Theory Identity: A Machine-Learning Approach

Theory identity is a fundamental problem for researchers seeking to determine theory quality, create theory ontologies and taxonomies, or perform focused theory-specific reviews and meta-analyses. We demonstrate a novel machine-learning approach to theory identification based on citation data and article features. The multi-disciplinary ecosystem of articles which cite a theory's originating paper is created and refined into the network of papers predicted to contribute to, and thus identify, a specific theory. We provide a 'proof-of-concept' for a highly-cited theory. Implications for cross-disciplinary theory integration and the identification of theories for a rapidly expanding scientific literature are discussed.

[1]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[2]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Commentary: Revitalizing research on health behavior theories. , 2005, Health education research.

[3]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Is UTAUT really used or just cited for the sake of it? a systematic review of citations of UTAUT's originating article , 2011, ECIS.

[4]  Susan Michie,et al.  Behaviour change theories across Psychology, Sociology, Anthropology and Economics: A Systematic Review , 2011 .

[5]  P. Meehl.  Appraising and Amending Theories: The Strategy of Lakatosian Defense and Two Principles that Warrant It , 1990 .

[6]  Christopher C. Yang,et al.  Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium , 2012, IHI 2012.

[7]  Ron Weber,et al.  Evaluating and Developing Theories in the Information Systems Discipline , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Rich Caruana,et al.  An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms , 2006, ICML.

[9]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[10]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[11]  C. Abraham,et al.  Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach , 2005, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[12]  Jingjing Li,et al.  Establishing Nomological Networks for Behavioral Science: a Natural Language Processing Based Approach , 2011, ICIS.

[13]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[14]  P. Glasziou,et al.  Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence , 2009, The Lancet.

[15]  Kai R. T. Larsen,et al.  Addicted to constructs: science in reverse? , 2013, Addiction.

[16]  Dirk S. Hovorka,et al.  Developing Interfield Nomological Nets , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[17]  Kai R. T. Larsen,et al.  A Taxonomy of Antecedents of Information Systems Success: Variable Analysis Studies , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  H. Weiss,et al.  Affective Events Theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. , 1996 .

[19]  J A Swets,et al.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. , 1988, Science.

[20]  S. Michie,et al.  Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research , 2012, Implementation Science.

[21]  Mohammed Bennamoun,et al.  Ontology learning from text: A look back and into the future , 2012, CSUR.

[22]  K. Weick.  Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination , 1989 .

[23]  James Birt,et al.  A Meta-theoretic Approach to Theory Integration in Information Systems , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[24]  Enrico W. Coiera,et al.  Are decision trees a feasible knowledge representation to guide extraction of critical information from randomized controlled trial reports? , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[25]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Fashion Waves in Information Systems Research and Practice , 2009, MIS Q..

[26]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[27]  Enrico Coiera,et al.  The automation of systematic reviews , 2013, BMJ.

[28]  Carla E. Brodley,et al.  Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center: abstrackr , 2012, IHI '12.

[29]  E. Garfield.  The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. , 2006, JAMA.

[30]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  A Meta-Theory for Understanding Information Systems Within Sociotechnical Systems , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..