The Evolution of Renewable Energy Price Policies Based on Improved Bass Model: A System Dynamics (SD) Analysis

Many countries in the world have implemented many price support policies to promote the development of renewable energy, and there are evolutionary processes between different policies at different stages of national development. Existing literature has less research on the internal mechanism and alternative process of renewable energy price policies’ evolution process. In view of this, this paper innovatively introduces the classic model of innovation diffusion theory, the Bass model, into the renewable energy price mechanism, and improves it on the basis of the traditional Bass model, and then proposes a system dynamics (SD) simulation based on the improved Bass model to study the evolution process of the renewable energy price policies. This paper mainly studies the evolution process of the policies from feed-in tariff (FIT) to renewable portfolio standard (RPS), and takes China’s wind power industry as an example to simulate the model. The results show that FIT can effectively and quickly evolve to RPS based on the internal influence of the interaction among power generation enterprises and the external influence of government behaviors. All the power generation enterprises will implement RPS, and the amount of green power enterprises eventually grows steadily and slowly. In addition, increasing the decline rate of FIT subsidy and RPS unit fine can effectively promote the evolution of RPS policy, and also improve the amount of green power enterprises and the activity of the tradable green certificates (TGC) trading market.

[1]  Trine Krogh Boomsma,et al.  Market and policy risk under different renewable electricity support schemes , 2015 .

[2]  Daniel Pinheiro Bernardon,et al.  Projection of the diffusion of photovoltaic systems in residential low voltage consumers , 2018 .

[3]  Zeng Ming,et al.  Overall review of renewable energy tariff policy in China: Evolution, implementation, problems and countermeasures , 2013 .

[4]  Wei Li,et al.  Present situation and future prospect of renewable energy in China , 2017 .

[5]  Zuo Yi,et al.  The policy effects of feed-in tariff and renewable portfolio standard: A case study of China's waste incineration power industry. , 2017, Waste management.

[6]  P. Fokaides,et al.  The future of the Feed-in Tariff (FiT) scheme in Europe: The case of photovoltaics , 2016 .

[7]  Zhao Xin-gang,et al.  The development of China's biomass power industry under feed-in tariff and renewable portfolio standard: A system dynamics analysis , 2017 .

[8]  Chee Wei Tan,et al.  A comprehensive review of maximum power point tracking algorithms for photovoltaic systems , 2014 .

[9]  Zhao Xin-gang,et al.  The development of the renewable energy power industry under feed-in tariff and renewable portfolio standard: A case study of China's wind power industry , 2017 .

[10]  Veronica Soebarto,et al.  Facilitating the transition to sustainable construction: China's policies , 2016 .

[11]  Lívia Moraes Marques Benvenutti,et al.  Long term diffusion dynamics of alternative fuel vehicles in Brazil , 2017 .

[12]  Changgui Dong,et al.  Feed-in tariff vs. renewable portfolio standard: An empirical test of their relative effectiveness in promoting wind capacity development , 2012 .

[13]  Yi Zuo,et al.  The Development of the Renewable Energy Power Industry under Feed-In Tariff and Renewable Portfolio Standard: A Case Study of China’s Photovoltaic Power Industry , 2017 .

[14]  I. Soares,et al.  Analysis of the promotion of onshore wind energy in the EU: Feed-in tariff or renewable portfolio standard? , 2017 .

[15]  Tae-hyeong Kwon,et al.  Rent and rent-seeking in renewable energy support policies: Feed-in tariff vs. renewable portfolio standard , 2015 .

[16]  Lucia Baur,et al.  Diffusion of photovoltaic technology in Germany: A sustainable success or an illusion driven by guaranteed feed-in tariffs? , 2018 .

[17]  Koji Shimada,et al.  Evolution from the renewable portfolio standards to feed-in tariff for the deployment of renewable energy in Japan , 2017 .

[18]  Andrew Ford,et al.  Simulating price patterns for tradable green certificates to promote electricity generation from wind , 2007 .

[19]  Eunnyeong Heo,et al.  Prices versus quantities: Comparing economic efficiency of feed-in tariff and renewable portfolio standard in promoting renewable electricity generation , 2018 .

[20]  Anderson Rodrigo de Queiroz,et al.  An overview of incentive policies for the expansion of renewable energy generation in electricity power systems and the Brazilian experience , 2017 .

[21]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .

[22]  Rongda Jia,et al.  The Sustainable Development of the Economic-Energy-Environment (3E) System under the Carbon Trading (CT) Mechanism: A Chinese Case , 2018 .

[23]  Bryan Maybee,et al.  Overlapping carbon pricing and renewable support schemes under political uncertainty: Global lessons from an Australian case study , 2017 .

[24]  J. Schallenberg-Rodríguez Renewable electricity support systems: Are feed-in systems taking the lead? , 2017 .

[25]  Stefan Spinler,et al.  The Structural Impact of Renewable Portfolio Standards and Feed-in-Tariffs on Electricity Markets , 2014 .