Can the Okhotsk Plate be discriminated from the North American plate

The plate geometry in northeast Asia has been a long-standing question, with a major issue being whether the Sea of Okhotsk and northern Japanese islands are better regarded as part of the North American plate or as a separate Okhotsk plate. This question has been difficult to resolve, because earthquake slip vectors along the Kuril and Japan trenches are consistent with either Pacific-North America or Pacific-Okhotsk plate motion. To circumvent this difficulty, we also use slip vectors of earthquakes along Sakhalin Island and the eastern margin of the Japan Sea and compare them to the predicted Eurasia-Okhotsk and Eurasia-North America motions. For a model with a separate Okhotsk plate, we invert 10 Eurasia-Okhotsk and 255 Pacific-Okhotsk slip vectors with Pacific-North America and Eurasia-North America NUVEL-1 data. Alternatively, for a model without an Okhotsk plate, those Eurasia-Okhotsk and Pacific-Okhotsk data are regarded as Eurasia-North America and Pacific-North America data, respectively. The model with an Okhotsk plate fits the data better than one in which this region is treated as part of the North American plate. Because the improved fit exceeds that expected purely from the additional plate, the data indicate that the Okhotsk plate can be resolved from the North American plate. The motions on the Okhotsk plate's boundaries predicted by the best fitting Euler vectors are generally consistent with the recent tectonics. The Eurasia-Okhotsk pole is located at northernmost Sakhalin Island and predicts right-lateral strike slip motion on the NNE striking fault plane of the May 27, 1995, Neftegorsk earthquake, consistent with the centroid moment tensor focal mechanism and the surface faulting. Along the northern boundary of the Okhotsk plate, the North America-Okhotsk Euler vector predicts left-lateral strike slip, consistent with the observed focal mechanisms. On the NW boundary of the Okhotsk plate, the Eurasia-Okhotsk Euler vector predicts E-W extension, discordant with the limited focal mechanisms and geological data. This misfit may imply that another plate is necessary west of the Magadan region in southeast Siberia, but this possibility is hard to confirm without further data, such as might be obtained from space-based geodesy.

[1]  Michael B. Heflin,et al.  Plate motion and crustal deformation estimated with geodetic data from the Global Positioning System , 1995 .

[2]  辻 宏道 Detection of plate motions around Japan based on daily GPS measurements , 1995 .

[3]  Richard G. Gordon,et al.  Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of current plate motions , 1994 .

[4]  L. Jolivet,et al.  Neogene strike-slip faulting in Sakhalin and the Japan Sea opening , 1994 .

[5]  L. Ruff,et al.  Unusual rupture process of the Japan Sea earthquake , 1993 .

[6]  S. Wesnousky,et al.  Slip partitioning along major convergent plate boundaries , 1993 .

[7]  G. Lyzenga,et al.  Constraints on interseismic deformation at Japan Trench from VLBI data , 1993 .

[8]  K. Fujita,et al.  Extrusion tectonics of the Okhotsk Plate, northeast Asia , 1993 .

[9]  H. Kawakatsu,et al.  Significance of non-double couple components of deep and intermediate-depth earthquakes: implications from moment tensor inversions of long-period seismic waves , 1993 .

[10]  M. Steckler,et al.  Late Tertiary subsidence history of the southern Levant Margin, eastern Mediterranean Sea, and its implications to the understanding of the Messinian Event , 1992 .

[11]  C. Demets Oblique convergence and deformation along the Kuril and Japan Trenches , 1992 .

[12]  C. Demets A test of present-day plate geometries for northeast Asia and Japan , 1992 .

[13]  R. Mccaffrey Oblique plate convergence, slip vectors, and forearc deformation , 1992 .

[14]  Preliminary determination of Pacfic‐North America relative motion in the southern Gulf of Calfornia using the Global Positioning System , 1991 .

[15]  S. Stein,et al.  Present-day kinematics of the Rivera Plate and implications for tectonics in southwestern Mexico , 1990 .

[16]  D. Argus,et al.  Pacific-North American plate motion from very long baseline interferometry compared with motion inferred from magnetic anomalies, transform faults, and earthquake slip vectors , 1990 .

[17]  T. Kondo,et al.  Contraction of northeastern Japan: evidence from horizontal displacement of a Japanese station in global very long baseline interferometry networks , 1990 .

[18]  H. Hasegawa,et al.  Seismicity and focal mechanisms of the Arctic region and the North American plate boundary in Asia , 1990 .

[19]  James Jackson,et al.  ACTIVE DEFORMATION OF THE CONTINENTS , 1989 .

[20]  T. Seno,et al.  Seismotectonics at the Trench-Trench-Trench triple junction off central Honshu , 1989 .

[21]  Richard G. Gordon,et al.  Current plate motions , 1990 .

[22]  K. Fujita,et al.  Present-day plate interactions in Northeast Asia: North American, Eurasian, and Okhotsk plates , 1986 .

[23]  T. Sasatani,et al.  Accurate Determination of Source Depths and Focal Mechanisms of Shallow Earthquakes Occurring at the Junction between the Kurile and the Japan Trenches , 1986 .

[24]  E. Honza,et al.  Incipient subduction and deduction along the eastern margin of the Japan Sea , 1985 .

[25]  T. Seno Is northern Honshu a microplate , 1985 .

[26]  K. Satake The mechanism of the 1983 Japan Sea earthquake as inferred from long-period surface waves and tsunamis , 1985 .

[27]  Richard G. Gordon,et al.  Statistical tests of additional plate boundaries from plate motion inversions , 1984 .

[28]  H. Kawakatsu,et al.  Triple seismic zone and the regional variation of seismicity along the Northern Honshu Arc , 1983 .

[29]  T. Seno,et al.  A REEXAMINATION OF EARTHQUAKES PREVIOUSLY THOUGHT TO HAVE OCCURRED WITHIN THE SLAB BETWEEN THE TRENCH AXIS AND DOUBLE SEISMIC ZONE, NORTHERN HONSHU ARC , 1983 .

[30]  P. R. Cobbold,et al.  Propagating extrusion tectonics in Asia: New insights from simple experiments with plasticine , 1982 .

[31]  T. Seno,et al.  A triple-planed structure of seismicity and earthquake mechanisms at the subduction zone off Miyagi Prefecture, northern Honshu, Japan , 1981 .

[32]  L. Zonenshain,et al.  Geodynamics of the Baikal rift zone and plate tectonics of Asia , 1981 .

[33]  John H. Woodhouse,et al.  Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity , 1981 .

[34]  K. Shimazaki,et al.  Rupture process of the Miyagi-Oki, Japan, earthquake of June 12, 1978 , 1980 .

[35]  C. G. Chase Plate kinematics: The Americas, East Africa, and the rest of the world , 1978 .

[36]  Y. Izutani,et al.  SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS OF SHALLOW EARTHQUAKES IN THE NORTHERN PART OF SANRIKU-OKI REGION, JAPAN , 1978 .

[37]  Thomas H. Jordan,et al.  Present‐day plate motions , 1977 .

[38]  S. Solomon,et al.  North American‐Eurasian Plate Boundary in northeast Asia , 1976 .

[39]  W. Stauder,et al.  Fault motion in the larger earthquakes of the Kurile‐Kamchatka Arc and of the Kurile‐Hokkaido corner , 1976 .

[40]  H. Kanamori Re-examination of the earth's free oxcillations excited by the Kamchatka earthquake of November 4, 1952 , 1976 .

[41]  K. Abe,et al.  FOCAL MECHANISM OF THE IWATE-OKI EARTHQUAKE OF JUNE 12, 1968 , 1976 .

[42]  P. Molnar,et al.  Cenozoic Tectonics of Asia: Effects of a Continental Collision: Features of recent continental tectonics in Asia can be interpreted as results of the India-Eurasia collision. , 1975, Science.

[43]  M. Furumoto,et al.  Mechanism of large earthquakes along the eastern margin of the Japan sea , 1975 .

[44]  H. Hotta,et al.  Seismic Refraction and Reflection Evidence Supporting Plate Tectonics in Hokkaido , 1973 .

[45]  H. Kanamori Focal mechanism of the Tokachi-Oki earthquake of may 16, 1968: Contortion of the lithosphere at a junction of two trenches , 1971 .

[46]  W. J. Morgan,et al.  Rises, trenches, great faults, and crustal blocks , 1968 .

[47]  Tomowo Hirasawa Source Mechanism of the Niigata Earthquake of June 16, 1964, as Derived from Body Waves , 1965 .