Identifying Contributors of DNA Mixtures by Means of Quantitative Information of STR Typing

Estimating the weight of evidence in forensic genetics is often done in terms of a likelihood ratio, LR. The LR evaluates the probability of the observed evidence under competing hypotheses. Most often, probabilities used in the LR only consider the evidence from the genomic variation identified using polymorphic genetic markers. However, modern typing techniques supply additional quantitative data, which contain very important information about the observed evidence. This is particularly true for cases of DNA mixtures, where more than one individual has contributed to the observed biological stain. This article presents a method for including the quantitative information of short tandem repeat (STR) DNA mixtures in the LR. Also, an efficient algorithmic method for finding the best matching combination of DNA mixture profiles is derived and implemented in an on-line tool for two- and three-person DNA mixtures. Finally, we demonstrate for two-person mixtures how this best matching pair of profiles can be used in estimating the likelihood ratio using importance sampling. The reason for using importance sampling for estimating the likelihood ratio is the often vast number of combinations of profiles needed for the evaluation of the weight of evidence. Online tool is available at http://people.math.aau.dk/~tvede/dna/.

[1]  David J Balding,et al.  Effects of population structure on DNA fingerprint analysis in forensic science , 1991, Heredity.

[2]  J. Whitaker,et al.  Analysis and interpretation of mixed forensic stains using DNA STR profiling. , 1998, Forensic science international.

[3]  I. Evett,et al.  Interpreting DNA Evidence: Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists , 1998 .

[4]  W R Mayr,et al.  DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the interpretation of mixtures. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[5]  P. Gill,et al.  PENDULUM--a guideline-based approach to the interpretation of STR mixtures. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[6]  J Buckleton,et al.  Interpreting simple STR mixtures using allele peak areas. , 1998, Forensic science international.

[7]  Tsewei Wang,et al.  Least‐Square Deconvolution: A Framework for Interpreting Short Tandem Repeat Mixtures * , 2006, Journal of forensic sciences.

[8]  Steffen L. Lauritzen,et al.  A gamma model for {DNA} mixture analyses , 2007 .

[9]  Niels Morling,et al.  Estimating the probability of allelic drop-out of STR alleles in forensic genetics. , 2009, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[10]  P Gill,et al.  DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the evaluation of STR typing results that may include drop-out and/or drop-in using probabilistic methods. , 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[11]  John M. Butler,et al.  Forensic DNA Typing: Biology, Technology, and Genetics of STR Markers , 2001 .

[12]  D. Cox.  Some problems connected with statistical inference , 1958 .

[13]  M W Perlin,et al.  Linear mixture analysis: a mathematical approach to resolving mixed DNA samples. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.

[14]  J. Curran.  A MCMC method for resolving two person mixtures. , 2008, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[15]  J A Lambert,et al.  Taking account of peak areas when interpreting mixed DNA profiles. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.

[16]  T. Tvedebrink,et al.  Evaluating the weight of evidence by using quantitative short tandem repeat data in DNA mixtures , 2010 .

[17]  S L Lauritzen,et al.  Identification and separation of DNA mixtures using peak area information. , 2007, Forensic science international.