. Cappelen,et al.  Social Preferences in the Lab: A Comparison of Students and a Representative Population , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  M. Krawczyk,et al.  ‘Give me a chance!’ An experiment in social decision under risk , 2010 .

[4]  Marc Fleurbaey,et al.  Assessing Risky Social Situations , 2010, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  M. Krawczyk.  A glimpse through the veil of ignorance: equality of opportunity and support for redistribution , 2010 .

[6]  J. Andreoni.  Social Image and the 50-50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects , 2009 .

[7]  Phu Nguyen-Van,et al.  Risk and Inequality Aversion in Social Dilemmas , 2009 .

[8]  Werner Güth,et al.  Attitudes toward private and collective risk in individual and strategic choice situations , 2008 .

[9]  Kenju Akai,et al.  Morals and Mores? Experimental Evidence on Equity and Equality from the US and Japan , 2008 .

[10]  Alexander W. Cappelen,et al.  The importance of moral reflection and self-reported data in a dictator game with production , 2008, Soc. Choice Welf..

[11]  Ramarao Desiraju,et al.  Equity and Adverse Selection , 2007 .

[12]  James Konow,et al.  Is fairness in the eye of the beholder? An impartial spectator analysis of justice , 2006, Soc. Choice Welf..

[13]  Alexander W. Cappelen,et al.  The Pluralism of Fairness Ideals: An Experimental Approach , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[14]  Alexander W. Cappelen,et al.  Responsibility in health care: a liberal egalitarian approach , 2005, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[15]  Christopher Ferrall,et al.  Solving Finite Mixture Models: Efficient Computation in Economics Under Serial and Parallel Execution , 2005 .

[16]  Zvi Safra,et al.  Ex-Post Egalitarianism and Legal Justice , 2005 .

[17]  D. Zizzo.  Inequality and Procedural Fairness in a Money Burning and Stealing Experiment , 2004 .

[18]  N. Frohlich,et al.  Modeling Other-Regarding Preferences and an Experimental Test , 2004 .

[19]  Daniel John Zizzo,et al.  Money burning and rank egalitarianism with random dictators , 2003 .

[20]  V. Babicky.  Fairness Under Risk: Insights from Dictator Games , 2003 .

[21]  M. Fleurbaey.  Equality of Resources Revisited* , 2002, Ethics.

[22]  Todd L. Cherry,et al.  Hardnose the Dictator , 2002 .

[23]  P. Vallentyne.  Brute Luck, Option Luck, and Equalityof Initial Opportunities* , 2002, Ethics.

[24]  M. Rabin,et al.  UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL PREFERENCES WITH SIMPLE TESTS , 2001 .

[25]  K. Lippert‐Rasmussen.  Egalitarianism, Option Luck, and Responsibility* , 2001, Ethics.

[26]  James Konow,et al.  Fair Shares: Accountability and Cognitive Dissonance in Allocation Decisions , 2000 .

[27]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition , 2000 .

[28]  E. Fehr.  A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation , 1998 .

[29]  D. Sappington.  Incentives in Principal-Agent Relationships , 1991 .

[30]  Richard J. Arneson.  Equality and equal opportunity for welfare , 1989 .

[31]  Peter J. Hammond,et al.  Ex-ante and Ex-post Welfare Optimality under Uncertainty , 1981 .

[32]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Estimation and Inference in Nonlinear Structural Models , 1974 .

[33]  Peter A. Diamond,et al.  Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparison of Utility: Comment , 1967, Journal of Political Economy.

[34]  John C. Harsanyi,et al.  Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility , 1955, Journal of Political Economy.

[35]  Alexander Brown.  Equality of Resources , 2009 .

[36]  M. Krawczyk,et al.  Social decisions under risk. Evidence from the probabilistic dictator game , 2008 .

[37]  Alberto Alesina,et al.  Fairness and redistribution , 2005 .

[38]  J. Guilbert.  The world health report 2002 - reducing risks, promoting healthy life. , 2003, Education for health.

[39]  Martin Strobel,et al.  Inequality Aversion, Efficiency, and Maximin Preferences in Simple Distribution Experiments , 2002 .

[40]  Andrew J. Oswald,et al.  Are People Willing to Pay to Reduce Others' Incomes? , 2001 .

[41]  Andrew J. Oswald,et al.  Are People Willing to Pay to Reduce Others'Incomes? , 2000 .

[42]  Garey Ramey,et al.  Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics at Yale University , 1995 .

[43]  Stephen Coate,et al.  Altruism, the Samaritan's Dilemma, and Government Transfer Policy , 1995 .

[44]  J. Shogren.  An experiment on Coasian bargaining over ex ante lotteries and ex post rewards , 1990 .

[45]  Ronald Dworkin,et al.  What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources , 1981 .

[46]  Ronald Dworkin,et al.  What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare , 1981 .

[47]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Fairness, Risk Preferences and Independence: Impossibility Theorems , 2022 .