Scanning electron microscopical analysis of laser-treated titanium implant surfaces--a comparative study.

Design and surface qualities of titanium implants are of vital importance for long-term stability following implantation. Four different implant surfaces treated individually were analyzed with special attention focused on laser surface treatment. Surfaces with machine roughness, titanium spray coating, treated by aluminum oxide and treated by laser were examined individually. Evaluation of the surface was carried out by electron microscope examination and mechanical profilometry. The EDS analysis determined the degree of contamination of the implant surface. Electron microscope examination showed that the titanium plasma spray as well as the laser-treated implants have optimum surface qualities: a secondary and tertiary structure with micro-roughness of 10 mm and roughness ranging from 0.5 to 4 mm. The least contamination was found for machine rough surfaces as well as those treated by laser. The other implants showed contamination corresponding to the method of surface treatment. In summary the optimal surface structure with the least contamination was found for the laser-treated titanium surface. Similar surface purity was found for the machine rough surfaces. An optimal structure was also achieved by the titanium plasma spray method, however, at the cost of surface purity.

[1]  D. Dean,et al.  Prostaglandins mediate the effects of titanium surface roughness on MG63 osteoblast-like cells and alter cell responsiveness to 1 alpha,25-(OH)2D3. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[2]  R. Nishimura,et al.  Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbit. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[3]  G. C. Allen,et al.  Surface analysis of titanium implants. , 1993, Biomaterials.

[4]  A. Scarano,et al.  Bone reactions to early occlusal loading of two-stage titanium plasma-sprayed implants: a pilot study in monkeys. , 1997, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[5]  T. Young,et al.  Ultrastructural analyses of the attachment (bonding) zone between bone and implanted biomaterials. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[6]  T Albrektsson,et al.  A quantitative comparison of machined commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium implants in rabbit bone. , 1998, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[7]  C. Bünger,et al.  Porous-coated versus grit-blasted surface texture of hydroxyapatite-coated implants during controlled micromotion: mechanical and histomorphometric results. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  R. Nishimura,et al.  COUNTERTORQUE TESTING AND HISTOMORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF VARIOUS IMPLANT SURFACES IN CANINES: A PILOT STUDY , 1997, Implant dentistry.

[9]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[10]  T Albrektsson,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative investigations of surface enlarged titanium and titanium alloy implants. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  A. Wennerberg,et al.  A histomorphometric evaluation of screw-shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughnesses. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.

[12]  B Rangert,et al.  Influence of implant diameters on the integration of screw implants. An experimental study in rabbits. , 1997, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[13]  D R Sumner,et al.  Use of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 on Ectopic Porous Coated Implants in the Rat , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  C. Colwell,et al.  Bone response to implant surface morphology. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[15]  H. Herø,et al.  Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants: light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy investigations. , 1998, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[16]  J. Davies,et al.  Mechanisms of endosseous integration. , 1998, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[17]  T. Beck,et al.  A study of different calcification areas in newly formed bone 8 weeks after insertion of dental implants in rabbit tibias. , 1998, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.