Wetting transitions of cellular aggregates induced by substrate rigidity

The inhibition of tissue spreading is of great interest for medical applications, including the prevention of tumor mass dispersal to avoid cancer propagation. While chemical approaches have previously been reported to control tissue spreading, here we investigate a physical mechanism to inhibit spreading. We study the effect of substrate rigidity on the statics and dynamics of spreading of spheroidal aggregates of cells deposited on fibronectin-coated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and polyacrylamide (PAA) substrates by tuning the elastic modulus E from 0.2 kPa to 1.8 MPa while maintaining a constant chemical environment. On rigid substrates, above a threshold elastic modulus Ec ≈ 8 kPa, the aggregate spreads with a cellular monolayer expanding around the aggregate (“complete wetting”). The kinetics of spreading obeys a diffusive law with a diffusion coefficient D(E) presenting a maximum that we interpret theoretically. At E = Ec, we observe a wetting transition, and on soft substrates (E < Ec), the aggregate no longer spreads. Instead, it flattens and adopts an equilibrium shape of a spherical cap with a finite contact angle (“partial wetting”). These results provide insight into the relevant physical principles underlying cellular aggregate spreading, a phenomenon of interest in the understanding of tumor spreading and invasion.

[1]  J. Ohayon,et al.  The motility of normal and cancer cells in response to the combined influence of the substrate rigidity and anisotropic microstructure. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[2]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Synergistic roles for receptor occupancy and aggregation in integrin transmembrane function , 1995, Science.

[3]  Françoise Brochard-Wyart,et al.  Spreading dynamics and wetting transition of cellular aggregates , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[5]  A. Besser,et al.  Dynamics of cellular focal adhesions on deformable substrates: consequences for cell force microscopy. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[6]  Sean P. Palecek,et al.  Integrin-ligand binding properties govern cell migration speed through cell-substratum adhesiveness , 1997, Nature.

[7]  Dennis E Discher,et al.  How deeply cells feel: methods for thin gels , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[8]  K. Beningo,et al.  Fc-receptor-mediated phagocytosis is regulated by mechanical properties of the target. , 2002, Journal of cell science.

[9]  Z. Werb,et al.  Suppression of ICE and apoptosis in mammary epithelial cells by extracellular matrix , 1995, Science.

[10]  Joe Tien,et al.  Repositioning of cells by mechanotaxis on surfaces with micropatterned Young's modulus. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[11]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[12]  Jennifer L. West,et al.  Synthetic Materials in the Study of Cell Response to Substrate Rigidity , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Soft matters in cell adhesion: rigidity sensing on soft elastic substrates. , 2007, Soft matter.

[14]  M. S. Steinberg,et al.  ON THE MECHANISM OF TISSUE RECONSTRUCTION BY DISSOCIATED CELLS, III. FREE ENERGY RELATIONS AND THE REORGANIZATION OF FUSED, HETERONOMIC TISSUE FRAGMENTS. , 1962, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  J. Di Meglio,et al.  Traction forces exerted by epithelial cell sheets , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[16]  Dennis E Discher,et al.  Striated acto-myosin fibers can reorganize and register in response to elastic interactions with the matrix. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[17]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton , 1993 .

[18]  A. Asnacios,et al.  Acto-myosin based response to stiffness and rigidity sensing , 2011, Cell adhesion & migration.

[19]  Malcolm S. Steinberg,et al.  Reconstruction of Tissues by Dissociated Cells , 1963 .

[20]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[21]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Mechanisms of epibolic tissue spreading analyzed in a model morphogenetic system. Roles for cell migration and tissue contractility. , 1992, Journal of cell science.

[22]  Daniel Connors,et al.  Fibronectin Matrix Assembly Suppresses Dispersal of Glioblastoma Cells , 2011, PloS one.

[23]  F. Brochard-Wyart,et al.  Active diffusion-limited aggregation of cells , 2012 .

[24]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Taking Cell-Matrix Adhesions to the Third Dimension , 2001, Science.

[25]  Dennis Discher,et al.  Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[26]  J. Kohn,et al.  Tissue spreading on implantable substrates is a competitive outcome of cell–cell vs. cell–substratum adhesivity , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  G. I. Bell Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.

[28]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  J. Trinkaus,et al.  DIFFERENTIATION IN CULTURE OF MIXED AGGREGATES OF DISSOCIATED TISSUE CELLS. , 1955, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Pascal Silberzan,et al.  Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces? , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[31]  R. Nerem,et al.  Shear stress modulates endothelial cell morphology and F‐actin organization through the regulation of focal adhesion‐associated proteins , 1995, Journal of cellular physiology.

[32]  Y. Wang,et al.  Preparation of a flexible, porous polyacrylamide substrate for mechanical studies of cultured cells. , 1998, Methods in enzymology.