Boosts in brain signal variability track liberal shifts in decision bias

Adopting particular decision biases allows organisms to tailor their choices to environmental demands. For example, a liberal response strategy pays off when target detection is crucial, whereas a conservative strategy is optimal for avoiding false alarms. Using conventional time-frequency analysis of human electroencephalographic (EEG) activity, we previously showed that bias setting entails adjustment of evidence accumulation in sensory regions (Kloosterman et al., 2019), but the presumed prefrontal signature of a conservative-to-liberal bias shift has remained elusive. Here, we show that a liberal bias shift is reflected in a more unconstrained neural regime (boosted entropy) in frontal regions that is suited to the detection of unpredictable events. Overall EEG variation, spectral power and event-related potentials could not explain this relationship, highlighting that moment-to-moment neural variability uniquely tracks bias shifts. Neural variability modulation through prefrontal cortex appears instrumental for permitting an organism to adapt its biases to environmental demands.

[1]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Review Moment-to-moment Brain Signal Variability: a next Frontier in Human Brain Mapping? , 2022 .

[2]  Nitzan Censor,et al.  Neural Variability Quenching Predicts Individual Perceptual Abilities , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Sarah Marzen,et al.  The evolution of lossy compression , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[4]  W. T. Maddox,et al.  Multiple brain networks contribute to the acquisition of bias in perceptual decision-making , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[5]  Aggelos K. Katsaggelos,et al.  Signal Processing and Communications , 2001 .

[6]  Madalena Costa,et al.  Multiscale entropy analysis of complex physiologic time series. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[7]  Moritz Grosse-Wentrup,et al.  Multisubject Learning for Common Spatial Patterns in Motor-Imagery BCI , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[8]  Pere Caminal,et al.  Refined Multiscale Entropy: Application to 24-h Holter Recordings of Heart Period Variability in Healthy and Aortic Stenosis Subjects , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  L. Pinneo On noise in the nervous system. , 1966, Psychological review.

[10]  R. Romo,et al.  The role of fluctuations in perception , 2008, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  J. Richman,et al.  Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[12]  Rishidev Chaudhuri,et al.  The intrinsic attractor manifold and population dynamics of a canonical cognitive circuit across waking and sleep , 2019, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  K. Linkenkaer-Hansen,et al.  Long-Range Temporal Correlations and Scaling Behavior in Human Brain Oscillations , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Sandro Romani,et al.  Discrete attractor dynamics underlies persistent activity in the frontal cortex , 2019, Nature.

[16]  Anne E. Urai,et al.  Choice History Biases Subsequent Evidence Accumulation , 2018, bioRxiv.

[17]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Analyzing Neural Time Series Data: Theory and Practice , 2014 .

[18]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Noise during Rest Enables the Exploration of the Brain's Dynamic Repertoire , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[19]  J. Bakdash,et al.  Repeated Measures Correlation , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[20]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[21]  C. Cassanello,et al.  Frontal Eye Field Neurons Signal Changes in Decision Criteria , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  J. Rinzel,et al.  Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[24]  C. Grady,et al.  The Importance of Being Variable , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Probabilistic Decision Making by Slow Reverberation in Cortical Circuits , 2002, Neuron.

[26]  G. Woodman,et al.  Event-related potential studies of attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[28]  R. Fisher FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF THE VALUES OF THE CORRELATION COEFFIENTS IN SAMPLES FROM AN INDEFINITELY LARGE POPU;ATION , 1915 .

[29]  Rufin VanRullen,et al.  Four Common Conceptual Fallacies in Mapping the Time Course of Recognition , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[30]  Irene E. Nagel,et al.  Amphetamine modulates brain signal variability and working memory in younger and older adults , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Niels A. Kloosterman,et al.  Dynamic modulation of decision biases by brainstem arousal systems , 2017, eLife.

[32]  Anne E. Urai,et al.  Confirmation Bias through Selective Overweighting of Choice-Consistent Evidence , 2018, Current Biology.

[33]  Jonas Obleser,et al.  Dopaminergic modulation of hemodynamic signal variability and the functional connectome during cognitive performance , 2017, NeuroImage.

[34]  Nelson J. Trujillo-Barreto,et al.  Induced gamma band responses in human EEG after the control of miniature saccadic artifacts , 2011, NeuroImage.

[35]  Stephen M Fleming,et al.  Overcoming status quo bias in the human brain , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Brain noise is task dependent and region specific. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[38]  R. Dolan,et al.  The neural basis of metacognitive ability , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  S. Cole,et al.  Brain Oscillations and the Importance of Waveform Shape , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  I. Dinstein,et al.  The Relationship between Trial-by-Trial Variability and Oscillations of Cortical Population Activity , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[41]  S. Jones When brain rhythms aren't ‘rhythmic’: implication for their mechanisms and meaning , 2016, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[42]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks , 2008, Neural Computation.

[43]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Stochastic dynamics as a principle of brain function , 2009, Progress in Neurobiology.

[44]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Cognitive and neural mechanisms of decision biases in recognition memory. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[45]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  The multiscale entropy: Guidelines for use and interpretation in brain signal analysis , 2016, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[46]  David J. Heeger,et al.  Neural variability: friend or foe? , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[47]  Ulman Lindenberger,et al.  Humans strategically shift decision bias by flexibly adjusting sensory evidence accumulation , 2019, eLife.

[48]  Hauke R. Heekeren,et al.  Age-Related Decline in Brain Resources Modulates Genetic Effects on Cognitive Functioning , 2008, Front. Neurosci..

[49]  Christopher Summerfield,et al.  Metacognition in human decision-making: confidence and error monitoring , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics notes: Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 1—correlation within subjects , 1995 .

[51]  C. Grady,et al.  The modulation of BOLD variability between cognitive states varies by age and processing speed. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[52]  Markus Werkle-Bergner,et al.  On the estimation of brain signal entropy from sparse neuroimaging data , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[53]  J. Obleser,et al.  Local cortical desynchronization and pupil-linked arousal differentially shape brain states for optimal sensory performance , 2019, eLife.

[54]  Henrik Walter,et al.  The left inferior frontal gyrus is involved in adjusting response bias during a perceptual decision-making task , 2014, Brain and behavior.

[55]  A. Compte,et al.  Bump attractor dynamics in prefrontal cortex explains behavioral precision in spatial working memory , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[56]  Johannes J. Fahrenfort,et al.  Masking Disrupts Reentrant Processing in Human Visual Cortex , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[57]  Jack W. Tsao,et al.  Observed brain dynamics, P.P. Mitra, H. Bokil. Oxford University Press (2008), ISBN-13: 978-0-19-517808-1, 381 pages, $65.00 , 2009 .

[58]  Douglas D. Garrett,et al.  Standard multiscale entropy reflects spectral power at mismatched temporal scales: What’s signal irregularity got to do with it? , 2019, bioRxiv.

[59]  T. Knapen,et al.  Decision-related pupil dilation reflects upcoming choice and individual bias , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  Thad A. Polk,et al.  Higher performers upregulate brain signal variability in response to more feature-rich visual input , 2018, NeuroImage.

[61]  Niels A. Kloosterman,et al.  Top-down modulation in human visual cortex predicts the stability of a perceptual illusion. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[62]  Joshua I. Gold,et al.  Pupil Size as a Window on Neural Substrates of Cognition , 2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[63]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Cortical activity is more stable when sensory stimuli are consciously perceived , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Causal evidence for frontal cortex organization for perceptual decision making , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[65]  T. Yarkoni Big Correlations in Little Studies: Inflated fMRI Correlations Reflect Low Statistical Power—Commentary on Vul et al. (2009) , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[66]  Andrew M. Clark,et al.  Stimulus onset quenches neural variability: a widespread cortical phenomenon , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[67]  Ann M Hermundstad,et al.  Adaptive coding for dynamic sensory inference , 2017, bioRxiv.

[68]  M Doppelmayr,et al.  A method for the calculation of induced band power: implications for the significance of brain oscillations. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[69]  S. Kelly,et al.  A supramodal accumulation-to-bound signal that determines perceptual decisions in humans , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[70]  T. Brismar,et al.  Comment on "Multiscale entropy analysis of complex physiologic time series". , 2004, Physical review letters.