Robust Design Optimization Under Mixed Uncertainties With Stochastic Expansions

The objective of this paper is to introduce a computationally efficient and accurate approach for robust optimization under mixed (aleatory and epistemic) uncertainties using stochastic expansions that are based on nonintrusive polynomial chaos (NIPC) method. This approach utilizes stochastic response surfaces obtained with NIPC methods to approximate the objective function and the constraints in the optimization formulation. The objective function includes a weighted sum of the stochastic measures, which are minimized simultaneously to ensure the robustness of the final design to both inherent and epistemic uncertainties. The optimization approach is demonstrated on two model problems with mixed uncertainties: (1) the robust design optimization of a slider-crank mechanism and (2) robust design optimization of a beam. The stochastic expansions are created with two different NIPC methods, Point-Collocation and Quadrature-Based NIPC. The optimization results are compared to the results of another robust optimization technique that utilizes double-loop Monte Carlo sampling (MCS) for the propagation of mixed uncertainties. The optimum designs obtained with two different optimization approaches agree well in both model problems; however, the number of function evaluations required for the stochastic expansion based approach is much less than the number required by the Monte Carlo based approach, indicating the computational efficiency of the optimization technique introduced.

[1]  D. Xiu,et al.  Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos , 2003 .

[2]  Serhat Hosder,et al.  Multistep Uncertainty Quantification Approach Applied to Hypersonic Reentry Flows , 2014 .

[3]  Geoffrey T. Parks,et al.  Robust Aerodynamic Design Optimization Using Polynomial Chaos , 2009 .

[4]  Habib N. Najm,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification and Polynomial Chaos Techniques in Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2009 .

[5]  Xiaoping Du,et al.  Robust Mechanism synthesis with random and interval variables , 2009 .

[6]  Genichi Taguchi,et al.  Taguchi on Robust Technology Development: Bringing Quality Engineering Upstream , 1992 .

[7]  Gary Tang,et al.  Mixed aleatory-epistemic uncertainty quantification with stochastic expansions and optimization-based interval estimation , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  R. Walters,et al.  Non-Intrusive Polynomial Chaos Methods for Uncertainty Quantification in Fluid Dynamics , 2010 .

[9]  M. Eldred,et al.  Evaluation of Non-Intrusive Approaches for Wiener-Askey Generalized Polynomial Chaos. , 2008 .

[10]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  Numerical optimization techniques for engineering design , 1999 .

[11]  Michael S. Eldred,et al.  Epistemic Uncertainty in the Calculation of Margins , 2009 .

[12]  Bernhard Sendhoff,et al.  Robust Optimization - A Comprehensive Survey , 2007 .

[13]  Serhat Hosder,et al.  A Multi-Step Uncertainty Quantification Approach Applied to Hypersonic Re-Entry Flows , 2013 .

[14]  H. Elman,et al.  DESIGN UNDER UNCERTAINTY EMPLOYING STOCHASTIC EXPANSION METHODS , 2008 .

[15]  N. Wiener.  The Homogeneous Chaos , 1938 .

[16]  R. Walters,et al.  Point-Collocation Nonintrusive Polynomial Chaos Method for Stochastic Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2010 .

[17]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  An exploration of alternative approaches to the representation of uncertainty in model predictions , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Serhat Hosder,et al.  Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis for Reentry Flows with Inherent and Model-Form Uncertainties , 2012 .