Expressive participation in Internet social movements: Testing the moderating effect of technology readiness and sex on student SNS use

An understanding of students' use of social networking sites (SNS) for expressive participation in Internet Social Movements (ISMs) is absent in the literature on the social psychology of student social networking behavior. Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) as a theoretical framework and survey data collected from 214 students in Spain, we empirically test the UTAUT theory in this context. Our results confirm that effort expectancy, social influence, and performance expectancy significantly affect students' intentions to use SNS for expressive participation in Internet social movements. We also test the moderating effect of students' sex and Technology Readiness (TR) on these UTAUT relationships. Our results show that the intention to use SNS is strongly influenced by effort expectancy for female students and students with self-reported low-levels of technology readiness. For male students and students with self-reportinghigh-levels of technology readiness, the relationship is strongly influenced by social influence. The implications of our findings for theory and practice are discussed.

[1]  George R. Milne,et al.  Gender Differences in Privacy-Related Measures for Young Adult Facebook Users , 2010 .

[2]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[3]  Nikos Tsikriktsis.  A Technology Readiness-Based Taxonomy of Customers , 2004 .

[4]  Lynn Owens,et al.  Making the News: Anarchist Counter-Public Relations on the World Wide Web , 2003 .

[5]  Dianne Cyr,et al.  The role of social presence in establishing loyalty in e-Service environments , 2007, Interact. Comput..

[6]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Age differences in online social networking - A study of user profiles and the social capital divide among teenagers and older users in MySpace , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[8]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  COMMUNICATION THEORY Communication Theory ISSN 1050-3293 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Campaigns, Reflection, and Deliberation: Advancing an O-S-R-O-R Model of Communication Effects , 2022 .

[9]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[10]  M. Castells.  Communication Power: Mass Communication, Mass Self-Communication and Power Relationships in the Network Society , 2009, Media and Society.

[11]  P. J. Sher,et al.  Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: The TRAM model , 2007 .

[12]  Kelly L. Page,et al.  Perceptions of web knowledge and usability: When sex and experience matter , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[14]  Soran Shangapour,et al.  Cyber social-networks and social movements Case study: Tehran (2009-10) , 2010 .

[15]  P. K. Kannan,et al.  Employee Technology Readiness and Adoption of Wireless Technology and Services , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[16]  S. Clegg,et al.  Gender and Computing: Not the same old problem , 2000 .

[17]  Venkatesh,et al.  A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision-Making Processes. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[18]  Kwan Min Lee.  Effects of Internet Use on College Students' Political Efficacy , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[19]  A. Bornstein,et al.  Battle of Seattle , 2014 .

[20]  Kevin Celuch,et al.  Technology Readiness in the E-Insurance Industry: An Exploratory Investigation and Development of an Agent Technology E-Consumption Model , 2002 .

[21]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Emerging and scripted roles in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  P. Howard,et al.  The Upheavals in Egypt and Tunisia: The Role of Digital Media , 2011 .

[23]  J. P. Eveland.  The Effect of Political Discussion in Producing Informed Citizens: The Roles of Information, Motivation, and Elaboration , 2004 .

[24]  Carroll J. Glynn.  The Communication of Public Opinion , 1987 .

[25]  Yujong Hwang,et al.  The moderating effects of gender on e-commerce systems adoption factors: An empirical investigation , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  Christina G. Cataldo.  Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge, by Eti-enne Wenger, Richard McDermott, & William M. Snyder. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2002. 284 pages, hard cover. , 2009 .

[27]  Vikas Mittal,et al.  Educating the families of nursing home residents: a pilot study using a computer-based system. , 2003, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[28]  N. Bozionelos,et al.  Psychology of Computer Use: XXXIX. Prevalence of Computer Anxiety in British Managers and Professionals , 1996, Psychological reports.

[29]  P. A. Dabholkar.  Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: An investigation of alternative models of service quality , 1996 .

[30]  Chang Liu,et al.  Mobile Data Service Demographics in Urban China , 2009, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Herman Wasserman,et al.  Is a New Worldwide Web Possible? An Explorative Comparison of the Use of ICTs by Two South African Social Movements , 2007, African Studies Review.

[32]  Mark Srite,et al.  Web Documents' Cultural Masculinity and Femininity , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  B. Byrne,et al.  Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. , 1989 .

[34]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Odd girl out: an individual differences perspective on women in the IT profession , 2002, Inf. Technol. People.

[35]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1965 .

[36]  Nitin Agarwal,et al.  Raising and Rising Voices in Social Media , 2012, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[37]  Lorenzo Mosca,et al.  Global-net for Global Movements? A Network of Networks for a Movement of Movements , 2005, Journal of Public Policy.

[38]  Karen Ruhleder.  Understanding on-line community: the affordances of virtual space , 2002, Inf. Res..

[39]  Sue Newell,et al.  The issue of gender within computing: reflections from the UK and Scandinavia , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[40]  S. Walsh,et al.  Me, my mobile, and I : the role of self- and prototypical identity influences in the prediction of mobile phone behavior , 2007 .

[41]  Amy Jo Kim,et al.  Community Building on the Web: Secret Strategies for Successful Online Communities , 2000 .

[42]  Ion Bogdan Vasi,et al.  The New Anti-war Protests and Miscible Mobilizations , 2006 .

[43]  Gerald C. Kane,et al.  Community relations 2.0. , 2009, Harvard business review.

[44]  Sidney Tarrow,et al.  Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics , 1994 .

[45]  Melanie Wilson,et al.  A conceptual framework for studying gender in information systems research , 2004, J. Inf. Technol..

[46]  M. D. Carpini,et al.  Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature , 2004 .

[47]  Lana F. Rakow.  Women making meaning : new feminist directions in communication , 1992 .

[48]  Jonathan Bishop,et al.  Increasing participation in online communities: A framework for human-computer interaction , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[49]  John Gastil,et al.  Increasing Political Sophistication Through Public Deliberation , 1999 .

[50]  Lauren Langman,et al.  From Virtual Public Spheres to Global Justice: A Critical Theory of Internetworked Social Movements* , 2005 .

[51]  D. Boyd,et al.  The Arab Spring| The Revolutions Were Tweeted: Information Flows during the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian Revolutions , 2011 .

[52]  Hernando Rojas,et al.  Weblogs, traditional sources online and political participation: an assessment of how the internet is changing the political environment , 2009, New Media Soc..

[53]  Ellen Garbarino,et al.  GENDER DIFFERENCES IN THE PERCEIVED RISK OF BUYING ONLINE AND THE EFFECTS OF RECEIVING A SITE RECOMMENDATION , 2004 .

[54]  Kevin Gillan.  THE UK ANTI-WAR MOVEMENT ONLINE , 2009 .

[55]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Can moral convictions motivate the advantaged to challenge social inequality? , 2011 .

[56]  Guobin Yang,et al.  China Since Tiananmen: Online Activism , 2009 .

[57]  F. Gilbert,et al.  Psychographic constructs and demographic segments , 1995 .

[58]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Network Communities: Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed ... , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[59]  S. J. Simon,et al.  Attitudes Towards Product Website Design: A Study of the Effects of Gender , 2005 .

[60]  Hua Wang,et al.  Understanding Online Community Participation , 2012, Commun. Res..

[61]  Conan C. Albrecht,et al.  Motivating Content Contributions to Online Communities: Toward a More Comprehensive Theory , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[62]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[63]  Mario Guerrero,et al.  Facebook and political engagement: A study of online political group membership and offline political engagement , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[64]  Brett Rolfe,et al.  Building an Electronic Repertoire of Contention , 2005 .

[65]  Robert Huckfeldt,et al.  Unanimity, Discord, and the Communication of Public Opinion , 2007 .

[66]  Stephen L. Elkin.  Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform , 1991 .

[67]  Evgeny V. Morozov,et al.  Iran: Downside to the "Twitter Revolution" , 2009 .

[68]  S. Fournier,et al.  Paradoxes of Technology: Consumer Cognizance, Emotions, and Coping Strategies , 1998 .

[69]  Vibeke Normann Andersen,et al.  How deliberation makes better citizens: The Danish Deliberative Poll on the euro , 2007 .

[70]  Bassam Hasan,et al.  Exploring gender differences in online shopping attitude , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[71]  David Gefen,et al.  If you spoke as she does, sir, instead of the way you do: a sociolinguistics perspective of gender differences in virtual communities , 2005, DATB.

[72]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Interpersonal Communication and News Comprehension , 1986 .

[73]  J. Alterman.  The Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted , 2011 .

[74]  Barry Friedman,et al.  Commentary: The impact of social networking tools on political change in Egypt's "Revolution 2.0" , 2011, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[75]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[76]  Shannon O'Lear,et al.  Networks of engagement: electronic communication and grassroots environmental activism in Kaliningrad , 1999 .

[77]  A. Orders.  Cultivating communities of practice , 2013 .

[78]  Julian Warner,et al.  Leonardo's Laptop: Human Needs and the New Computing Technologies , 2006, J. Documentation.

[79]  Sahar Khamis,et al.  Cyberactivism in the Egyptian Revolution: How Civic Engagement and Citizen Journalism Tilted the Balance , 2011 .

[80]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[81]  B. Wellman.  Computer Networks As Social Networks , 2001, Science.

[82]  Ohbyung Kwon,et al.  An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[83]  Susannah Fox,et al.  Generations online in 2009 , 2009 .

[84]  Rosanna E. Guadagno,et al.  Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[85]  M. Roblyer,et al.  Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[86]  Teresa Correa,et al.  Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users' personality and social media use , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[87]  Lauren Kessler,et al.  The dissident press : alternative journalism in American history , 1984 .

[88]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Applying Common Identity and Bond Theory to Design of Online Communities , 2007 .

[89]  Douglas Kellner,et al.  New Media and Internet Activism: From the ‘Battle of Seattle’ to Blogging , 2004, New Media Soc..

[90]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Technology Readiness Index (Tri) , 2000 .

[91]  R. Gottlieb,et al.  The New Yorker , 1987 .

[92]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research , 1998 .

[93]  T. L. Schwartz.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1986 .

[94]  Barbara Mayer.  Techno Ready Marketing How And Why Your Customers Adopt Technology , 2016 .

[95]  Christian Breunig,et al.  Communication and Political Mobilization: Digital Media and the Organization of Anti-Iraq War Demonstrations in the U.S. , 2008 .

[96]  Sandra Smeltzer,et al.  Won't You Be My (Political) Friend? The Changing Face(book) of Socio-Political Contestation in Malaysia , 2010 .

[97]  R. Vandenberg,et al.  A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research , 2000 .

[98]  Thurasamy Ramayah,et al.  Integrating information technology in the construction industry: Technology readiness assessment of Malaysian contractors , 2007 .

[99]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success , 2001, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[100]  R. Brislin.  Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research , 1970 .

[101]  J. Miller,et al.  Toward a new psychology of women , 1976 .

[102]  Zeynep Tufekci,et al.  Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations From Tahrir Square , 2012 .

[103]  M. Castells.  ”Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age”. , 2019 .

[104]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World , 2008 .

[105]  J. Birks.  Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age , 2014 .

[106]  Christine B. Williams,et al.  Web 2.0 and Politics: The 2008 U.S. Presidential Election and an E-Politics Research Agenda , 2010, MIS Q..

[107]  S. Keeter,et al.  What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters , 1996 .

[108]  Joris Verhulst.  February 15, 2003: The World Says No to War , 2010 .

[109]  Jody C. Baumgartner,et al.  MyFaceTube Politics , 2010 .

[110]  W. Andrew Taylor,et al.  Computer-mediated knowledge sharing and individual user differences: an exploratory study , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[111]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Model of Adoption and Technology in Households: A Baseline Model Test and Extension Incorporating Household Life Cycle , 2005, MIS Q..

[112]  Juan Meng,et al.  Assessing Chinese Consumers Likelihood To Adopt Self-Service Technologies , 2011 .