Review of transmission schemes and case studies for renewable power integration into the remote grid

Investment in transmission for renewable power penetration to the remote grid essentially faces a set of inherent, regulatory, economic and technical challenges. This work investigates these challenges to enhance renewable power integration into the remote grid. This study aims to enhance regulatory policies and associated planning frameworks to be more efficient and justifiable for renewable power integration paradigm. First, a set of leading transmission schemes practiced, or investigated, in different countries are evaluated against the challenges which are obvious for long distance renewable power transmission. Second, a net benefit framework is presented to address the challenging issues of location constrained renewable power penetration into the Queensland network of the Australian grid. The proposed framework incorporates the carbon emission price as an environmental benefit which significantly influences the cost–benefit analysis. This paper discusses the ‘hub approach’ of network integration. The transmission investment cost allocation is addressed here as well. The concepts are verified through the implementation of the proposed framework in four prospective projects of the Queensland network in the Australian national electricity market (NEM).

[1]  M. Ehsan,et al.  Possibilistic Evaluation of Distributed Generations Impacts on Distribution Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Mehdi Ehsan,et al.  A possibilistic-probabilistic tool for evaluating the impact of stochastic renewable and controllable power generation on energy losses in distribution networks - A case study , 2011 .

[3]  Dccee Clean Energy Bill 2011 , 2011 .

[4]  Hans Auer,et al.  Conditions and costs for renewables electricity grid connection: Examples in Europe , 2008 .

[5]  J. Contreras,et al.  Transmission Expansion Planning in Electricity Markets , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  R.J. Green,et al.  Transmission Use of System Charges Under Future GB Power System Scenarios , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  D. Chattopadhyay,et al.  Scale Efficient Network Development to Support Renewable Generation Development , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[8]  D. Osborn,et al.  The view from the top , 2009, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[10]  Tapan Kumar Saha,et al.  Investigating the priority of market participants for low emission generation entry into the Australian grid , 2014 .

[11]  A. Soroudi,et al.  Possibilistic-Scenario Model for DG Impact Assessment on Distribution Networks in an Uncertain Environment , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Jiachun Guo,et al.  Wisdom about age [aging electricity infrastructure] , 2006, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[13]  Tapan Kumar Saha,et al.  Modelling uncertainty in renewable generation entry to deregulated electricity market , 2011, AUPEC 2011.

[14]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Making Room for the Boom , 2010, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[15]  T. K. Saha,et al.  Emission pricing and locational signal impact on generation portfolio in large scale Queensland network , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[16]  Tapan Kumar Saha,et al.  Renewable power penetration to remote grid - transmission configuration and net benefit analyses , 2011, 2011 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies.

[17]  L.A. Barroso,et al.  Planning for Big Things in Brazil , 2007, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[18]  M. Shahidehpour Investing in expansion: the many issues that cloud transmission planning , 2004 .

[19]  T. S. Kishore,et al.  Optimal economic planning of power transmission lines: A review , 2014 .

[20]  A.J. Conejo,et al.  Planning to expand? , 2007, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.