Cardiovascular birth defects and prenatal exposure to female sex hormones: a reevaluation of data reanalysis from a large prospective study.

In data of the U.S. Collaborative Perinatal Study (CPS), the Drug Epidemiology Unit (DEU) reported a relative risk of about 2.3 between maternal female sex hormone exposure during months 1 to 4 of pregnancy and cardiovascular malformation in infants (Heinonen et al., '77a N. Engl. J. Med., 296:67-70). Wiseman and Dodds-Smith ('84, Teratology, 30:359-370) reexamined the original CPS data and found the DEU had made some errors in classification of exposure and disease. Also they challenged the classification of cases as "exposed" in those born to mothers who received the compounds outside the day 19 to 50 window of cardiovascular embryogenesis. Wiseman and Dodds-Smith stated that their reanalysis "clearly showed that there was [in the data used by the DEU] no statistically significant association between exposure in the critical organogenic period of pregnancy and cardiac malformation in offspring." They did not undertake any statistical analysis, but their reanalysis resulted in a wide-spread nonacceptance of the association reported by the DEU. The study reported here reclassified the cases of the original DEU study in accord with the implications of the Wiseman and Dodds-Smith reanalysis of exposure and disease. After this reclassification, an effect magnitude measure of association, the relative risk rose from 2.33 to 2.48 and remained nominally significant statistically at the .05 level. Thus, if anything, the quantitative consequences of the Wiseman and Dodds-Smith review of the data, when applied in an unbiased manner, result in an increase in the measure of effect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  Cardiovascular birth defects and antenatal exposure to female sex hormones. , 1977, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  S. Korones,et al.  Congenital Heart Disease in 56,109 Births Incidence and Natural History , 1971, Circulation.

[3]  H Checkoway,et al.  Bias due to misclassification in the estimation of relative risk. , 1977, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  E. Hook ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS AND HUMAN BIRTH DEFECTS: INTERPRETATION OF RELATIVE RISKS IN CLINICAL GENETICS , 1986 .

[5]  R. Macdonald Does treatment with progesterone prevent miscarriage? , 1989, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[6]  R. Regal,et al.  Conceptus viability, malformation, and suspect mutagens or teratogens in humans. The Yule-Simpson paradox and implications for inferences of causality in studies of mutagenicity or teratogenicity limited to human livebirths. , 1991, Teratology.

[7]  Z. Katz,et al.  Teratogenicity of Progestogens Given During the First Trimester of Pregnancy , 1985, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  R. A. Wiseman,et al.  Cardiovascular birth defects and antenatal exposure to female sex hormones: a reevaluation of some base data. , 1984, Teratology.

[9]  S. C. Mitchell,et al.  Etiologic correlates in a study of congenital heart disease in 56,109 births. , 1971, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  G. Matanoski,et al.  Maternal hormone therapy and congenital heart disease. , 1980, Teratology.

[11]  R. Regal,et al.  Interrelationships of Relative Risks of Birth Defects in Embryonic and Fetal Deaths, in Livebirths, and in All Conceptuses , 1992, Epidemiology.