Model improvements to simulate charging in SEM

Charging of insulators is a complex phenomenon to simulate since the accuracy of the simulations is very sensitive to the interaction of electrons with matter and electric fields. In this study, we report model improvements for a previously developed Monte-Carlo simulator to more accurately simulate samples that charge. The improvements include both modelling of low energy electron scattering and charging of insulators. The new first-principle scattering models provide a more realistic charge distribution cloud in the material, and a better match between non-charging simulations and experimental results. Improvements on charging models mainly focus on redistribution of the charge carriers in the material with an induced conductivity (EBIC) and a breakdown model, leading to a smoother distribution of the charges. Combined with a more accurate tracing of low energy electrons in the electric field, we managed to reproduce the dynamically changing charging contrast due to an induced positive surface potential.

[1]  Sushant Sachdeva,et al.  Approximate Gaussian Elimination for Laplacians - Fast, Sparse, and Simple , 2016, 2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[2]  H. Fitting,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of secondary electron emission from the insulator SiO2 , 2002 .

[3]  Michael T. Postek,et al.  Comparison of Electron Imaging Modes for Dimensional Measurements in the Scanning Electron Microscope † , 2016, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[4]  David C. Joy,et al.  An empirical stopping power relationship for low‐energy electrons , 1989 .

[5]  I. De,et al.  Analytic models for the kinetics of generating a voltage contrast signal from contact plugs used in integrated circuits , 2007 .

[6]  T. Verduin,et al.  Quantum Noise Effects in e-Beam Lithography and Metrology , 2017 .

[8]  J. C. Ashley.  Interaction of low-energy electrons with condensed matter: stopping powers and inelastic mean free paths from optical data , 1988 .

[9]  Mauro Ciappa,et al.  New integrated Monte Carlo code for the simulation of high-resolution scanning electron microscopy images for metrology in microlithography , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Michael T. Postek,et al.  Reference material (RM) 8820: a versatile new NIST standard for nanometrology , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[11]  Aleksander Jablonski,et al.  ELSEPA - Dirac partial-wave calculation of elastic scattering of electrons and positrons by atoms, positive ions and molecules , 2005, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[12]  J. Cazaux.  On some contrast reversals in SEM: application to metal/insulator systems. , 2008, Ultramicroscopy.

[13]  H. Fitting,et al.  Secondary electron emission and self-consistent charge transport in semi-insulating samples , 2011 .

[14]  A. Mokhtari.  Effective mass in diluted magnetic semiconductors: Zn0.98Ti0.02O by means of magneto-optics , 2013 .

[15]  Z. Ding,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation of CD-SEM images for linewidth and critical dimension metrology. , 2013, Scanning.

[16]  Masatoshi Kotera,et al.  A simulation of keV electron scatterings in a charged‐up specimen , 1988 .

[17]  J.-Ch. Kuhr,et al.  Monte‐Carlo Simulation of Low Energy Electron Scattering in Solids , 1999 .

[18]  Erik René Kieft,et al.  Refinement of Monte Carlo simulations of electron–specimen interaction in low-voltage SEM , 2008 .

[19]  N. Tamura,et al.  The Effect of Accumulated Charge on Depth Dose Profile in Poly(Methylmethacrylate) Irradiated with Fast Electron Beam , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[20]  Modeling of Electron Beam Charging of an Insulating Layer on a Silicon Substrate , 2011 .

[21]  András E Vladár,et al.  Does your SEM really tell the truth? How would you know? Part 4: Charging and its mitigation , 2015, SPIE Scanning Microscopies.

[22]  Safa Kasap,et al.  Principles of electronic materials and devices , 2000 .

[23]  U. Rößler,et al.  Group IV Elements, IV-IV and III-V Compounds. Part b - Electronic, Transport, Optical and Other Properties , 2002 .

[24]  Jon Orloff,et al.  Handbook of Charged Particle Optics , 1997 .

[25]  J. Ganachaud,et al.  Theoretical study of the secondary electron emission of insulating targets , 1995 .

[26]  Gian Francesco Lorusso,et al.  Three-dimensional simulation of top down scanning electron microscopy images , 2004 .

[27]  Yvan Notay,et al.  Recursive Krylov‐based multigrid cycles , 2008, Numer. Linear Algebra Appl..

[28]  R. D. Foltz.  CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics:A Ready-Reference Book of Chemical and Physical Data , 2000 .

[29]  Gian Francesco Lorusso,et al.  Simulations of scanning electron microscopy imaging and charging of insulating structures , 2006 .

[30]  Kerim T. Arat,et al.  Electric fields in Scanning Electron Microscopy simulations , 2016, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[31]  R. J. Kline,et al.  Scanning electron microscope measurement of width and shape of 10nm patterned lines using a JMONSEL-modeled library. , 2015, Ultramicroscopy.

[32]  H. Haussecker,et al.  Scanning electron microscope charging effect model for chromium/quartz photolithography masks. , 2006, Scanning.

[33]  Sergey Babin,et al.  CHARIOT: Software tool for modeling SEM signal and e-beam lithography , 2008 .

[34]  M. Kotera,et al.  Dynamic Simulation of Electron-Beam-Induced Chargingup of Insulators , 1999, Digest of Papers. Microprocesses and Nanotechnology '99. 1999 International Microprocesses and Nanotechnology Conference.

[35]  P. Echlin,et al.  Scanning Electron Microscopy , 2014 .

[36]  Takeo Ichinokawa,et al.  Charging Effect of Specimen in Scanning Electron Microscopy , 1974 .

[37]  Mark P. Davidson,et al.  Investigation of the effects of charging in SEM-based CD metrology , 1997, Advanced Lithography.

[38]  S. Babin,et al.  Contrast reversal effect in scanning electron microscopy due to charging , 2009 .