What does the eye see best?

Our eyes see so much in such varied conditions that one might consider the question posed in the title to be meaningless, but we show here that, within the range that we have been able to test, there is a particular spatiotemporal pattern of light that is detected better than any other. At least two plausible theories of visual detection predict that a stimulus will be seen best (will have greatest quantum efficiency) when it matches the weighting function of the most efficient detector. We have measured quantum efficiency for detecting a wide variety of spatiotemporal patterns using foveal vision in bright light. The best stimulus found so far is a small, briefly exposed circular patch of sinusoidal grating having a spatial frequency of ∼7 c deg−1, drifting at ∼4 Hz. We propose that this is the weighting function of the most efficient human contrast detector. We believe this answer to the question is unexpected and may have fundamental implications with regard to the mechanisms of visual perception.

[1]  H. Barlow.  Summation and inhibition in the frog's retina , 1953, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  H. K. Hartline,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF SPATIAL SUMMATION IN THE RETINA ON THE EXCITATION OF THE FIBERS OF THE OPTIC NERVE , 1940 .

[3]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Cortical cells ; Bar and edge detectors, or spatial frequency filters , 1978 .

[4]  J. Robson,et al.  Discrimination at threshold: Labelled detectors in human vision , 1981, Vision Research.

[5]  Carl W. Helstrom,et al.  An expansion of a signal in Gaussian elementary signals (Corresp.) , 1966, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[6]  J P Thomas,et al.  Bandwidths of orientation channels in human vision. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[7]  A. Watson.  Summation of grating patches indicates many types of detector at one retinal location , 1982, Vision Research.

[8]  H. Barlow.  The efficiency of detecting changes of density in random dot patterns , 1978, Vision Research.

[9]  A. Watson.  Probability summation over time , 1979, Vision Research.

[10]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[11]  P. Lennie.  Parallel visual pathways: A review , 1980, Vision Research.

[12]  Theodore G. Birdsall,et al.  Definitions of d′ and η as Psychophysical Measures , 1958 .

[13]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  S Marcelja,et al.  Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[15]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.

[16]  J. Movshon,et al.  Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.