Nozzle design parameters and their effects on rapid sample delivery in flow cytometry.

BACKGROUND Rapid kinetic and high throughput flow cytometry are emerging as valuable tools in biotechnology research applications ranging from mechanistic analysis of molecular assemblies to high throughput screening. Many of these new applications have been made possible by improved sample delivery capabilities, focusing increased attention on fluidic issues associated with rapid sample delivery. METHODS Using basic fluidic premises, we derived a model that predicted the effect of nozzle parameters during rapid sample delivery. We tested the model using the rapid mix flow cytometer and modifications were made to the equipment to optimize performance. RESULTS The model predicted that shorter nozzles with wide exit orifices decrease the delay before initial particle analysis and the fluidic stabilization time. Experimental results confirmed this prediction and model-based modifications allowed analysis of particles within 55 ms or 600 ms after mixing, with or without electronic gating, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The model along with modifications to commercial equipment will allow rapid mix flow cytometry to analyze reactions in time frames threefold shorter than previously possible. The model allows for nozzle design predictions that should allow for analysis in the millisecond time frame. Furthermore, these findings are general for all rapid delivery applications, including high throughput flow cytometry.

[1]  V Kachel,et al.  A new flow cytometric transducer for fast sample throughput and time resolved kinetic studies of biological cells and other particles. , 1982, Cytometry.

[2]  Nolan,et al.  Flow cytometry: a versatile tool for all phases of drug discovery. , 1999, Drug discovery today.

[3]  L A Sklar,et al.  High throughput flow cytometry. , 2001, Cytometry.

[4]  J. Martin,et al.  Time: a new parameter for kinetic measurements in flow cytometry. , 1980, Science.

[5]  A. M. Young,et al.  A microfabricated flow chamber for optical measurements in fluids , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Systems.

[6]  J F Dunne,et al.  Time window analysis and sorting. , 1991, Cytometry.

[7]  Kenneth A. Johnson,et al.  1 Transient-State Kinetic Analysis of Enzyme Reaction Pathways , 1992 .

[8]  S. Quake,et al.  A microfabricated fluorescence-activated cell sorter , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  K A Kelley,et al.  Sample station modification providing on-line reagent addition and reduced sample transit time for flow cytometers. , 1989, Cytometry.

[10]  Louis Scampavia,et al.  Coaxial flow mixer for real‐time monitoring of cellular responses in flow cytometry , 1996 .

[11]  J Ruzicka,et al.  Fast kinetic measurements and on-line dilution by flow injection cytometry. , 1994, Cytometry.

[12]  L. Sklar,et al.  Kinetic analysis of human flap endonuclease-1 by flow cytometry. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[13]  L A Sklar,et al.  A convenient on-line device for reagent addition, sample mixing, and temperature control of cell suspensions in flow cytometry. , 1985, Cytometry.

[14]  L A Sklar,et al.  Sheath fluid control to permit stable flow in rapid mix flow cytometry. , 1999, Cytometry.

[15]  J Ruzicka,et al.  A coaxial jet mixer for rapid kinetic analysis in flow injection and flow injection cytometry. , 1995, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  L A Sklar,et al.  A rapid mix flow cytometer with subsecond kinetic resolution. , 1995, Cytometry.