Methodological review of UK and international low carbon scenarios

Scenarios have a long history in business, politics and military planning, as a tool for strategic planning to inform protective, proactive or consensus-based decision making in the face of uncertain futures. Recent years have seen a growth in scenarios for assessing the implications of low carbon futures, but relatively little work has linked these energy scenarios to the broader literature on scenario development. This paper undertakes a methodological review of a selection of UK and international low carbon scenario studies, using a typology of 'trend based', 'technical feasibility' and 'modelling' studies. Dominant methodologies in such studies have been the 2x2 axis and the 'back-casting' approach. Strengths of the studies reviewed include technological detail, and identification of key economic and social constraints. Weaknesses include the over-reliance on constructs such as exogenous emissions constraints, and high level trends, which diminish the ability to understand how the various future scenarios could be brought about or avoided. This is compounded by the lack of depiction of specific system actors; the tendency to abstract policy from the scenarios; and the resulting failure to consider policy, technology and behaviour in an iterative, 'co-evolving' fashion.

[1]  I. M. Elders,et al.  Electricity Network Scenarios for Great Britain in 2050 , 2006 .

[2]  Neil Strachan,et al.  Scenarios and Sensitivities on Long-term UK Carbon Reductions using the UK MARKAL and MARKAL-Macro Energy System Models , 2008 .

[3]  W. McDowall,et al.  Forecasts, scenarios, visions, backcasts and roadmaps to the hydrogen economy: A review of the hydrogen futures literature , 2006 .

[4]  Peter A. Shulman,et al.  Analysis of US Energy Scenarios , 2003 .

[5]  H. Kahn,et al.  The Year 2000: A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty-Three Years, , 1967 .

[6]  F. Geels Technological Transitions And System Innovations: A Co-evolutionary And Socio-technical Analysis , 2005 .

[7]  Robert Lowe,et al.  An exploration of the technical feasibility of achieving CO2 emission reductions in excess of 60% within the UK housing stock by the year 2050 , 2005 .

[8]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Futures under glass , 1990 .

[9]  Steve Pye,et al.  The iterative contribution and relevance of modelling to UK energy policy , 2009 .

[10]  Li Yun,et al.  Energy and emission scenarios for China in the 21st century—exploration of baseline development and mitigation options , 2003 .

[11]  K. Valaskakis At the crossroads of “futurism” and “prospective”: Towards a Canadian synthesis? , 1988 .

[12]  Simon Shackley,et al.  Decarbonising the UK: Energy for a Climate Conscious Future , 2005 .

[13]  Mark Diesendorf,et al.  Clean energy scenarios for Australia , 2007 .

[14]  A. Chambers,et al.  World Energy Outlook 2008 , 2008 .

[15]  George Wright,et al.  The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning , 2005 .

[16]  Tom Sir Blundell,et al.  Energy: the changing climate , 2001 .

[17]  Neil Strachan,et al.  Review and Analysis of UK and International Low Carbon Energy Scenarios , 2009 .

[18]  Nick Hughes,et al.  A Historical Overview of Strategic Scenario Planning A Joint Working Paper of the UKERC and the EON.UK/EPSRC Transition Pathways Project , 2009 .

[19]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate Change 2007 Synthesis report , 2008 .