Distinct Neural Specializations for Learning to Read Words and Name Objects

Understanding the neural systems that underpin reading acquisition is key if neuroscientific findings are to inform educational practice. We provide a unique window into these systems by teaching 19 adults to read 24 novel words written in unfamiliar letters and to name 24 novel objects while in an MRI scanner. Behavioral performance on trained items was equivalent for the two stimulus types. However, componential letter-sound associations were extracted when learning to read, as shown by correct reading of untrained words, whereas object–name associations were holistic and arbitrary. Activity in bilateral anterior fusiform gyri was greater during object name learning than learning to read, and ROI analyses indicated that left mid-fusiform activity was predictive of success in object name learning but not in learning to read. In contrast, activity in bilateral parietal cortices was predictive of success for both stimulus types but was greater during learning and recall of written word pronunciations relative to object names. We argue that mid-to-anterior fusiform gyri preferentially process whole items and contribute to learning their spoken form associations, processes that are required for skilled reading. In contrast, parietal cortices preferentially process componential visual–verbal mappings, a process that is crucial for early reading development.

[1]  J. Gottlieb From Thought to Action: The Parietal Cortex as a Bridge between Perception, Action, and Cognition , 2007, Neuron.

[2]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST HOW PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE INFORMS THE TEACHING OF READING , 2022 .

[3]  B. Miller,et al.  The neural basis of surface dyslexia in semantic dementia. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dissociating Reading Processes on the Basis of Neuronal Interactions , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Martin Kronbichler,et al.  A dual-route perspective on brain activation in response to visual words: Evidence for a length by lexicality interaction in the visual word form area (VWFA) , 2010, NeuroImage.

[6]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Interpreting response time effects in functional imaging studies , 2014, NeuroImage.

[7]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Visual word processing and experiential origins of functional selectivity in human extrastriate cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Régine Kolinsky,et al.  Illiterate to literate: behavioural and cerebral changes induced by reading acquisition , 2015, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al.  Specialization for written words over objects in the visual cortex , 2011, NeuroImage.

[10]  C. Price,et al.  The Interactive Account of ventral occipitotemporal contributions to reading , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Melvyn A Goodale,et al.  Two visual streams: Interconnections do not imply duplication of function , 2010, Cognitive neuroscience.

[12]  Asaid Khateb,et al.  Variability of fMRI activation during a phonological and semantic language task in healthy subjects , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Unified segmentation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[14]  S Lehéricy,et al.  The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Brian A. Wandell,et al.  The Development of Cortical Sensitivity to Visual Word Forms , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  M. Goodale,et al.  Two visual systems re-viewed , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  Leo Blomert,et al.  The neural signature of orthographic–phonological binding in successful and failing reading development , 2011, NeuroImage.

[18]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonstationary cluster-size inference with random field and permutation methods , 2004, NeuroImage.

[19]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Parietal cortex and attention , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[20]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  Laurie S. Glezer,et al.  Evidence for Highly Selective Neuronal Tuning to Whole Words in the “Visual Word Form Area” , 2009, Neuron.

[22]  R. Bowtell,et al.  “sparse” temporal sampling in auditory fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[23]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Rapid processing of letters, digits and symbols: what purely visual-attentional deficit in developmental dyslexia? , 2009, Developmental science.

[24]  J. Démonet,et al.  Role of the superior parietal lobules in letter-identity processing within strings: FMRI evidence from skilled and dyslexicreaders , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  Joseph T. Devlin,et al.  Early and Sustained Supramarginal Gyrus Contributions to Phonological Processing , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[26]  Brenda Rapp,et al.  The orthography-specific functions of the left fusiform gyrus: Evidence of modality and category specificity , 2010, Cortex.

[27]  W. K. Simmons,et al.  Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  M. Sigman,et al.  The neural code for written words: a proposal , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  M. Seghier,et al.  An anatomical signature for literacy , 2009, Nature.

[31]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cultural Recycling of Cortical Maps , 2007, Neuron.

[32]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The unique role of the visual word form area in reading , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  P. Matthews,et al.  Semantic Processing in the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.

[35]  Mingxia Zhang,et al.  The “visual word form area” is involved in successful memory encoding of both words and faces , 2010, NeuroImage.

[36]  Michael S. Beauchamp,et al.  Statistical criteria in fMRI studies of multisensory integration , 2005, Neuroinformatics.

[37]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Visual word recognition in the left and right hemispheres: anatomical and functional correlates of peripheral alexias. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  W. Schneider,et al.  Cross‐cultural effect on the brain revisited: Universal structures plus writing system variation , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[39]  Tali Bitan,et al.  Neural correlates of mapping from phonology to orthography in children performing an auditory spelling task. , 2007, Developmental science.

[40]  Mariano Sigman,et al.  Hierarchical Coding of Letter Strings in the Ventral Stream: Dissecting the Inner Organization of the Visual Word-Form System , 2007, Neuron.

[41]  S E Shaywitz,et al.  Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability. , 2001, Journal of communication disorders.

[42]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Can cognitive models explain brain activation during word and pseudoword reading? A meta-analysis of 36 neuroimaging studies. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[43]  G. Eden,et al.  Development of Ventral Stream Representations for Single Letters , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Thomas Wolbers,et al.  Hippocampus activity differentiates good from poor learners of a novel lexicon , 2005, NeuroImage.

[45]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[46]  A. Mechelli,et al.  Neuroimaging Studies of Word and Pseudoword Reading: Consistencies, Inconsistencies, and Limitations , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[48]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[49]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. , 2007, Psychological review.

[50]  R. Weisskoff,et al.  Improved auditory cortex imaging using clustered volume acquisitions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[51]  A. Mechelli,et al.  Anatomical Traces of Vocabulary Acquisition in the Adolescent Brain , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  S. Valdois,et al.  Developmental dyslexia: The visual attention span deficit hypothesis , 2007, Cognition.

[53]  Jay G. Rueckl,et al.  A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of the tradeoff between semantics and phonology in reading aloud , 2005, Neuroreport.

[54]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Multimodal Image Coregistration and Partitioning—A Unified Framework , 1997, NeuroImage.

[55]  Joel R. Meyer,et al.  Relation between brain activation and lexical performance , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[56]  David C. Plaut,et al.  A connectionist approach to word reading and acquired dyslexia: extension to sequential processing , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[57]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud , 1999 .

[58]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[59]  Ferath Kherif,et al.  Automatic Top-Down Processing Explains Common Left Occipito-Temporal Responses to Visual Words and Objects , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[60]  O Josephs,et al.  Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging: modelling, inference and optimization. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[61]  Martin Kronbichler,et al.  Taxi vs. Taksi: On Orthographic Word Recognition in the Left Ventral Occipitotemporal Cortex , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[62]  S. Valdois,et al.  The visual attention span deficit in dyslexia is visual and not verbal , 2012, Cortex.

[63]  Gui Xue,et al.  Language experience shapes fusiform activation when processing a logographic artificial language: An fMRI training study , 2006, NeuroImage.

[64]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Learning new names for new objects: Cortical effects as measured by magnetoencephalography , 2004, Brain and Language.

[65]  Mark H. Ellisman,et al.  Statistical Criteria in fMRI Studies of Multisensory Integration Comparison of Vector Space Model Methodologies to Reconcile Cross-Species Neuroanatomical Concepts Development of a Model for Microphysiological Simulations , 2005 .

[66]  Kuniyoshi L Sakai,et al.  Learning letters in adulthood: direct visualization of cortical plasticity for forming a new link between orthography and phonology. , 2004, Neuron.

[67]  Fabio Richlan,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of developmental dyslexia: the role of orthographic depth , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[68]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[69]  Alexander P. Leff,et al.  Too Little, Too Late: Reduced Visual Span and Speed Characterize Pure Alexia , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[70]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Improving Lesion-Symptom Mapping , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[71]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Topographical Layout of Hand, Eye, Calculation, and Language-Related Areas in the Human Parietal Lobe , 2002, Neuron.

[72]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Reading normal and degraded words: Contribution of the dorsal and ventral visual pathways , 2008, NeuroImage.

[73]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Orthographic transparency modulates the functional asymmetry in the fusiform cortex: An artificial language training study , 2013, Brain and Language.

[74]  Angela R Laird,et al.  Meta‐analyses of object naming: Effect of baseline , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[75]  D. Hassabis,et al.  Tracking the Emergence of Conceptual Knowledge during Human Decision Making , 2009, Neuron.

[76]  Joseph T Devlin,et al.  The myth of the visual word form area , 2003, NeuroImage.

[77]  D. Funder Global Traits: A Neo-Allportian Approach to Personality , 1991 .

[78]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe , 2004, NeuroImage.

[79]  Parashkev Nachev,et al.  Space and the parietal cortex , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[80]  Urs Maurer,et al.  Attentional Focus During Learning Impacts N170 ERP Responses to an Artificial Script , 2010, Developmental neuropsychology.

[81]  Colin Humphries,et al.  The role of left occipitotemporal cortex in reading: reconciling stimulus, task, and lexicality effects. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.