Most biometric verification techniques make decisions based solely on a score that represents the similarity of the query template with the reference template of the claimed identity stored in the database. When multiple templates are available, a fusion scheme can be designed using the similarities with these templates. Combining several templates to construct a composite template and selecting a set of useful templates has also been reported in addition to usual multi-classifier fusion methods when multiple matchers are available. These commonly adopted techniques rarely make use of the large number of non-matching templates in the database or training set. In this paper, we highlight the usefulness of such a fusion scheme while focusing on the problem of fingerprint verification. For each enrolled template, we identify its cohorts (similar fingerprints) based on a selection criterion. The similarity scores of the query template with the reference template and its cohorts from the database are used to make the final verification decision using two approaches: a likelihood ratio based normalization scheme and a Support Vector Machine (SVM)-based classifier. We demonstrate the accuracy improvements using the proposed method with no a priori knowledge about the database or the matcher under consideration using a publicly available database and matcher. Using our cohort selection procedure and the trained SVM, we show that accuracy can be significantly improved at the expense of few extra matches.
[1]
Venu Govindaraju,et al.
Combining matching scores in identification model
,
2005,
Eighth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR'05).
[2]
Arun Ross,et al.
Biometric template selection and update: a case study in fingerprints
,
2004,
Pattern Recognit..
[3]
Raymond N. J. Veldhuis,et al.
Likelihood-ratio-based biometric verification
,
2004,
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.
[4]
Xudong Jiang,et al.
Online Fingerprint Template Improvement
,
2002,
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..
[5]
Anil K. Jain,et al.
FVC2002: Second Fingerprint Verification Competition
,
2002,
Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.
[6]
Javier Ortega-Garcia,et al.
Facing Position Variability in Minutiae-Based Fingerprint Verification through Multiple References and Score Normalization Techniques
,
2003,
AVBPA.
[7]
Douglas A. Reynolds,et al.
Comparison of background normalization methods for text-independent speaker verification
,
1997,
EUROSPEECH.
[8]
Hakil Kim,et al.
Super-template Generation Using Successive Bayesian Estimation for Fingerprint Enrollment
,
2005,
AVBPA.
[9]
Sharath Pankanti,et al.
Guide to Biometrics
,
2003,
Springer Professional Computing.
[10]
Arun Ross,et al.
Biometric Template Selection: A Case Study in Fingerprints
,
2003,
AVBPA.