Action observation can prime visual object recognition

Observing an action activates action representations in the motor system. Moreover, the representations of manipulable objects are closely linked to the motor systems at a functional and neuroanatomical level. Here, we investigated whether action observation can facilitate object recognition using an action priming paradigm. As prime stimuli we presented short video movies showing hands performing an action in interaction with an object (where the object itself was always removed from the video). The prime movie was followed by a (briefly presented) target object affording motor interactions that are either similar (congruent condition) or dissimilar (incongruent condition) to the prime action. Participants had to decide whether an object name shown after the target picture corresponds with the picture or not (picture–word matching task). We found superior accuracy for prime–target pairs with congruent as compared to incongruent actions across two experiments. Thus, action observation can facilitate recognition of a manipulable object typically involving a similar action. This action priming effect supports the notion that action representations play a functional role in object recognition.

[1]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  T. Shallice,et al.  Category specific semantic impairments. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  E. Warrington,et al.  Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Cascade processes in picture identification , 1988 .

[5]  W. Prinz,et al.  Relationships Between Perception and Action: Current Approaches , 1990 .

[6]  W. Prinz A common-coding approach to perception and action , 1990 .

[7]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Calling a squirrel a squirrel but a canoe a wigwam: a category-specific deficit for artefactual objects and body parts , 1992 .

[9]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography , 1994, Nature.

[10]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Discrete Cortical Regions Associated with Knowledge of Color and Knowledge of Action , 1995, Science.

[11]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[13]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[14]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge , 1996, Nature.

[15]  E. Procyk,et al.  Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subject's strategy. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Premotor Cortex Activation during Observation and Naming of Familiar Tools , 1997, NeuroImage.

[17]  J. Decety,et al.  Top down effect of strategy on the perception of human biological motion: a pet investigation. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[18]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Activation of human primary motor cortex during action observation: a neuromagnetic study. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  J. Haxby,et al.  Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  S. Cochin,et al.  Observation and execution of movement: similarities demonstrated by quantified electroencephalography , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.

[22]  Olaf B. Paulson,et al.  The role of action knowledge in the comprehension of artefacts— A PET study , 2000, NeuroImage.

[23]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[24]  R. Ellis,et al.  The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization , 2001 .

[25]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: Event-related potentials during picture and word categorization , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  The limits of a distributed account of conceptual knowledge , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  M. Jeannerod Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition , 2001, NeuroImage.

[28]  J. Decety,et al.  Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Grasping the meaning of words , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  The MPI VideoLab: A system for high quality synchronous recording of video and audio from multiple viewpoints , 2004 .

[32]  R. Ellis,et al.  Action priming by briefly presented objects. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[33]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Visual Recognition As Soon as You Know It Is There, You Know What It Is , 2022 .

[35]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Repetition-priming Modulates Category-related Effects on Event-related Potentials: Further Evidence for Multiple Cortical Semantic Systems , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[37]  Markus Graf,et al.  The role of action representations in visual object recognition , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  Olaf Hauk,et al.  Experience-dependent Plasticity of Conceptual Representations in Human Sensory-Motor Areas , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  Alex Martin,et al.  A neural system for learning about object function. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  Edouard Machery,et al.  Concept empiricism: A methodological critique , 2007, Cognition.

[41]  Giacomo Rizzolatti Comprar Mirrors in the Brain - How our minds share actions, emotions, and experience | Giacomo Rizzolatti | 9780199217984 | Oxford University Press , 2007 .

[42]  M. Kiefer,et al.  The Sound of Concepts: Four Markers for a Link between Auditory and Conceptual Brain Systems , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  Conceptual Flexibility in the Human Brain: Dynamic Recruitment of Semantic Maps from Visual, Motor, and Motion-related Areas , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Temporal prediction of touch instant during observation of human and robot grasping , 2008, Brain Research Bulletin.

[45]  Jack W. Tsao,et al.  Mirrors in the Brain: How Our Minds Share Actions, Emotions, and Experience, Giacomo Rizzolatti, Corrado Sinigaglia, translated by Frances Anderson, Oxford University Press (2006), ISBN-13: 978-0-19-921798-4, 242 pages, $49.95 , 2009, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[46]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Motor Involvement in Action and Object Perception: Similarity and Complementarity , 2010 .