Herbivore and predator diversity interactively affect ecosystem properties in an experimental marine community.

Interacting changes in predator and prey diversity likely influence ecosystem properties but have rarely been experimentally tested. We manipulated the species richness of herbivores and predators in an experimental benthic marine community and measured their effects on predator, herbivore and primary producer performance. Predator composition and richness strongly affected several community and population responses, mostly via sampling effects. However, some predators survived better in polycultures than in monocultures, suggesting complementarity due to stronger intra- than interspecific interactions. Predator effects also differed between additive and substitutive designs, emphasizing that the relationship between diversity and abundance in an assemblage can strongly influence whether and how diversity effects are realized. Changing herbivore richness and predator richness interacted to influence both total herbivore abundance and predatory crab growth, but these interactive diversity effects were weak. Overall, the presence and richness of predators dominated biotic effects on community and ecosystem properties.

[1]  J. Bruno,et al.  Cascading effects of predator richness , 2008 .

[2]  J. Bruno,et al.  Understanding the Effects of Marine Biodiversity on Communities and Ecosystems , 2007 .

[3]  J. Bruno,et al.  Predatory fish loss affects the structure and functioning of a model marine food web , 2007 .

[4]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Predator diversity and trophic interactions. , 2007, Ecology.

[5]  Michel Loreau,et al.  The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[6]  A. Ives,et al.  Effects of species diversity on community biomass production change over the course of succession. , 2007, Ecology.

[7]  E. Barbier,et al.  Impacts of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services , 2006, Science.

[8]  Bradley J. Cardinale,et al.  Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems , 2006, Nature.

[9]  P. Balvanera,et al.  Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[10]  Gretchen B. Snyder,et al.  Predator biodiversity strengthens herbivore suppression. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[11]  J. Emmett Duffy,et al.  Diversity and dispersal interactively affect predictability of ecosystem function , 2006, Nature.

[12]  A. Ives,et al.  Biodiversity as both a cause and consequence of resource availability: a study of reciprocal causality in a predator-prey system. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[13]  W. E. Snyder,et al.  Species identity dominates the relationship between predator biodiversity and herbivore suppression. , 2006, Ecology.

[14]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Functional Diversity of Plant–Pollinator Interaction Webs Enhances the Persistence of Plant Communities , 2005, PLoS biology.

[15]  Jarrett E. K. Byrnes,et al.  Predator diversity strengthens trophic cascades in kelp forests by modifying herbivore behaviour. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[16]  J. Bruno,et al.  Effects of macroalgal species identity and richness on primary production in benthic marine communities. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[17]  Mary I. O'Connor,et al.  Cascading effects of predator diversity and omnivory in a marine food web , 2005 .

[18]  H. Hillebrand,et al.  Species richness changes across two trophic levels simultaneously affect prey and consumer biomass , 2005 .

[19]  Jae S. Choi,et al.  Trophic Cascades in a Formerly Cod-Dominated Ecosystem , 2005, Science.

[20]  J. Duffy,et al.  Ecosystem consequences of diversity depend on food chain length in estuarine vegetation , 2005 .

[21]  S. D. Cooper,et al.  WHAT DETERMINES THE STRENGTH OF A TROPHIC CASCADE , 2005 .

[22]  F. Chapin,et al.  EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[23]  A. Ives,et al.  A synthesis of subdisciplines: predator–prey interactions, and biodiversity and ecosystem functioning , 2004 .

[24]  Shinichi Nakagawa.  A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias , 2004, Behavioral Ecology.

[25]  R. Denno,et al.  Predator diversity dampens trophic cascades , 2004, Nature.

[26]  Aaron M. Ellison,et al.  A Primer of Ecological Statistics , 2004 .

[27]  Helmut Hillebrand,et al.  Consumer effects decline with prey diversity , 2004 .

[28]  J. Fox.  EFFECTS OF ALGAL AND HERBIVORE DIVERSITY ON THE PARTITIONING OF BIOMASS WITHIN AND AMONG TROPHIC LEVELS , 2004 .

[29]  B. Worm,et al.  Biodiversity, productivity and stability in real food webs , 2003 .

[30]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Food-web constraints on biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience , 2003 .

[32]  Elizabeth A. Canuel,et al.  Grazer diversity effects on ecosystem functioning in seagrass beds , 2003 .

[33]  S. Peacor,et al.  A REVIEW OF TRAIT-MEDIATED INDIRECT INTERACTIONS IN ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES , 2003 .

[34]  M. Moran.  Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies , 2003 .

[35]  Elizabeth T. Borer,et al.  A cross-ecosystem comparison of the strength of trophic cascades , 2002 .

[36]  J. Duffy,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the consumer connection , 2002 .

[37]  Deborah Hart.  Intraguild predation, invertebrate predators, and trophic cascades in lake food webs. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[38]  M. Loreau,et al.  Overyielding in grassland communities: testing the sampling effect hypothesis with replicated biodiversity experiments , 2002 .

[39]  O. Dangles,et al.  Simulating species loss following perturbation: assessing the effects on process rates , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Linearity in the aggregate effects of multiple predators in a food web , 2002 .

[41]  J. Duffy,et al.  Species-specific impacts of grazing amphipods in an eelgrass-bed community , 2001 .

[42]  R M Nisbet,et al.  Habitat structure and population persistence in an experimental community , 2001, Nature.

[43]  D. Srivastava,et al.  Numerical and per capita responses to species loss: mechanisms maintaining ecosystem function in a community of stream insect detritivores , 2001 .

[44]  J. Valentine,et al.  Effects of nutrient enrichment and small predator density on seagrass ecosystems: An experimental assessment , 2000 .

[45]  P. Jolliffe.  The replacement series , 2000 .

[46]  J. Emmett Duffy,et al.  STRONG IMPACTS OF GRAZING AMPHIPODS ON THE ORGANIZATION OF A BENTHIC COMMUNITY , 2000 .

[47]  Shahid Naeem,et al.  Producer–decomposer co-dependency influences biodiversity effects , 2000, Nature.

[48]  J. Stachowicz,et al.  Reduced mobility is associated with compensatory feeding and increased diet breadth of marine crabs , 1999 .

[49]  G. Polis,et al.  Why Are Parts of the World Green? Multiple Factors Control Productivity and the Distribution of Biomass , 1999 .

[50]  W. R. Demott.  UTILIZATION OF A CYANOBACTERIUM AND A PHOSPHORUS-DEFICIENT GREEN ALGA AS COMPLEMENTARY RESOURCES BY DAPHNIDS , 1998 .

[51]  A Sih,et al.  Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[52]  R. Denno,et al.  POSITIVE PREDATOR–PREDATOR INTERACTIONS: ENHANCED PREDATION RATES AND SYNERGISTIC SUPPRESSION OF APHID POPULATIONS , 1998 .

[53]  G. Polis,et al.  Food Web Complexity and Community Dynamics , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[54]  G. Edgar,et al.  The production and trophic ecology of shallow-water fish assemblages in southern Australia III. General relationships between sediments, seagrasses, invertebrates and fishes , 1995 .

[55]  M. Peck,et al.  Gut contents of common mummichogs, Fundulus heteroclitus L., in a restored impounded marsh and in natural reference marshes , 1994 .

[56]  Donald R. Strong,et al.  ARE TROPHIC CASCADES ALL WET? DIFFERENTIATION AND DONOR-CONTROL IN SPECIOSE ECOSYSTEMS' , 1992 .

[57]  B. Walker.  Biodiversity and Ecological Redundancy , 1992 .

[58]  J. Emmett Duffy.  Amphipods on seaweeds: partners or pests? , 1990, Oecologia.

[59]  W. Rice.  ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[60]  W. Nelson.  Experimental studies of selective predation on ampibpods: Consequences for amphipod distribution and abundance , 1979 .

[61]  F. Johansson,et al.  Intermediate predator impact on consumers weakens with increasing predator diversity in the presence of a top-predator , 2007 .

[62]  J. Fox.  Modelling the joint effects of predator and prey diversity on total prey biomass , 2004 .

[63]  B. Worm,et al.  META-ANALYSIS OF COD-SHRIMP INTERACTIONS REVEALS TOP-DOWN CONTROL IN OCEANIC FOOD WEBS , 2003 .

[64]  Susan L. Williams.  Seagrass community ecology , 2001 .

[65]  S. L. Lima.  Nonlethal Effects in the Ecology of Predator-Prey Interactions What are the ecological effects of anti-predator decision-making? , 1998 .

[66]  T. Fredette,et al.  Life history of Gammarus mucronatus Say (Amphipoda: Gammaridae) in warm temperate estuarine habitats, York River, Virginia , 1986 .

[67]  W. Nelson.  Experimental Studies of Decapod and Fish Predation on Seagrass Macrobenthos , 1981 .