Inter-organisational electronic information sharing in local g2g settings: a socio-technical issue

Local Government Authorities (LGAs) are information-intensive organisations. To satisfy their information requirements effective information sharing within and among LGAs is necessary (internally among departments and externally with other authorities). The problem of InterOrganisational Information Sharing (IOIS) has been regarded as inevitable for the public sector. Despite a decade of active research and practice in this complex problem area, the field lacks a comprehensive framework to examine the factors affecting Electronic Information Sharing (EIS) among government bodies at the local level. The research presented in this paper contributes toward resolving this problem by developing a conceptual framework of factors affecting EIS in Governmentto-Government (G2G) collaboration. By presenting this framework, we attempt to clarify that information sharing in LGAs is a combination of environmental, organisational, business process and technological factors and should not be scrutinised from merely a technical perspective. To validate our conceptual findings, a multiple case study based research strategy was adopted. From an analysis of the empirical data collected from two case organisations, this paper exemplifies the importance of these factors in influencing EIS and offering LGA officials with specific advice on how to better interpret EIS and its underlying problems. The paper should be of interest to both academics and practitioners who are interested in IOIS, in general, and collaborative e-Government, in particular. Keyword: Electronic Information Sharing, Information Integration, G2G collaboration, Local Government Authority, socio-technical factors

[1]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Trust in Government Cross-Boundary Information Sharing Initiatives: Identifying the Determinants , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[2]  Wing Lam,et al.  Barriers to e-government integration , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[3]  John P. Ulhøi,et al.  Government Agency and Trust in the Formation and Transformation of Interorganizational Entrepreneurial Networks , 2006 .

[4]  A. D. Jankowicz Business research projects , 1995 .

[5]  Jane E. Fountain,et al.  Public Sector: Early Stage of a Deep Transformation , 2001 .

[6]  Michael McGuire,et al.  Big Questions in Public Network Management Research , 2001 .

[7]  Stuart Bretschneider,et al.  Local government information technology capacity: an exploratory theory , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[8]  JinKyu Lee,et al.  Exploring the causes and effects of inter-agency information sharing systems adoption in the anti/counter-terrorism and disaster management domains , 2007, DG.O.

[9]  Lei Zheng,et al.  Leadership behaviors in cross-boundary information sharing and integration: comparing the US and China , 2009, ICEGOV '09.

[10]  Neil F. Doherty,et al.  From technical to socio-technical change: tackling the human and organizational aspects of systems development projects , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[11]  David Landsbergen,et al.  Realizing the Promise: Government Information Systems and the Fourth Generation of Information Technology , 2001 .

[12]  Ralf Klischewski,et al.  E-Government Integration and Interoperability: Framing the Research Agenda , 2007 .

[13]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Government Leadership in Multi-Sector IT-Enabled Networks: Lessons from the Response to the West Nile Virus Outbreak , 2007 .

[14]  S. Dawes Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks , 1996 .

[15]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Interorganizational information integration: A key enabler for digital government , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[16]  F DohertyNeil,et al.  From technical to socio-technical change , 2005 .

[17]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Multinational E-Government Collaboration, Information Sharing, and Interoperability: An Integrative Model , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[18]  James C. Anderson Toward a Better Understanding of Distribution Channel Working Relationships , 1986 .

[19]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Perceived critical mass effect on groupware acceptance , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[20]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effectsof Interorganizational and Interpersonaltrust on Performance , 1998 .

[21]  Dan Remenyi,et al.  The nature of research: qualitative or quantitative, narrative or paradigmatic? , 1996, Inf. Syst. J..

[22]  Asli Yagmur Akbulut,et al.  To share or not to share? Examining the factors influencing local agency electronic information sharing , 2009, Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Implementing and managing eGovernment , 2007, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[24]  Asli Yagmur Akbulut,et al.  The role of ERP tools in supply chain information sharing, cooperation, and cost optimization , 2005 .

[25]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Investment justification of information systems : a focus on the evaluation of MRPII , 1998 .

[26]  David T. Wilson,et al.  Industrial Marketing: A German-American Perspective , 1985 .

[27]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Supply chain information sharing in a macro prediction market , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[28]  Sue R. Faerman,et al.  UNDERSTANDING INTERORGANIZATIONAL COOPERATION: PUBLIC-PRIVATE COLLABORATION IN REGULATING FINANCIAL MARKET INNOVATION. , 1999 .