A new three-component signal model to objectively select power Doppler wall filter cut-off velocity for quantitative microvascular imaging

The wall-filter selection curve (WFSC) method was developed to automatically select cut-off velocities for high-frequency power Doppler imaging. Selection curves are constructed by plotting color pixel density (CPD) as a function of wall filter cut-off velocity. A new three-component mathematical model is developed to guide the design of an online implementation of the method for in vivo imaging. The model treats Doppler imaging as a signal detection task in which the scanner must distinguish intravascular pixels from perivascular and extravascular pixels and includes a cost function to identify the optimum cut-off velocity that provides accurate vascular quantification and minimizes the effect of color pixel artifacts on visualization of vascular structures. The goodness of fit of the three-component model to flow-phantom data is significantly improved compared to a previous two-component model (F test, p < 0:005). Simulations using the new model indicate that selection curves should be sampled using at least 100 cut-off velocities to ensure robust performance of the automated WFSC method and determine an upper bound on CPD variability that ensures reliable vascular quantification accuracy, defined as CPD within 5% of the reference vascular volume fraction. Results of the simulations also provide evidence that limiting the selection of the cut-off velocity to a binary choice between the middle and right end of the characteristic interval is sufficient to meet the quantification accuracy goal. The model provides an intuitive, empirical description of the relationship between system settings and blood-flow detection performance in power Doppler imaging.

[1]  James C. Lacefield,et al.  Objective Selection of High-Frequency Power Doppler Wall Filter Cutoff Velocity for Regions of Interest Containing Multiple Small Vessels , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  A. Nilsson Artefacts in sonography and Doppler , 2001, European Radiology.

[3]  Men-Tzung Lo,et al.  Factor analysis in both spatial and temporal domains of color blooming artifacts in ultrasound investigations utilizing contrast agents. , 2004, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[4]  B. Al-Khazraji,et al.  A Simple “Streak Length Method” for Quantifying and Characterizing Red Blood Cell Velocity Profiles and Blood Flow in Rat Skeletal Muscle Arterioles , 2012, Microcirculation.

[5]  Rakesh K Jain,et al.  Delivery of molecular and cellular medicine to solid tumors. , 1997, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[6]  James C Lacefield,et al.  Detectability of small blood vessels with high-frequency power Doppler and selection of wall filter cut-off velocity for microvascular imaging. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  Donald J. Schuirmann A comparison of the Two One-Sided Tests Procedure and the Power Approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability , 1987, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[8]  Roger J. Zemp,et al.  Experimental validation of a power Doppler performance model , 2003, IEEE Symposium on Ultrasonics, 2003.

[9]  B. Morgan Opportunities and pitfalls of cancer imaging in clinical trials , 2011, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[10]  R. Karshafian,et al.  Quantification of flow using ultrasound and microbubbles: a disruption replenishment model based on physical principles. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  James C Lacefield,et al.  Improved objective selection of power Doppler wall-filter cut-off velocity for accurate vascular quantification. , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[12]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Ideal Observer Model for Detection of Blood Perfusion and Flow Using Ultrasound , 2003, IPMI.

[13]  Michael F. Insana,et al.  Doppler ultrasound systems designed for tumor blood flow imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[14]  Franklin A. Graybill,et al.  Introduction to The theory , 1974 .

[15]  Giselle Limentani,et al.  Beyond the t-test: statistical equivalence testing. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.