Technology Use in the Virtual R&D Teams

Problem statement: Although, literature proves the importance of the technology role in the effectiveness of virtual Research and Development (R&D) teams for new product development. However, the factors that make technology construct in a virtual R&D team are still ambiguous. The manager of virtual R&D teams for new product development does not know which type of technology should be used. Approach: To address the gap and answer the question, the study presents a set of factors that make a technology construct. The proposed construct modified by finding of the field survey (N = 240). We empirically examine the relationship between construct and its factors by employing the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). A measurement model built base on the 19 preliminary factors that extracted from literature review. The result shows 10 factors out of 19 factors maintaining to make technology construct. Results: These 10 technology factors can be grouped into two constructs namely Web base communication and Web base data sharing. The findings can help new product development managers of enterprises to concentrate in the main factors for leading an effective virtual R&D team. In addition, it provides a guideline for software developers as well. Conclusion: The second and third generation technologies are now more suitable for developing new products through virtual R&D teams.

[1]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  It's the Thought that Counts: The Mediating Effects of Information Processing in Virtual Team Decision Making , 2008, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[2]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  CAIRO: a concurrent engineering meeting environment for virtual design teams , 2000, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[3]  Justin B. Craig,et al.  Fueling Innovation through Information Technology in SMEs* , 2008 .

[4]  S. Sills,et al.  Innovations in Survey Research , 2002 .

[5]  David J. Pauleen,et al.  Facilitating virtual team relationships via Internet and conventional communication channels , 2001, Internet Res..

[6]  J. Kratzer,et al.  Keeping Virtual R&D Teams Creative , 2005 .

[7]  Chad Lin,et al.  A model to develop effective virtual teams , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[9]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective , 2003 .

[10]  Shamsuddin Ahmed Mohammed Shahadat,et al.  Virtual R&D teams and SMEs growth: A comparative study between Iranian and Malaysian SMEs , 2010 .

[11]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Self-assessment of conflict management in client-supplier collaborative new product development , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[12]  Chi-Cheng Huang.  Knowledge sharing and group cohesiveness on performance: An empirical study of technology R&D teams in Taiwan , 2009 .

[13]  Jean Carletta,et al.  Virtual team meetings: An analysis of communication and context , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Mahesh S. Raisinghani,et al.  An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[15]  Elitsa Vasileva Shumarova,et al.  Authority-based and bottom-up diffusion of collaboration information technologies: constraints and enablements , 2009 .

[16]  Shamsuddin Ahmed,et al.  Virtual R&D teams in small and medium enterprises: a literature review , 2009 .

[17]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with AMOS , 2010 .

[18]  Miguel López-Coronado,et al.  A model for the assessment and development of Internet-based information and communication services in small and medium enterprises , 2008 .

[19]  V. Kotelnikov,et al.  Small and Medium Enterprises and ICT , 2014 .

[20]  Nader Ale Ebrahim,et al.  Modified stage-gate: A conceptual model of virtual product development process , 2009 .

[21]  Minder Chen,et al.  TeamSpirit: Design, implementation, and evaluation of a Web-based group decision support system , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[22]  Daphne M. Dekker,et al.  Cultural differences in the perception of critical interaction behaviors in global virtual teams , 2008 .

[23]  David Coleman,et al.  Collaboration 2.0: Technology and Best Practices for Successful Collaboration in a Web 2.0 World , 2008 .

[24]  Nader Ale Ebrahim,et al.  The Effectiveness of Virtual R&D Teams in SMEs: Experiences of Malaysian SMEs , 2012, ArXiv.

[25]  Liz Lee-Kelley,et al.  Global virtual teams for value creation and project success: A case study , 2008 .

[26]  S. Sills,et al.  Innovations in Survey Research , 2002 .

[27]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  External technology integration in product and process development , 2004 .

[28]  K. Hinson,et al.  Handbook of Research on Virtual Workplaces and the New Nature of Business Practices (Zemliansky, P. and St. Amant, K.) [Book Review] , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[29]  Mei Lu,et al.  How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[30]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[31]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[32]  Linda R. Elliott,et al.  Empowering followers in virtual teams: Guiding principles from theory and practice , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  Chan Huah Yong,et al.  Utility-Based Policy Management System for Virtual Organization , 2009 .

[34]  Zahari Taha,et al.  Virtual Teams: A Literature Review , 2009 .

[35]  M. Rita Thissen,et al.  Communication tools for distributed software development teams , 2007, SIGMIS CPR '07.

[36]  R. Baskerville,et al.  Activating and Perpetuating Virtual Teams: Now That We're Mobile, Where Do We Go? , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[37]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .