Oral corrective feedback in the foreign language classroom: how it affects interaction in analytic foreign language teaching

Abstract The discussion on the role of corrective feedback is part of a larger discussion on the role of ‘focusing on form’ in foreign language teaching (Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998). Studies conducted in communicative and content-based foreign language teaching (FLT) settings have shown that some focus on form seems to be required for learners to ‘notice the gap’ (in: R. Day (Ed.), Talking to Learn, Newbury House, Rowley, MA, pp. 237–326) between their erroneous utterances and the target language.This article discusses the role of different types of oral corrective feedback in analytic FLT. Stern (in: B. Harley, P. Allen, J. Cummins, M. Swain (Eds.), The Development of Second Language Proficiency, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 93–109; Issues and options in language teaching, Oxford University Press, Oxford) refers to FLT as analytic when the focus of instruction is on the form of the foreign language as opposed to more content-based approaches where the focus is on meaning and content. Typical for analytic FLT are discrete point presentation along with feedback on formal error. This type of FLT is still common practice in Belgian secondary schools.The study explores the role of different kinds of corrective feedback in an analytic setting (German as a foreign language in Flanders, Belgium). The frequency and distribution of several corrective feedback types together with the frequency and distribution of different types of learner uptake following each feedback type (see Stud. Second Language Acquisit. 19 (1997) 37) are discussed. The question then is which strategy is to be preferred in terms of noticing the feedback.

[1]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Input in second language acquisition , 1985 .

[2]  Michael H. Long.  Does Second Language Instruction Make a Difference? A Review of Research , 1983 .

[3]  Michael H. Long.  Focus on Form , 1991 .

[4]  R. Lyster,et al.  CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNER UPTAKE , 1997, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[5]  Patrick Allen,et al.  The Development of Second Language Proficiency , 1990 .

[6]  Michael H. Long,et al.  The Role of Implicit Negative Feedback in SLA: Models and Recasts in Japanese and Spanish , 1998 .

[7]  E. Horwitz,et al.  语言教学的问题与可选策略 = Issues and options in language teaching , 1993 .

[8]  R. Schmidt.  Attention and awareness in foreign language learning , 1995 .

[9]  Rod Ellis,et al.  The Study of Second Language Acquisition , 1994 .

[10]  Leo Van Lier,et al.  The classroom and the language learner : ethnography and second Language classroom research , 1989 .

[11]  D. Allwright.  Focus on the language classroom , 1991 .

[12]  Best Paper by a Graduate Student Award , 1990 .

[13]  M. Saxton.  The Contrast Theory of negative input , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[14]  Alison Mackey,et al.  Conversational Interaction and Second Language Development: Recasts, Responses, and Red Herrings? , 1998 .

[15]  Patsy M. Lightbown.  Input filters in second language acquisition , 2001 .

[16]  M. J. Farrar,et al.  Negative Evidence and Grammatical Morpheme Acquisition. , 1992 .

[17]  Catherine Doughty,et al.  Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series. , 1998 .

[18]  Roy Lyster,et al.  Negotiation in Immersion Teacher-Student Interaction. , 2002 .

[19]  Michael H. Long.  The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition , 1996 .

[20]  P. Gordon.  Learnability and Feedback , 1990 .

[21]  Alec McHoul,et al.  The organization of repair in classroom talk , 1990, Language in Society.

[22]  M. Swain.  Communicative competence : Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development , 1985 .

[23]  R. Lyster.  RECASTS, REPETITION, AND AMBIGUITY IN L2 CLASSROOM DISCOURSE , 1998, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[24]  T. Pica,et al.  Comprehensible Output as an Outcome of Linguistic Demands on the Learner , 1989, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[25]  Willis J. Edmondson,et al.  Einführung in die Sprachlehrforschung , 1994 .

[26]  H. H. Stern,et al.  The Development of Second Language Proficiency: Analysis and experience as variables in second language pedagogy , 1990 .