Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies

Sample sizes must be ascertained in qualitative studies like in quantitative studies but not by the same means. The prevailing concept for sample size in qualitative studies is “saturation.” Saturation is closely tied to a specific methodology, and the term is inconsistently applied. We propose the concept “information power” to guide adequate sample size for qualitative studies. Information power indicates that the more information the sample holds, relevant for the actual study, the lower amount of participants is needed. We suggest that the size of a sample with sufficient information power depends on (a) the aim of the study, (b) sample specificity, (c) use of established theory, (d) quality of dialogue, and (e) analysis strategy. We present a model where these elements of information and their relevant dimensions are related to information power. Application of this model in the planning and during data collection of a qualitative study is discussed.

[1]  ชวิตรา ตันติมาลา Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis , 2017 .

[2]  J. Morse All Data Are Not Equal , 2015, Qualitative health research.

[3]  J. Morse “Data Were Saturated . . . ” , 2015, Qualitative health research.

[4]  M. O’Reilly,et al.  ‘Unsatisfactory Saturation’: a critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research , 2013 .

[5]  K. Malterud Systematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis , 2012, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[6]  C. Glenton,et al.  What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[7]  M. Mason Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews , 2010 .

[8]  Peter Bacchetti,et al.  Current sample size conventions: Flaws, harms, and alternatives , 2010, BMC medicine.

[9]  P. Draper Reflexive methodology - new vistas for qualitative research: Media Reviews , 2008 .

[10]  D. Cohen,et al.  Evaluative Criteria for Qualitative Research in Health Care: Controversies and Recommendations , 2008, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[11]  Laura Johnson,et al.  How Many Interviews Are Enough? , 2006 .

[12]  K. Malterud Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines , 2001, The Lancet.

[13]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research , 2000, QMiP Bulletin.

[14]  K Chamberlain,et al.  Methodolatry and Qualitative Health Research , 2000, Journal of health psychology.

[15]  J. Morse Determining Sample Size , 2000 .

[16]  Lois W. Sayrs Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[17]  M. Sandelowski One is the liveliest number: the case orientation of qualitative research. , 1996, Research in nursing & health.

[18]  M. Marshall Sampling for qualitative research. , 1996, Family practice.

[19]  J. Morse The Significance of Saturation , 1995 .

[20]  M. Sandelowski Sample size in qualitative research. , 1995, Research in nursing & health.

[21]  Anton J. Kuzel,et al.  Sampling in qualitative inquiry. , 1992 .

[22]  Janice M. Morse,et al.  Strategies for Sampling , 1991 .

[23]  I R McWhinney,et al.  'An acquaintance with particulars...'. , 1989, Family medicine.

[24]  Donna Harawy Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective , 2022, Philosophical Literary Journal Logos.

[25]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[26]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .