An analysis toolbox to explore mesenchymal migration heterogeneity reveals adaptive switching between distinct modes

Mesenchymal (lamellipodial) migration is heterogeneous, although whether this reflects progressive variability or discrete, 'switchable' migration modalities, remains unclear. We present an analytical toolbox, based on quantitative single-cell imaging data, to interrogate this heterogeneity. Integrating supervised behavioral classification with multivariate analyses of cell motion, membrane dynamics, cell-matrix adhesion status and F-actin organization, this toolbox here enables the detection and characterization of two quantitatively distinct mesenchymal migration modes, termed 'Continuous' and 'Discontinuous'. Quantitative mode comparisons reveal differences in cell motion, spatiotemporal coordination of membrane protrusion/retraction, and how cells within each mode reorganize with changed cell speed. These modes thus represent distinctive migratory strategies. Additional analyses illuminate the macromolecular- and cellular-scale effects of molecular targeting (fibronectin, talin, ROCK), including 'adaptive switching' between Continuous (favored at high adhesion/full contraction) and Discontinuous (low adhesion/inhibited contraction) modes. Overall, this analytical toolbox now facilitates the exploration of both spontaneous and adaptive heterogeneity in mesenchymal migration. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11384.001

[1]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Fibroblasts Lead the Way: A Unified View of 3D Cell Motility. , 2015, Trends in cell biology.

[2]  Hamdah Shafqat-Abbasi,et al.  Non-monotonic cellular responses to heterogeneity in talin protein expression-level. , 2015, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[3]  Hamdah Shafqat-Abbasi,et al.  Disentangling Membrane Dynamics and Cell Migration; Differential Influences of F-actin and Cell-Matrix Adhesions , 2015, PloS one.

[4]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Functional hierarchy of redundant actin assembly factors revealed by fine-grained registration of intrinsic image fluctuations. , 2015, Cell systems.

[5]  Mark R Morgan,et al.  Emerging properties of adhesion complexes: what are they and what do they do? , 2015, Trends in cell biology.

[6]  S. Strömblad,et al.  A plastic relationship between vinculin-mediated tension and adhesion complex area defines adhesion size and lifetime , 2015, Nature Communications.

[7]  Kwang-Hyun Cho,et al.  Network-based identification of feedback modules that control RhoA activity and cell migration. , 2015, Journal of molecular cell biology.

[8]  Jean-François Rupprecht,et al.  Actin Flows Mediate a Universal Coupling between Cell Speed and Cell Persistence , 2015, Cell.

[9]  Erin L. Barnhart,et al.  Balance between cell−substrate adhesion and myosin contraction determines the frequency of motility initiation in fish keratocytes , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  M. Welch,et al.  Cell Migration, Freshly Squeezed , 2015, Cell.

[11]  Monika Ritsch-Marte,et al.  Cortical Contractility Triggers a Stochastic Switch to Fast Amoeboid Cell Motility , 2015, Cell.

[12]  Andrew Callan-Jones,et al.  Confinement and Low Adhesion Induce Fast Amoeboid Migration of Slow Mesenchymal Cells , 2015, Cell.

[13]  Lennart Martens,et al.  An open data ecosystem for cell migration research. , 2015, Trends in cell biology.

[14]  P. Friedl,et al.  Plasticity of the actin cytoskeleton in response to extracellular matrix nanostructure and dimensionality. , 2014, Biochemical Society transactions.

[15]  M. Nussenzweig,et al.  Generation of compartmentalized pressure by a nuclear piston governs cell motility in a 3D matrix , 2014, Science.

[16]  J. Tyrcha,et al.  Plasticity in the Macromolecular-Scale Causal Networks of Cell Migration , 2014, PloS one.

[17]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Focal adhesion size uniquely predicts cell migration , 2013, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[18]  Anne Straube,et al.  Directional persistence of migrating cells requires Kif1C-mediated stabilization of trailing adhesions. , 2012, Developmental cell.

[19]  Ulrich S Schwarz,et al.  United we stand – integrating the actin cytoskeleton and cell–matrix adhesions in cellular mechanotransduction , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[20]  Steven J. Altschuler,et al.  Network Crosstalk Dynamically Changes during Neutrophil Polarization , 2012, Cell.

[21]  Stephanie Alexander,et al.  Cancer Invasion and the Microenvironment: Plasticity and Reciprocity , 2011, Cell.

[22]  Helene Andersson-Svahn,et al.  Analysis of transient migration behavior of natural killer cells imaged in situ and in vitro. , 2011, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[23]  Ann Pellegrini.  Movement , 2011 .

[24]  M. Schwartz.  Integrins and extracellular matrix in mechanotransduction. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[25]  Clare M Waterman,et al.  Mechanical integration of actin and adhesion dynamics in cell migration. , 2010, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[26]  S. Strömblad,et al.  Integrin-mediated Cell Attachment Induces a PAK4-dependent Feedback Loop Regulating Cell Adhesion through Modified Integrin αvβ5 Clustering and Turnover , 2010, Molecular biology of the cell.

[27]  Bernd Fischer,et al.  CellCognition: time-resolved phenotype annotation in high-throughput live cell imaging , 2010, Nature Methods.

[28]  Martin A. Schwartz,et al.  Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[29]  A. Hyman,et al.  Live-cell imaging RNAi screen identifies PP2A–B55α and importin-β1 as key mitotic exit regulators in human cells , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[30]  Louise P. Cramer,et al.  Forming the cell rear first: breaking cell symmetry to trigger directed cell migration , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[31]  Sylvia E. Le Dévédec,et al.  Systems microscopy approaches to understand cancer cell migration and metastasis , 2010, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[32]  Staffan Strömblad,et al.  Systems microscopy: an emerging strategy for the life sciences. , 2010, Experimental cell research.

[33]  R. Durbin,et al.  Phenotypic profiling of the human genome by time-lapse microscopy reveals cell division genes , 2010, Nature.

[34]  P. Friedl,et al.  The Journal of Cell Biology , 2002 .

[35]  Michael Sixt,et al.  Mechanical modes of 'amoeboid' cell migration. , 2009, Current opinion in cell biology.

[36]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Cancer attractors: a systems view of tumors from a gene network dynamics and developmental perspective. , 2009, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[37]  S. Itzkovitz,et al.  Multiparametric analysis of focal adhesion formation by RNAi-mediated gene knockdown , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[38]  R. Fässler,et al.  The Tail of Integrins, Talin, and Kindlins , 2009, Science.

[39]  Sui Huang.  Reprogramming cell fates: reconciling rarity with robustness , 2009, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[40]  E. Sahai,et al.  Rac Activation and Inactivation Control Plasticity of Tumor Cell Movement , 2008, Cell.

[41]  Greg M. Allen,et al.  Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells , 2008, Nature.

[42]  M. Sixt,et al.  Rapid leukocyte migration by integrin-independent flowing and squeezing , 2008, Nature.

[43]  Staffan Strömblad,et al.  Cell-matrix adhesion complexes: master control machinery of cell migration. , 2008, Seminars in cancer biology.

[44]  Erik Sahai,et al.  Smurf1 regulates tumor cell plasticity and motility through degradation of RhoA leading to localized inhibition of contractility , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[45]  T. Soldati,et al.  Dissection of amoeboid movement into two mechanically distinct modes , 2006, Journal of Cell Science.

[46]  C. Waterman-Storer,et al.  Spatiotemporal Feedback between Actomyosin and Focal-Adhesion Systems Optimizes Rapid Cell Migration , 2006, Cell.

[47]  J. Small,et al.  The comings and goings of actin: coupling protrusion and retraction in cell motility. , 2005, Current opinion in cell biology.

[48]  Erik Sahai,et al.  Mechanisms of cancer cell invasion. , 2005, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[49]  P. Friedl.  Prespecification and plasticity: shifting mechanisms of cell migration. , 2004, Current opinion in cell biology.

[50]  G. Borisy,et al.  Cell Migration: Integrating Signals from Front to Back , 2003, Science.

[51]  R. Liddington,et al.  Talin Binding to Integrin ß Tails: A Final Common Step in Integrin Activation , 2003, Science.

[52]  Anne J. Ridley,et al.  ROCKs: multifunctional kinases in cell behaviour , 2003, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[53]  J. J. Gibson,et al.  Rho kinase and matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors cooperate to inhibit angiogenesis and growth of human prostate cancer xenotransplants , 2003, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[54]  Peter Friedl,et al.  Compensation mechanism in tumor cell migration , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[55]  Richard O Hynes,et al.  Integrins Bidirectional, Allosteric Signaling Machines , 2002, Cell.

[56]  S. Huang,et al.  Shape-dependent control of cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis: switching between attractors in cell regulatory networks. , 2000, Experimental cell research.

[57]  R. Hynes,et al.  The Talin Head Domain Binds to Integrin β Subunit Cytoplasmic Tails and Regulates Integrin Activation* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[58]  S. Johansson,et al.  Separation of fibronectin from a plasma gelatinase using immobilized metal affinity chromatography , 1992, FEBS letters.

[59]  M. Hayashi,et al.  Novel purification of vitronectin from human plasma by heparin affinity chromatography. , 1988, Cell structure and function.

[60]  J. Verna,et al.  The relationship of fibroblast translocations to cell morphology and stress fibre density. , 1982, Journal of cell science.

[61]  R. D. Allen,et al.  Motility , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[62]  W. T. Chen.  Mechanism of retraction of the trailing edge during fibroblast movement , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[63]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. II. "RRuffling". , 1970, Experimental cell research.

[64]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. I. Movements of the leading edge. , 1970, Experimental cell research.

[65]  B. Geiger,et al.  Environmental sensing through focal adhesions , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[66]  A. Hall,et al.  Cell migration: Rho GTPases lead the way. , 2004, Developmental biology.

[67]  J. Heath,et al.  The shape and movement of fibroblasts in culture. , 1977, Society of General Physiologists series.