Blood Pressure Targets in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus/Impaired Fasting Glucose: Observations From Traditional and Bayesian Random-Effects Meta-Analyses of Randomized Trials

Background— Most guidelines for treatment of hypertension recommend a blood pressure (BP) goal of <140/90 mm Hg, and a more aggressive goal of <130/80 mm Hg for patients with diabetes mellitus. However, in the recent Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial, a lower BP was not beneficial. The optimal BP target in subjects with diabetes mellitus or those with impaired fasting glucose/glucose tolerance is therefore not well defined. Methods and Results— We performed PUBMED, EMBASE, and CENTRAL searches for randomized clinical trials from 1965 through October 2010 of antihypertensive therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus or impaired fasting glucose/impaired glucose tolerance that enrolled at least 100 patients with achieved systolic BP of ⩽135 mm Hg in the intensive BP control group and ⩽140 mm Hg in the standard BP control group, had a follow-up of at least 1 year, and evaluated macrovascular or microvascular events. We identified 13 randomized clinical trials enrolling 37 736 participants. Intensive BP control was associated with a 10% reduction in all-cause mortality (odds ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 0.98), a 17% reduction in stroke, and a 20% increase in serious adverse effects, but with similar outcomes for other macrovascular and microvascular (cardiac, renal, and retinal) events compared with standard BP control. The results were similar in a sensitivity analysis using a bayesian random-effects model. More intensive BP control (⩽130 mm Hg) was associated with a greater reduction in stroke, but did not reduce other events. Meta–regression analysis showed continued risk reduction for stroke to a systolic BP of <120 mm Hg. However, at levels <130 mm Hg, there was a 40% increase in serious adverse events with no benefit for other outcomes. Conclusions— The present body of evidence suggests that in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus/impaired fasting glucose/impaired glucose tolerance, a systolic BP treatment goal of 130 to 135 mm Hg is acceptable. However, with more aggressive goals (<130 mm Hg), we observed target organ heterogeneity in that the risk of stroke continued to fall, but there was no benefit regarding the risk of other macrovascular or microvascular (cardiac, renal and retinal) events, and the risk of serious adverse events even increased.

[1]  Michele Tarsilla Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[2]  Walter T Ambrosius,et al.  Effects of medical therapies on retinopathy progression in type 2 diabetes. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  G. Mancia,et al.  Influence of blood pressure reduction on composite cardiovascular endpoints in clinical trials , 2010, Journal of hypertension.

[4]  Kevin A Peterson,et al.  Effects of Intensive Blood-Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus , 2011 .

[5]  M. Laakso,et al.  Effect of valsartan on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  H. Parving,et al.  Effect of candesartan on microalbuminuria and albumin excretion rate in diabetes: three randomized trials. , 2009, Annals of internal medicine.

[7]  R. Collins,et al.  The Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial: blood pressure-lowering limb: effects in patients with type II diabetes , 2008, Journal of hypertension.

[8]  G. Bakris,et al.  Effects of different ACE inhibitor combinations on albuminuria: results of the GUARD study. , 2008, Kidney international.

[9]  J. Fleg,et al.  Effect of lower targets for blood pressure and LDL cholesterol on atherosclerosis in diabetes: the SANDS randomized trial. , 2008, JAMA.

[10]  R. Fogari,et al.  Addition of manidipine improves the antiproteinuric effect of candesartan in hypertensive patients with type II diabetes and microalbuminuria. , 2007, American journal of hypertension.

[11]  Anushka Patel,et al.  Effects of a fixed combination of perindopril and indapamide on macrovascular and microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the ADVANCE trial): a randomised controlled trial , 2007, The Lancet.

[12]  P. Mehler,et al.  Appropriate blood pressure control in hypertensive and normotensive type 2 diabetes mellitus: a summary of the ABCD trial , 2007, Nature Clinical Practice Nephrology.

[13]  A. Dominiczak,et al.  2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) , 2007, European heart journal.

[14]  Jonathan J Deeks,et al.  Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta‐analytical methods with rare events , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  Z. Tran,et al.  Effect of intensive blood pressure control with valsartan on urinary albumin excretion in normotensive patients with type 2 diabetes. , 2006, American journal of hypertension.

[16]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effect of ramipril on the incidence of diabetes. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  G. Mancia,et al.  Dogma Disputed: Can Aggressively Lowering Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Be Dangerous? , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  M. Simoons,et al.  The effect of perindopril on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the EUROPA study: results from the PERSUADE substudy. , 2005, European heart journal.

[19]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Bayesian random effects meta‐analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales by D. E. Warn, S. G. Thompson and D. J. Spiegelhalter, Statistics in Medicine 2002; 21: 1601–1623 , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  Neil Chapman,et al.  Effects of different blood pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events in individuals with and without diabetes mellitus: results of prospectively designed overviews of randomized trials. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.

[21]  M. Mauer,et al.  Preventing microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  J. Tuomilehto,et al.  Equivalence of indapamide SR and enalapril on microalbuminuria reduction in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes: The NESTOR* study , 2004, Journal of hypertension.

[23]  Julian P T Higgins,et al.  Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  Alexander J Sutton,et al.  What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data. , 2004, Statistics in medicine.

[25]  Morris J. Brown,et al.  British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 2004 (BHS-IV): summary , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  B. Davis,et al.  Cardiovascular Outcomes Using Doxazosin vs. Chlorthalidone for the Treatment of Hypertension in Older Adults With and Without Glucose Disorders: A Report From the ALLHAT Study , 2004, Journal of clinical hypertension.

[27]  J. Whitworth,et al.  2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension , 2003, Journal of hypertension.

[28]  Daniel W. Jones,et al.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. , 2003, JAMA.

[29]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[30]  R. Fogari,et al.  Effects of amlodipine fosinopril combination on microalbuminuria in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients. , 2002, American journal of hypertension.

[31]  G. Viberti,et al.  Microalbuminuria Reduction With Valsartan in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Blood Pressure–Independent Effect , 2002, Circulation.

[32]  J. Chan,et al.  Long-term effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and metabolic control in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients. , 2000, Kidney international.

[33]  Illiam,et al.  THE EFFECT OF NISOLDIPINE AS COMPARED WITH ENALAPRIL ON CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH NON-INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES AND HYPERTENSION , 2000 .

[34]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement , 1999, The Lancet.

[35]  Jahangir Ahmad,et al.  Effective Postponement of Diabetic Nephropathy With Enalapril in Normotensive Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Microalbuminuria , 1997, Diabetes Care.

[36]  G. Smith,et al.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test , 1997, BMJ.

[37]  R F Galbraith,et al.  A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials. , 1988, Statistics in medicine.