How New and Assertive Is China's New Assertiveness?

There has been a rapidly spreading meme in U.S. pundit and academic circles since 2010 that describes China's recent diplomacy as “newly assertive.” This “new assertiveness” meme suffers from two problems. First, it underestimates the complexity of key episodes in Chinese diplomacy in 2010 and overestimates the amount of change. Second, the explanations for the new assertiveness claim suffer from unclear causal mechanisms and lack comparative rigor that would better contextualize China's diplomacy in 2010. An examination of seven cases in Chinese diplomacy at the heart of the new assertiveness meme finds that, in some instances, China's policy has not changed; in others, it is actually more moderate; and in still others, it is a predictable reaction to changed external conditions. In only one case—maritime disputes—does one see more assertive Chinese rhetoric and behavior. The speed and extent with which the newly assertive meme has emerged point to an understudied issue in international relations—namely, the role that online media and the blogosphere play in the creation of conventional wisdoms that might, in turn, constrain policy debates. The assertive China discourse may be a harbinger of this effect as a Sino-U.S. security dilemma emerges.

[1]  J. Åberg.  The Asian Games: Modern Metaphor for ‘The Middle Kingdom’ Reborn – Political Statement, Cultural Assertion, Social Symbol , 2014 .

[2]  M. McCombs.  A Look at Agenda-setting: past, present and future , 2005 .

[3]  Tanni Haas,et al.  From “Public Journalism” to the “Public's Journalism”? Rhetoric and reality in the discourse on weblogs , 2005 .

[4]  Chien-Kai Chen.  China-Taiwan Relations Through the Lens of the Interaction Between China’s Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits and Taiwan’s Straits Exchange Foundation , 2014 .

[5]  F. Gobet,et al.  Risk taking in adversarial situations: Civilization differences in chess experts , 2015, Cognition.

[6]  T. Hopf.  The logic of habit in International Relations , 2010 .

[7]  Managerial Ideology and the Social Control of Deviance in Organizations. , 1986 .

[8]  M. Taylor Fravel,et al.  China’s Assertive Behavior – Part Two: The Maritime Periphery , 2011 .

[9]  Murray Edelman,et al.  Political Language: Words That Succeed and Policies That Fail , 1977 .

[10]  V. Cha.  The Impossible State: North Korea, Past and Future , 2012 .

[11]  Daniel W. Drezner.  Military Primacy Doesn't Pay (Nearly As Much As You Think) , 2013, International Security.

[12]  Kevin Wallsten,et al.  “Yes We Can”: How Online Viewership, Blog Discussion, Campaign Statements, and Mainstream Media Coverage Produced a Viral Video Phenomenon , 2010 .

[13]  Chris Ogden.  Handbook of China’s Governance and Domestic Politics , 2013 .

[14]  L. Flake,et al.  ASIA AT A TIPPING POINT: KOREA, THE RISE OF CHINA, AND THE IMPACT OF LEADERSHIP TRANSITIONS , 2012 .

[15]  P. Godwin,et al.  China's Forbearance Has Limits: Chinese Threat and Retaliation Signaling and Its Implications for a Sino-American Military Confrontation , 2013 .

[16]  James Reilly,et al.  Strong Society, Smart State: The Rise of Public Opinion in China's Japan Policy , 2011 .

[17]  K. Fierke.  Links Across the Abyss: Language and Logic in International Relations , 2002 .

[18]  Rocio Garcia-Retamero,et al.  Identity, Power, and Threat Perception , 2007 .

[19]  Kevin Wallsten.  Agenda Setting and the Blogosphere: An Analysis of the Relationship between Mainstream Media and Political Blogs , 2007 .

[20]  Stefaan Walgrave,et al.  The Mass Media's Political Agenda-Setting Power , 2008 .

[21]  Ken Booth,et al.  The Security Dilemma: Fear, Cooperation, and Trust in World Politics , 2007 .

[22]  Feng Zhang.  Rethinking China’s grand strategy: Beijing’s evolving national interests and strategic ideas in the reform era , 2012 .

[23]  Cheng Li.  China's Midterm Jockeying: Gearing Up for 2012 (Part 3: Military Leaders) , 2012 .

[24]  G. Chan.  China Faces the World: Making Rules for a New Order? , 2013 .

[25]  J. Bader.  Obama and China's Rise: An Insider's Account of America's Asia Strategy , 2012 .

[26]  A. Hurrell.  Brazil and the New Global Order , 2010 .

[27]  G. Chiozza,et al.  Peace through Insecurity , 2003 .

[28]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  Anti-Americanisms in World Politics , 2018 .

[29]  D. Shaw,et al.  The Evolution of Agenda-Setting Research: Twenty-Five Years in the Marketplace of Ideas , 1993 .

[30]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety , 2009, International Organization.

[31]  J. Weiss.  Authoritarian Signaling, Mass Audiences, and Nationalist Protest in China , 2013, International Organization.

[32]  Yuen Foong Khong.  Primacy or World Order? The United States and China's Rise—A Review Essay , 2014, International Security.

[33]  Shogo Suzuki.  The rise of the Chinese ‘Other’ in Japan's construction of identity: Is China a focal point of Japanese nationalism? , 2015 .

[34]  Victor C. Shih,et al.  Gauging the Elite Political Equilibrium in the CCP: A Quantitative Approach Using Biographical Data* , 2010, The China Quarterly.

[35]  Kai He.  Contested regional orders and institutional balancing in the Asia Pacific , 2015 .

[36]  Shanto Iyengar,et al.  News Coverage of the Gulf Crisis and Public Opinion , 1993 .

[37]  Liviu Horovitz.  Beyond Pessimism: Why the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Will Not Collapse , 2015 .

[38]  Jon R. Lindsay,et al.  The Impact of China on Cybersecurity: Fiction and Friction , 2015, International Security.

[39]  Etel Solingen.  Domestic Coalitions, Internationalization, and War: Then and Now , 2014, International Security.

[40]  Markus Prior,et al.  Predisposing Factors and Situational Triggers: Exclusionary Reactions to Immigrant Minorities , 2004, American Political Science Review.

[41]  Cindy D. Kam,et al.  Us Against Them: Ethnocentric Foundations of American Opinion , 2010 .

[42]  M. T. Fravel.  China’s Strategy in the South China Sea , 2011 .

[43]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm , 1993 .

[44]  G. Walejko,et al.  BLOGGING FROM THE NICHES , 2010 .

[45]  M. Cox.  Is the United States in Decline Again? An Essay , 2007 .

[46]  Isaac B. Kardon.  Oil for the Lamps of China: Managing Uncertainty and Vulnerability in World Energy Markets , 2013 .

[47]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  Language and Symbolic Power , 1991 .

[48]  Marco Overhaus.  German Foreign Policy and the Shadow of the Past , 2005 .

[49]  Feng Zhang.  How hierarchic was the historical East Asian system? , 2014 .

[50]  A. Johnston,et al.  Debating China's Assertiveness , 2014, International Security.

[51]  H. Laurence.  Japan’s Proactive Foreign Policy and the Rise of the BRICs , 2007 .

[52]  J. Pollack.  No Exit: North Korea, Nuclear Weapons, and International Security , 2011 .

[53]  G. Ikenberry,et al.  Racing toward Tragedy?: China's Rise, Military Competition in the Asia Pacific, and the Security Dilemma , 2014, International Security.

[54]  Chien-pin Li.  New Leaders with Old Lenses? China’s Conflict Frames Toward Taiwan, 2003–2013 , 2015 .

[55]  W. Thompson.  Identifying Rivals and Rivalries in World Politics , 2001 .

[56]  Shiping Tang,et al.  The Security Dilemma: A Conceptual Analysis , 2009 .

[57]  T. Christensen.  The Advantages of an Assertive China , 2011 .

[58]  Marcus Messner,et al.  THE SOURCE CYCLE , 2008 .