A wearable mobility assessment device for total knee replacement: A longitudinal feasibility study.

BACKGROUND Total knee replacement currently lacks robust indications and objective follow-up metrics. Patients and healthcare staff are under-equipped to optimise outcomes. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of using an ear-worn motion sensor (e-AR, Imperial College London) to conduct objective, home-based mobility assessments in the peri-operative setting. METHODS Fourteen patients on the waiting list for knee replacement, and 15 healthy subjects, were recruited. Pre-operatively, and at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 weeks post-operatively, patients underwent functional mobility testing (Timed Up and Go), knee examination (including range of motion), and an activity protocol whilst wearing the e-AR sensor. Features extracted from sensor motion data were used to assess patient performance and predict patients' recovery phase. RESULTS Sensor-derived peri-operative mobility trends correlated with clinical measures in several activities, allowing functional recovery of individual subjects to be profiled and compared, including the detection of a complication. Sensor data features enabled classification of subjects into normal, pre-operative and 24-week post-operative groups with 89% (median) accuracy. Classification accuracy was reduced to 69% when including all time intervals. DISCUSSION This study demonstrates a novel, objective method of assessing peri-operative mobility, which could be used to supplement surgical decision-making and facilitate community-based follow-up.

[1]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Predicting Free-Living Energy Expenditure Using a Miniaturized Ear-Worn Sensor: An Evaluation Against Doubly Labeled Water , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  F. Wolfe,et al.  Determinants of WOMAC function, pain and stiffness scores: evidence for the role of low back pain, symptom counts, fatigue and depression in osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia. , 1999, Rheumatology.

[3]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Gait Parameter Estimation From a Miniaturized Ear-Worn Sensor Using Singular Spectrum Analysis and Longest Common Subsequence , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  J. O'Connor,et al.  A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  S. Nadeau,et al.  Development and validation of an innovative tool for the assessment of biomechanical strategies: the Timed "Up and Go" - Assessment of Biomechanical Strategies (TUG-ABS) for individuals with stroke. , 2013, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[6]  L. Weidenhielm,et al.  Improvement in gait one year after surgery for knee osteoarthrosis: a comparison between high tibial osteotomy and prosthetic replacement in a prospective randomized study. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[7]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Knee scoring systems in gonarthrosis. Evaluation of interobserver variability and the envelope of bias. Score Assessment Group. , 1997, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[8]  P Tugwell,et al.  The MACTAR Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire--an individualized functional priority approach for assessing improvement in physical disability in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1987, The Journal of rheumatology.

[9]  R. Bourne,et al.  What Is the Best Way of Assessing Outcome After Total Knee Replacement? , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  M. Bergner,et al.  The sickness impact profile. Development of an outcome measure of health care. , 1975, American journal of public health.

[11]  Henrica C W de Vet,et al.  Construct validity of the DynaPort KneeTest: a comparison with observations of physical therapists. , 2005, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[12]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Validation of an ear-worn sensor for gait monitoring using a force-plate instrumented treadmill , 2012, Gait & Posture.

[13]  R. C. Lummel,et al.  Measuring functional abilities of patients with knee problems: rationale and construction of the DynaPort knee test , 2002, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[14]  Arnold D. M. Kester,et al.  Functional improvement after unicompartmental knee replacement: a follow-up study with a performance based knee test , 2007, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[15]  L. Broström,et al.  Changes in walking ability after knee replacement , 2004, International Orthopaedics.

[16]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Detection and Analysis of Transitional Activity in Manifold Space , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[17]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. , 2000, Physical therapy.